green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
14.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1992 ·
…once congress has addressed a national concern, court's fundamental commitment to separation of powers precludes it from scrutinizing the sufficiency of solution
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Wassil
ecause the connecticut penal code has been modeled after its new york counterpart we have derived sustenance from the new york decisions interpreting its code
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Chester C. Sanson v. General Motors Corporation
(2×)
once congress has addressed a national concern, court's fundamental commitment to separation of powers precludes it from scrutinizing the sufficiency of solution
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ellenwood v. Exxon Shipping Co.
there is no question that federal courts may borrow from a variety of sources in establishing common law admiralty rules to govern maritime liability where deemed appropriate.
discussed
Cited "see"
R. D. v. G. D.
See McGaffin v. Roberts, 193 Conn. 393, 409 , 479 A.2d 176 (1984) (“the validity of any claim that the trial court’s decision is not supported by the evidence may be tested only by reference to the record together with the transcripts and exhibits filed in the case”), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1747 , 84 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jamestown Daycare Center, Inc.
See United States v. Ernst & Whinney, 735 F.2d 1296 , 1300–01 (11th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 (1985). 5.
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph E. McClain III v. Dell, Inc., Seaton Corp. D/B/A Staff Management
See 470 U.S. 1050 (1985) United States v. Ernst & Whinney, 735 F.2d 1296, 1301 (11th Cir. 1984), cert.denied, (traditional equitable grounds need to be shown for an injunction pursuant to § 7402 only). 58 26 U.S.C. § 7407 (b). 59 Id. § 6694(a). 46.
discussed
Cited "see"
DiPietro v. Farmington Sports Arena, LLC
(2×)
See State v. Asherman, 193 Conn. 695, 716-17 , 478 A.2d 227 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S.Ct. 1749 , 84 L.Ed.2d 814 (1985). *982 Accordingly, the court granted the motions for summary judgment.
discussed
Cited "see"
Director of Health Affairs Policy Planning v. Freedom of Information Commission
(2×)
Thus, we are bound to construe the statute in a manner that will reflect and achieve the purpose for which it was enacted; see McGaffin v. Roberts, 193 Conn. 393, 407 , 479 A.2d 176 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1747 , 84 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Crespo
See State v. Asherman, 193 Conn. 695, 721 , 478 A.2d 227 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1749 , 84 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Madagoski v. Commissioner of Correction
See Pierce v. Commissioner of Correction, 100 Conn. App. 1 , 12 n.5, 916 A.2d 864 , cert. denied, 282 Conn. 908 , 920 A.2d 1017 (2007). 4 In connection with his due process claim regarding the preservation of the van, the petitioner also argues on appeal that the habeas court improperly failed to apply the balancing test enunciated in State v. Asherman, 193 Conn. 695, 724 , 478 A.2d 227 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1749 , 84 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Bidoae v. Hartford Golf Club
See State v. Asherman, 193 Conn. 695, 716 , 478 A.2d 227 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1749 , 84 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Swinton
See State v. Asherman, 193 Conn. 695, 716 , 478 A.2d 227 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1749 , 84 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Sanchez
See State v. Asherman, 193 Conn. 695, 718-19 , 478 A.2d 227 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1749 , 84 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Dickens v. Jones
See Matlock v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1236 (6th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S.Ct. 1747 , 84 L.Ed.2d 812 (1985). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Cucuel v. Fayed, No. Cv 94 315420 (Feb. 28, 1997)
See McGaffin v. Roberts, 193 Conn. 393 , 401 n. 9, 479 A.2d 176 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S.Ct. 1747 , 84 L.Ed.2d 813 (1985) (an action is commenced on the date of service).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Webb
Ed. 2d 342 ] (1986).” State v. Cruz, 212 Conn. 351, 364 , 562 A.2d 1071 (1989); see State v. Asherman, 193 Conn. 695, 735-36 , 478 A.2d 227 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1749 , 84 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Balisok
See RCW 2.06.040. [3] 193 Conn. 695 , 478 A.2d 227 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 84 L.Ed.2d 814 , 105 S.Ct. 1749 (1985). [4] In Marino v. Vasquez, 812 F.2d 499 (9th Cir.1987) the trial court authorized the jury's reenactment to test a claim that the victim had been shot in the back of the head while sitting in a corner.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hoeplinger
See State v. Asherman, 193 Conn. 695, 735-36 , 478 A.2d 227 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1749 , 84 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Gonzalez
See State v. Asherman, 193 Conn. 695, 736 , 478 A.2d 227 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1749 , 84 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Burritt Interfinan. Bancorp. v. Genvest, No. 099178 (Mar. 27, 1991)
