green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1995 ·
…the collective bargaining agreement from which moore's transfer rights arise, requires that moore resort to the grievance procedures set forth in the agreement
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Potter v. Associated Electric Co-Op
the collective bargaining agreement from which moore's transfer rights arise, requires that moore resort to the grievance procedures set forth in the agreement
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Potter v. Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc.
the collective bargaining agreement from which moore's transfer rights arise, requires that moore resort to the grievance procedures set forth in the agreement
discussed
Cited "see"
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. Neal
Guran Co. v. City of Akron, 546 F.2d 201, 204 (6th Cir.1976); see also In re Miller, 124 Fed.App’x. 152, 154-56 (4th Cir.2005) (unpublished) (determining that no private right of action arises from violation of NHA loss mitigation provisions); see generally Burroughs v. Hills, 741 F.2d 1525, 1531-32 (7th Cir.1984) (“Efforts to enforce implied causes of action under the National Housing Legislation or the HUD Handbook, have frequently come under consideration of appellate courts, and have always failed.”), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2321 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Neal v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
See Burroughs v. Hills, 741 F.2d 1525, 1531-32 (7th Cir.1984) *753 (citing numerous instances of “[ejfforts to enforce implied causes of action under the National Housing Legislation or the HUD Handbook,” all of which have failed in appellate courts), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2321 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985); Shivers v. Landrieu, 674 F.2d 906, 911-12 (D.C.Cir.1981) (finding that the National Housing Act does not provide for an implied private right of action); Falzarano v. United States, 607 F.2d 506, 509-11 (1st Cir.1979) (stating that the National Housing Act does not provide …
cited
Cited "see"
Arneson v. Sullivan
See Sears v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry., 749 F.2d 1451 , 1456 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2322 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Pena v. Downey Savings & Loan, Ass'n
See Hunter, 746 F.2d at 642 (quoting Garibaldi v. Lucky Food Stores, Inc., 726 F.2d 1367 , 1371 n. 5 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2319 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 (1985)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gilmore v. List & Clark Construction Co.
See Sears v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry., Co., in which the Tenth Circuit denied a union's request to apportion fault between it and the defendant employer in a Title VII action, finding that the Supreme Court, in Northwest Airlines, "was unwilling to create a contribution remedy for a statutory violation when Congress had not *1313 manifested an intent that a right of contribution should exist.” 749 F.2d 1451 , 1444 (10th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2322 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rosa Francisco
See United States v. Brainard, 690 F.2d 1117, 1122 (4th Cir.1982) (stating that closing arguments may include reasonable inferences from the evidence), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2320 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Miguel Navarro-Espinosa
See United States v. Sterling, *1172 742 F.2d 521, 527 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2322 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Henoud
See United States v. Brainard, 745 F.2d 320, 323 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Lee Baker, AKA \Eddie\"
Sec. 848 (c); see United States v. Sterling, 742 F.2d 521, 525 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2322 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Baker
In his closing argument, the prosecutor told the jury that they would “have to make individual decisions as to whether each and every one of [the CCE defendants] satisfied the essential [CCE] elements beyond a reasonable doubt.” In order to convict a defendant under § 848, the government must show that (1) the defendant committed a felony violation of federal narcotics law which was (2) part of a continuing series of three or more violations (3) undertaken in concert with five or more persons (4) with respect to whom the defendant acted as an organizer, supervisor, or manager, 17 and (5) …
discussed
Cited "see"
Roy Jackson v. Richard B. Gramley, Warden, Pontiac Correctional Center and Roland W. Burris, Attorney General of the State of Illinois
See United States v. Brainard, 745 F.2d 320, 324 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 (1985). 4 AFFIRMED. * After preliminary examination of the briefs, the court notified the parties that it had tentatively concluded that oral argument would not be helpful to the court in this case.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernesto Antone, Sr.
See United States v. Sterling, 742 F.2d 521, 527 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2322 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Douglas Hauck
See Burroughs v. Hills, 741 F.2d 1525, 1529 (7th Cir.1984) (HUD Handbook “intended for internal use for the information and guidance of HUD officials” and “ ‘has no binding force’ ”) (quoting Litton Systems, Inc. v. Whirlpool Corp., 728 F.2d 1423, 1439 (Fed.Cir.1984)), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2321 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arthur Packard Condie, United States of America v. Arthur Packard Condie
See United States v. Sterling, 742 F.2d 521, 527 (9th Cir.1984), ("[w]hen a continuance is requested to obtain witnesses, the accused must show ... that the testimony will be competent and relevant"), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Randall Paul Evans
See United States v. Brainard, 745 F.2d 320, 323-24 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 (1985). 30 IV.
discussed
Cited "see"
Whitaker v. Clementon Housing Authority
See Burroughs v. Hills, 564 F.Supp. 1007, 1015 (N.D.Ill.1983), aff'd, 741 F.2d 1525 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2321 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985); Estrada v. Hills, 401 F.Supp. 429, 437 (N.D.Ill.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth J. Masat
See United States v. Przybyla, 737 F.2d 828, 829 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2320 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 (1985) (citations omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit Corp.
