green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. State
(2×)
Accord Jennings v. State, 453 So.2d 1109, 1113-14 (Fla.1984) (in a capital murder trial, it was improper for the prosecutor to ‘compare [the defendant’s] right to use the telephone to call an attorney during his interrogation and the victim’s right to live’), vacated on other grounds, 470 U.S. 1002 , 105 S.Ct. 1351 , 84 L.Ed.2d 374 (1985); People v. Henderson, 142 Ill.2d [258] at 322, 154 Ill.Dec. [785] at 815-16, 568 N.E.2d [1234] at 1264-65 (in a capital murder trial, the following comments by the prosecutor were improper: ‘What about [the victim’s] rights?
examined
Cited "see"
Jennings v. Crosby
(4×)
See Jennings v. Fla., 470 U.S. 1002 , 105 S.Ct. 1351 , 84 L.Ed.2d 374 (1985) (mem.).
examined
Cited "see"
McNair v. State
(4×)
Accord Jennings v. State, 453 So.2d 1109, 1113-14 (Fla.1984) (in a capital murder trial, it was improper for the prosecutor to "compare [the defendant's] right to use the telephone to call an attorney during his interrogation and the victim's right to live"), vacated on other grounds, 470 U.S. 1002 , 105 S.Ct. 1351 , 84 L.Ed.2d 374 (1985); People v. Henderson, 142 Ill.2d at 322 , 154 Ill.Dec. at 815-16 , 568 N.E.2d at 1264-65 (in a capital murder trial, the following comments by the prosecutor were improper: "What about [the victim's] rights?
discussed
Cited "see"
Muehleman v. State
(2×)
See Jennings v. State, 453 So.2d 1109, 1114 (Fla. 1984), cert. granted and judgment vacated on other grounds, 470 U.S. 1002 , 105 S.Ct. 1351 , 84 L.Ed.2d 374 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Scott v. State
(2×)
See Jennings v. State, 453 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 1984), vacated on other grounds, 470 U.S. 1002 , 105 S.Ct. 1351 , 84 L.Ed.2d 374 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Calloway
v.
Alabama
v.
Alabama
No. 84-5912.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 25, 1985.
Published
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ala. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.