green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Connell v. State
(2×)
See Ranson v. State, 707 S.W.2d 96, 97 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840 , 107 S.Ct. 147 , 93 L.Ed.2d 88 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
34 Collier bankr.cas.2d 332, Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,644 in Re Carroll Dwight Stanley, Debtor. First National Bank of Maryland v. Carroll Dwight Stanley, and Merrill Cohen United States Trustee, Parties in Interest
See United States v. Stockton, 788 F.2d 210, 216 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840 , 107 S.Ct. 147 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
First National Bank of Maryland v. Stanley (In re Stanley)
See United States v. Stockton, 788 F.2d 210, 216 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840 , 107 S.Ct. 147 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. J & E Salvage Company John Darlington Teresa N. Darlington, of the Estate of Edward Darlington
(2×)
See United States v. Stockton, 788 F.2d 210, 216 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840 , 107 S.Ct. 147 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cecelia Denise Shepard, United States of America v. Vance Marcel Gibson, A/K/A Reginald Hilton Belton
See United States v. Stockton, 788 F.2d 210 , 219 n. 15 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Sammie Lee Gordon v. John E. Nagle, Warden Attorney General of the State of Alabama
See Nichols v. Wainwright, 783 F.2d 1540, 1542 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840 , 107 S.Ct. 145 , 93 L.Ed.2d 87 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James R. Brice, A/K/A Roy Briyce, A/K/A Roy James Brice, A/K/A Blocker, A/K/A James R. Bryce, United States of America v. Errol Naaman Dias, A/K/A Aaron Dias
See United States v. Stockton, 788 F.2d 210, 218 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dawn Dempsy Sutton, A/K/A Denny, A/K/A M & M
See United States v. Stockton, 788 F.2d 210, 218 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840 , 107 S.Ct. 147 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Nelson Locklear
See United States v. Stockton, 788 F.2d 210 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840 (1986). 5 Accordingly, Locklear's conviction is affirmed.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mellott Faust
See United States v. Stockton, 788 F.2d 210, 218 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840 (1986); United States v. Tresvant, 677 F.2d 1018, 1021 (4th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William A. Floyd
See United States v. Stockton, 788 F.2d 210, 217 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840 , 107 S.Ct. 147 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986); United States v. Sullivan, 498 F.2d 146, 152 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 993 , 95 S.Ct. 303 , 42 L.Ed.2d 265 (1974); but see Colella v. United States, 360 F.2d 792, 804 (1st Cir.) (no violation if taking done for union purpose, even if act was unauthorized), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 829 , 87 S.Ct. 65 , 17 L.Ed.2d 65 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Scotty Roach, United States of America v. Scotty Roach
The standard of review applicable to Rule 29 motions is "whether there is substantial evidence (direct or circumstantial) which, taken in the light most favorable to the prosecution, would warrant a jury finding that the defendant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt." United States v. MacCloskey, 682 F.2d 468, 473 (4th Cir.1982); see also United States v. Stockton, 788 F.2d 210, 218 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840 (1986); United States v. Tresvant, 677 F.2d 1018 (4th Cir.1982). 8 In determining the issue of substantial evidence, this Court neither weighs the evidence nor considers the …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Elmer J. Cantrell, Also Known as Lucky, United States of America v. Sam F. Long
See, e.g., United States v. Butler, 954 F.2d 114, 118 (2d Cir.1992) (union authorization is one of the controlling lodestars to determine whether a defendant acted with fraudulent intent); see also United States v. Stockton, 788 F.2d 210 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840 , 107 S.Ct. 147 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Herman Lawton, Jr.
Compare, e.g., United States v. Stockton, 788 F.2d 210, 216-17 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840 , 107 S.Ct. 147 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986); United States v. Silverman, 430 F.2d 106, 126-27 (2d Cir.1970) (opinion of Friendly, J.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 953 , 91 S.Ct. 1619 , 29 L.Ed.2d 123 (1971) with, e.g., United States v. Floyd, 882 F.2d 235, 239-41 (7th Cir. 1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Custis
See, e.g., United States v. Stockton, 788 F.2d 210, 220 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840 , 107 S.Ct. 147 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Chateaugay Corp.
“The tort of conversion does not require defendant’s knowledge that he is acting wrongfully, but ‘merely an intent to exercise dominion or control over property in a manner inconsistent with the rights of another.’ United States v. Morrison, 536 F.2d 286, 289 (9th Cir.1976)....” Accord, United States v. Paladin, 539 F.Supp. 100, 103 (W.D.N.Y.1982); See also, United States v. Stockton, 788 F.2d 210, 216 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840 , 107 S.Ct. 147 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Stevens
See, e.g., United States v. Stockton, 788 F.2d 210, 219-20 (4th Cir.) (government permitted to impeach witness’s trial testimony by introducing into evidence her prior inconsistent statements before the grand jury), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840 , 107 S.Ct. 147 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stamper
See also United States v. Stockton, 788 F.2d 210 , 219 n. 15 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840 , 107 S.Ct. 147 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cardall
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-7076.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1986.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.