See Sears v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry., 749 F.2d 1451 , 1456 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2322 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Laurie Jane Luttrell, United States of America v. William Dale Kegley, Aka: Bill Kegley
(2×)
See United States v. Jenrette, 744 F.2d 817, 824 (D.C.Cir.) (no constitutional violation where FBI targeted defendant without "reasonable suspicion" of wrongdoing), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2321 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1984); United States v. Gamble, 737 F.2d 853, 860 (10th Cir.1984) ("government need not have reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing in order to conduct an undercover investigation"); United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 608-09 (3d Cir.1982) (en banc) (rejecting "reasonable basis" test), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984); United States v.…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Phillip H. Nicely
See United States v. Jenrette, 744 F.2d 817 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2321 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985); United States v. Kelly, 707 F.2d 1460 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 908 , 104 S.Ct. 264 , 78 L.Ed.2d 247 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Merritt Logan, Inc., Debtor-In-Possession. Merritt Logan, Inc. D/B/A Rancocas Thriftway v. Fleming Companies, Inc. Fleming Foods of Pennsylvania, Inc. Hussman Refrigeration, Inc. And Engineering & Refrigeration, Inc., Appeal of Engineering and Refrigeration, Inc., at No. 89-1522 in Re Merritt Logan, Inc. Debtor-In-Possession. Merritt Logan, Inc. D/B/A Rancocas Thriftway v. Fleming Companies, Inc. Fleming Foods of Pennsylvania, Inc. Hussman Refrigeration, Inc. And Engineering & Refrigeration, Inc. Appeal of Hussman Refrigeration, Inc., at No. 89-1523 in Re Merritt Logan, Inc. Debtor-In-Possession. Merritt Logan, Inc. D/B/A Rancocas Thriftway v. Fleming Companies, Inc. Fleming Foods of Pennsylvania, Inc. Hussman Refrigeration, Inc. And Engineering & Refrigeration, Inc. Appeal of Merritt Logan, Inc., at No. 89-1524 in Re Merritt Logan, Inc. Debtor-In-Possession. Merritt Logan, Inc. D/B/A Rancocas Thriftway v. Fleming Companies, Inc. Fleming Foods of Pennsylvania, Inc. Hussman Refrigeration, Inc. And Engineering & Refrigeration, Inc. Appeal of Fleming Companies, Inc. And Fleming Foods of Pennsylvania, Inc. At No. 89-1525
See United States v. Olgin, 745 F.2d 263, 268 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2321 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Merritt Logan, Inc. v. Fleming Companies, Inc. (In re Merritt Logan, Inc.)
See United States v. Olgin, 745 F.2d 263, 268 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2321 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donaciano Hernandez-Escarsega
See United States v. Sterling, 742 F.2d 521, 525 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2322 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985). 4 For purposes of the second element, “continuing series” has been interpreted by the courts as consisting of three or more federal narcotics violations.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Thomas (87-1623), Anthony L. Gaston (87-1634), and Eddie Gaston (87-1697)
See United States v. Sterling, 742 F.2d 521, 527 (9th Cir.1984) (holding that prosecutorial error does not warrant reversal unless substantial prejudice results), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2322 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Adkins v. State
See United States v. Brainard, 690 F.2d 1117, 1123 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2320 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 (1985), citing United States v. Thomas, 571 F.2d 285, 288 (5th Cir.1978) (where attorney expressly indicated that client would assert privilege under the Fifth Amendment); but see United States v. MacCloskey, 682 F.2d 468, 477-8 (4th Cir.1982) (“The rule requires, however, that the court first rule the declarant exempt from testifying on the ground of privilege.”); see also Roberts v. United States, 445 U.S. 552 , 560 n. 7, 100 S.Ct. 1358 , 1364 n. 7, 63 L.Ed.2d …
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Charles Bonanno, Jr.