See McGaffin v. Roberts, 193 Conn. 393 , 401 n. 9 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S.Ct. 1747 , 84 L.Ed.2d 813 (1985); Valley Cable Vision Inc. v. Public Utility Commission, 175 Conn. 30 , 33 (1978); Broderick v. Jackman, 167 Conn. 96 , 99 (1974); Seaboard Burner Corp. v. DeLongy, 145 Conn. 300 , 303 (1958); Consolidated Motor Lines, Inc. v. M M Transportation Co., 128 Conn. 107 , 109 (1941).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ortiz
See State v. Asherman, 193 Conn. 695 , 732 n.12, 478 A.2d 227 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1749 , 84 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Romall H. Smith v. Eric C. Dahlberg, Warden
See Matlock v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1236, 1242 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Donald C. Crockett v. Donnie Noles, Warden
See Matlock v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1236, 1241 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. City of Trenton
See Murray v. Gardner, 741 F.2d 434, 438 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S.Ct. 1748 , 84 L,Ed.2d 813 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. City Of Trenton
See Murray v. Gardner, 741 F.2d 434, 438 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S.Ct. 1748 , 84 L.Ed.2d 813 (1985). 28 Connick compels the conclusion that the letter in question did not deal with matters of public concern, and that conclusion obviates any need for further "balancing" between the interest of the police officers in speaking out and the interest of the city in maintaining discipline and decorum in the ranks of its police force.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Greene
See State v. Asherman, 193 Conn. 695, 719 , 478 A.2d 227 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1749 , 84 L.
cited
Cited "see"
John Alfred Duncombe, III v. Dale Foltz
See Matlock v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1236, 1242 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 (1985); Long v. Smith, 663 F.2d 18, 23 (6th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Lea T.
We cannot review a claim of insufficient evidence where, as here, we have not been afforded the opportunity to review fully all of the evidence which was before the trial court. “[T]he validity of any claim that the trial court’s decision is not supported by the evidence may be tested only by reference to the record together with the transcripts and exhibits filed in the case; see Morningside Assn. v. Morningside Development, Inc., 172 Conn. 60, 63 , 372 A.2d 141 (1976).” (Emphasis added.) McGaffin v. Roberts, 193 Conn. 393, 409 , 479 A.2d 176 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Sanders v. Sullivan
See Matlock v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1236, 1242 (6th Cir.1984) (“Errors that might not be so prejudicial as to amount to a deprivation of due process when considered alone, may cumulatively produce a trial setting that is fundamentally unfair.”), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S.Ct. 1747 , 84 L.Ed.2d 812 (1985); Payne v. Janasz, 711 F.2d 1305, 1316 (6th Cir.) (Jones, J., dissenting) (“Errors which standing alone may be deemed harmless or insufficiently prejudicial to amount to a denial of due process may cumulatively produce a trial setting which is fundamentally unfair.”), cert. denied, 4…
cited
Cited "see"
David Alan Ovegian v. Denise M. Quarles
See Matlock v. Rose, 731 F.2d 1236, 1242 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 (1985). 5 Therefore, petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel is denied.
cited
Cited "see"
Edwards v. McMahon
See James v. O’Bannon, 715 F.2d 794 , 808-09 (3d Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S.Ct. 1746 , 84 L.Ed.2d 812 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Helene Edwards Christine Streicher Diamond, and Helen Edwards Christine Streicher Diamond California Coalition of Welfare Rights Organizations Sharon Lilly Judith A. Tillings Plaintiffs-Intervenors/appellees v. Linda S. McMahon Director of the State Department of Social Services Department of Social Services, an Agency of the State of California Michael Franchetti, Director of the Department of Finance of the State of California Dept. Of Finance, an Agency of the State of California Defendants/counter-Claimants, Third-Party v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Third-Party
See James v. O'Bannon, 715 F.2d 794 , 808-09 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S.Ct. 1746 , 84 L.Ed.2d 812 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Williams
See State v. Asherman, 193 Conn. 695, 705 , 478 A.2d 227 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1749 , 84 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Deel v. Lukhard
See Bell v. Massinga, 721 F.2d 131, 133 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S.Ct. 1746 , 84 L.Ed.2d 812 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Deel v. Lukhard
See Bell v. Massinga, 721 F.2d 131, 133 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S.Ct. 1746 , 84 L.Ed.2d 812 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
DeLucia v. Burns
See McGaffin v. Roberts, 193 Conn. 393 , 399 n.6, 479 A.2d 176 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1747 , 84 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Goold v. Goold