See United States v. Sterling, 742 F.2d 521, 527 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2322 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Association of Flight Attendants
See Garibaldi v. Lucky Food Stores, Inc., 726 F.2d 1367, 1373-74 (9th Cir.1984) (California has established public policy interest in protecting employee discharged for reporting shipment of adulterated milk to health officials), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2319 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 (1986); Sutton v. Southwest Forest Industries, Inc., 643 F.Supp. 662, 665 (D.Kan.1986) (state has strong public policy interest in protecting employee from retaliatory discharge, therefore, action not pre-empted by federal law).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fred M. Mosely
See United States v. Olgin, 745 F.2d 263, 268-70 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2321 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David P. Twomey
See United States v. Olgin, 745 F.2d 263 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2321 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985); United States v. Sans, 731 F.2d 1521 , reh’g denied, 738 F.2d 451 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1111 , 105 S.Ct. 791 , 83 L.Ed.2d 785 (1985). 11 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Presidential Village, LLC v. Perkins
See, e.g., Burroughs v. Hills , 741 F.2d 1525 , 1529 (7th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S. Ct. 2321 , 85 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gambone
See also United States v. Olgin, 745 F.2d 263, 266 (3d Cir.1984) (involving the use of corporate checks to fictitious payees to generate cash proceeds and failure to record and issue receipts for cash sales), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2321 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Msr Exploration, Ltd. v. Meridian Oil, Inc.
Ultramar America, Ltd. v. Dwelle, 900 F.2d 1412, 1416 (9th Cir.1990); see also Garibaldi v. Lucky Food Stores, Inc., 726 F.2d 1367 , 1370 n. 5 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2319 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
MSR Exploration, Ltd. v. Meridian Oil, Inc.
Ultramar America, Ltd. v. Dwelle, 900 F.2d 1412, 1416 (9th Cir.1990); see also Garibaldi v. Lucky Food Stores, Inc., 726 F.2d 1367, 1370 n. 5 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2319 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Walker
United States v. Kelly, 707 F.2d 1460, 1476-77 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 908 , 104 S.Ct. 264 , 78 L.Ed.2d 247 (1983) (footnotes omitted); see also United States v. Jenrette, 744 F.2d 817, 823 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2321 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Erickson v. Erickson
See also Sears v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., 749 F.2d 1451, 1454 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, sub nom, United Transportation Union v. Sears, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2322 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985); Collini v. Wean United, Inc., 101 F.R.D. 408, 410-11 (W.D.Pa.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
MAPCO International Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See also Exxon v. Dept. of Energy, 752 F.2d 650 (Temp.Em.Ct.App.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2321 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985) (specific formulations of noticed subject matter not required in advance if path of agency is reasonably discernible in the rule-making).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Milne Employees Association v. Sun Carriers, Inc.
See also Garibaldi v. Lucky Food Stores, Inc., 726 F.2d 1367 , 1369 n. 4 (9th Cir.1984) (suggesting that an emotional distress claim arising out of a non-preempted claim does not provide a basis for federal jurisdiction), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2319 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 (1985). 41 In the instant case, MEA's complaint appears to allege emotional distress arising from two types of conduct: 1) defendants' conduct in "terminat[ing] the employment relationship between Milne and its employees, and forc[ing] Plaintiffs to look for other jobs while experiencing the economic pressure, psyc…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Milne Employees Ass'n v. Sun Carriers, Inc.
See also Garibaldi v. Lucky Food Stores, Inc., 726 F.2d 1367 , 1369 n. 4 (9th Cir.1984) (suggesting that an emotional distress claim arising out of a non-preempted claim does not provide a basis for federal jurisdiction), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2319 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward Chin
Accord United States v. Luttrell, 923 F.2d 764, 764 (9th Cir.1991) (en banc); United States v. Jacobson, 916 F.2d 467, 469 (8th Cir.1990) (en banc), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1618 , 113 L.Ed.2d 716 (1991); United States v. Gamble, 737 F.2d 853, 860 (10th Cir.1984); United States v. Thoma, 726 F.2d 1191, 1198 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1228 , 104 S.Ct. 2683 , 81 L.Ed.2d 878 (1984); see also United States v. Jenrette, 744 F.2d 817 , 824 n. 13 (D.C.Cir.1984) (rejecting reasonable suspicion requirement in context of undercover investigations of public officials), cert. denied, 4…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donald Whoie
On the first question the accused has the burden; on the second the prosecution has it.” 591 F.2d at 911 (quoting Sherman, 200 F.2d at 882-83 ); see, e.g., United States v. Jenrette, 744 F.2d 817, 821-22 (D.C.Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2321 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985); see also United States v. Rubio, 709 F.2d 146, 151 (2d Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ultramar America Ltd. v. Dwelle
See, e.g., Garibaldi v. Lucky Food Stores, Inc., 726 F.2d 1367 , 1370 n. 5 (9th Cir.1984) (excellent discussion of difference “between an artfully pled complaint and one that is preempted, but not removable”), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2319 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 (1985); see also Franchise Tax Bd., 463 U.S. at 24 , 103 S.Ct. at 2854 (“[I]f a federal cause of action completely preempts a state cause of action any complaint that comes within the scope of the federal cause of action necessarily ‘arises under’ federal law.”) (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ultramar America Limited, a Delaware Corporation v. Thomas W. Dwelle, Individually and as Trustee of the Walter B. Allen, Jr. Trust and the Marjorie Allen Dwelle Trust Created Under the Will of Ann Allen, Ultramar America Limited, and Loyd P. Derby, Real-Party-In-Interest-Appellant v. Thomas W. Dwelle, Individually and as Trustee of the Walter B. Allen, Jr. Trust and the Marjorie Allen Dwelle Trust Created Under the Will of Ann Allen
See, e.g., Garibaldi v. Lucky Food Stores, Inc., 726 F.2d 1367 , 1370 n. 5 (9th Cir.1984) (excellent discussion of difference "between an artfully pled complaint and one that is preempted, but not removable"), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2319 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 (1985); see also Franchise Tax Bd., 463 U.S. at 24 , 103 S.Ct. at 2854 ("[I]f a federal cause of action completely preempts a state cause of action any complaint that comes within the scope of the federal cause of action necessarily 'arises under' federal law.") (emphasis added).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Arthur King
See, e.g., U.S. v. Jenrette, 744 F.2d 817, 820-21 (D.C.Cir.1984), cer t. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2321 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985); U.S. v. Ciambrone, 601 F.2d 616 (2d Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joe Fedroff. Appeal of Joseph Fedroff
See also United States v. Jenrette, 744 F.2d 817, 822 (D.C.Cir.1984) (defendant found predisposed when “he exhibits a ‘state of mind which readily responds to the opportunity furnished by the [government] to commit [the crime].’ ”) (quoting United States v. Burkley, 591 F.2d 903, 916 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 966 , 99 S.Ct. 1516 , 59 L.Ed.2d 782 (1979)), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2321 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Jader Alvarez-Moreno, A/K/A Carlos Jader Alvarez, Said Pavon Jatter, Ricardo Pavon Jatter
(2×)
Compare United States v. Rivera, 837 F.2d 906, 919 (10th Cir.) (no counts of indictment gave defendant notice that government would use acts to support continuing series element), reh’g en banc granted 847 F.2d 660 (1988) with United States v. Sterling, 742 F.2d 521, 523 (9th Cir.1984) (indictment had eleven counts), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2322 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985); United States v. Michel, 588 F.2d 986 , 1000 n. 15 (5th Cir) (defendant convicted of six counts of narcotics violations incorporated in the CCE count), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 825 , 100 S.Ct. 47 , 62 L.Ed.2d 32…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
House v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.
See, e.g., Garibaldi v. Lucky Food Stores, Inc., 726 F. 2d 1367 (9th 1984), cert. den. 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2319 , 85 L.Ed. 2d 839 (1985) (milk truck driver who reported to local department of health that employer had ordered him to deliver spoiled milk); Knight v. American Guard & Alert, Inc., 714 P. 2d 788 (Alaska 1986) (security guard who reported alcohol and drug use by other guards to company for which security services were provided); Wagner v. Globe, 150 Ariz. *50 82, 722 P. 2d 250 (1986) (police officer who reported illegal detention to magistrate); Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Echeverri, Elkin A.
See, e.g., United States v. Sterling, 742 F.2d 521 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2322 , 85 L.Ed.2d 840 (1985); Sperling v. United States, 692 F.2d 223 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied 462 U.S. 1131 , 103 S.Ct. 3111 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1983). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Louise Newberry v. Pacific Racing Association and Tanforan Racing Association Peter W. Tunney, Individually and as Vice President and General Manager
See, e.g., Garibaldi v. Lucky Food Stores, Inc., 726 F.2d 1367 (9th Cir.1984) cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 [ 105 S.Ct. 2319 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 ] (1985) and Olguin v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co., 740 F.2d 1468 (9th Cir.1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lucky Stores, Inc.
v.
Garibaldi
v.
Garibaldi
No. 83-2132.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 13, 1985.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (2)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.