See McGaffin v. Roberts, 193 Conn. 393 , 399 n.6, 479 A.2d 176 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1747 , 84 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Proto
See McGaffin v. Roberts, 193 Conn. 393 , 399 n.6, 479 A.2d 176 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1747 , 84 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tracy S. Barcelona
Double Jeopardy A defendant may not ordinarily appeal the denial of his motion to dismiss because that denial is not a final decision. 28 U.S.C. § 1291 ; see United States v. McLean, 738 F.2d 655 , 660 n. 10 (5th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S.Ct. 1748 , 84 L.Ed.2d 813 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Cookson v. Cookson
Santosky v. Kramer, supra, 759 ; see McGaffin v. Roberts, 193 Conn. 393, 405 , 479 A.2d 176 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1747 , 84 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hobson
See State v. Asherman, 193 Conn. 695, 705 , 478 A.2d 227 , cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1749 , 84 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Magnotti
State v. Federici, 179 Conn. 46, 54-55 , 425 A.2d 916 (1979); see State v. Asherman, 193 Conn. 695, 704 , 478 A.2d 227 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1749 , 84 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Preyer
See State v. Asherman, 193 Conn. 695, 718 , 478 A.2d 227 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1749 , 84 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Milum
Ed. 2d 347 (1974).’ State v. Wilson, 188 Conn. 715, 720 , 453 A.2d 765 (1982).” State v. Shindell, 195 Conn. 128, 140 , 486 A.2d 637 (1985); see State v. Ouellette, supra. In State v. Asherman, 193 Conn. 695, 718 , 478 A.2d 227 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1749 , 84 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cooper
Similarly, article first, § 8, of the Connecticut constitution provides in relevant part that ‘‘[n]o person shall be compelled to give evidence against himself . . . .’’ Conn. Const., art I, § 8; see also State v. Asherman, 193 Conn. 695, 712 , 714–15, 478 A.2d 227 (1984) (holding that there is no constitutional difference between ‘‘giving evidence’’ and ‘‘being a witness’’ against oneself), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1749 , 84 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Henderson
See, e.g., People v. Wells, 101 App. Div. 3d 1250, 1252–53, 955 N.Y.S.2d 684 (2012), appeal denied, 20 N.Y.3d 1066 , 985 N.E.2d 927 , 962 N.Y.S.2d 617 (2013); see also State v. Asherman, 193 Conn. 695, 728 , 732–33, 478 A.2d 227 (1984) (concluding that extreme emotional disturbance defense instruction was warranted on basis of testimony of witnesses regarding defendant’s bizarre behavior and appearance after murder, as well as brutal nature of murder itself), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S. Ct. 1749 , 84 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lopez v. Commissioner of Correction
The peti- tioner testified that Carty rebuffed his request to pursue Lopez III’s testimony by saying, ‘‘that[’s] [your] son and nobody’s going to believe him.’’ The habeas court like- wise concluded that Carty did not perform deficiently in part because ‘‘[Lopez III’s] credibility would have been challenged by the state due to his relationship with [the petitioner].’’ Although it is true, as a general matter, that a witness’ close familial relationship to a party may give rise to bias; see, e.g., State v. Asherman, 193 Conn. 695 , 719–20, 478 A.2d 227 (1984), cert. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tracey v. Miami Beach Assn.
Although the trial court also discussed both claim pre- clusion and collateral estoppel in its memorandum of decision, we are mindful that a judicial opinion ‘‘must be read as a whole, without particular portions read in isolation, to discern the parameters of its holding.’’ Fisher v. Big Y Foods, Inc., 298 Conn. 414 , 424–25, 3 A.3d 919 (2010); see also McGaffin v. Roberts, 193 Conn. 393, 408 , 479 A.2d 176 (1984) (‘‘[w]e examine the trial court’s memorandum of decision to understand better the basis of the court’s decision and to determine the reasoning for the conclusion r…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Campbell
See, e.g., State v. Asherman , 193 Conn. 695 , 728, 732-33, 478 A.2d 227 (1984) (holding that extreme emotional disturbance instruction was warranted on basis of testimony of witnesses regarding defendant's bizarre behavior and appearance after murder, as well as brutal nature of murder itself, which "appeared to have been perpetrated by someone who was mentally or emotionally agitated probably while under the influence of mind altering drugs"), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S.Ct. 1749 , 84 L.Ed. 2d 814 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Breton v. Commissioner of Correction
See, e.g., State v. Asherman , 193 Conn. 695 , 729-31, 478 A.2d 227 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1050 , 105 S.Ct. 1749 , 84 L.Ed.2d 814 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James
v.
Cohen, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
v.
Cohen, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
No. 83-6168.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 1985.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.