green
Positive treatment
6.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Edwards v. Johnson
See Ortega v. Rowe, 796 F.2d 765, 767 (5th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 1887 , 95 L.Ed.2d 495 (1987) (explaining that because a detainee’s imprisonment did not result from a conviction the Eighth Amendment is inapplicable).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anthony A. Edwards v. Johnson
See Ortega v. Rowe, 796 F.2d 765, 767 (5th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 1887 , 95 L.Ed.2d 495 (1987) (explaining that because a detainee's imprisonment did not result from a conviction the Eighth Amendment is inapplicable).
discussed
Cited "see"
Edwards v. Johnson
See Ortega v. Rowe, 796 F.2d 765, 767 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 1887 , 95 L.Ed.2d 495 (1987) (explaining that because a detainee’s imprisonment did not result from a conviction the Eighth Amendment is inapplicable).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Funds Held in the Name or for the Benefit of Wetterer
See United States v. Serna, 799 F.2d 842, 850 (2d Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 1887 , 95 L.Ed.2d 494 (1987) (No error to exclude expert testimony on the lack of reliability of eyewitnesses); cf. Arcoren v. U.S., 929 F.2d 1235, 1240 (8th Cir.) (In unusual circumstances district court did not abuse discretion in admitting expert testimony regarding battered woman syndrome), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 913 , 112 S.Ct. 312 , 116 L.Ed.2d 255 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
HARRIS TRUST BANK OF AZ v. Superior Court
See Jones v. United States, 801 F.2d 1334, 1335-36 (Fed.Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 1887 , 95 L.Ed.2d 495 (1987) (action for breach of trust accrues when beneficiary knew or should have known of breach, statute of limitations then begins to run); Jefferson Nat’l Bank of Miami Beach v. Central Nat’l Bank in Chicago, 700 F.2d 1143 , 1151 (7th Cir.1983) (quoting Kay v. Village of Mundelein, 36 Ill.App.3d 433 , 344 N.E.2d 29, 33 (1975)) (when trustee violates trust, statute of limitations is applicable); Brodeur v. American Rexoil Heating Fuel Co., 13 Mass. App.Ct. 939, …
discussed
Cited "see"
Mathie v. Fries
See United States v. Serna, 799 F.2d 842, 850 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 1887 , 95 L.Ed.2d 494 (1987) (No error to exclude expert testimony on the lack of reliability of eyewitnesses); But see Arcoren v. United States, 929 F.2d 1235, 1240 (8th Cir.) (In unusual circumstances district court did not abuse discretion in admitting expert testimony regarding battered woman syndrome), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 913 , 112 S.Ct. 312 , 116 L.Ed.2d 255 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Burrous
See United States v. Serna, 799 F.2d 842, 850 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 1887 , 95 L.Ed.2d 494 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Benny Lavern Collins
See Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967), and Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279 , 111 S.Ct. 1246 , 113 L.Ed.2d 302 (1991) 12 Stirone v. United States, 361 U.S. 212 , 80 S.Ct. 270 , 4 L.Ed.2d 252 (1960) 13 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) 14 United States v. Wright, 797 F.2d 245 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 1887 , 95 L.Ed.2d 495 (1987) 15 See United States v. Stephens, 964 F.2d 424 (5th Cir.1992) (extortion of interstate travelers directly affected interstate commerce); United States v. He…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry v. Mitchell and Roger Woods
See United States v. Wright, 797 F.2d 245, 249 (5th Cir.1986) (upholding a finding, based on testimony by Dr. Voas, that failure to prosecute DUI offenders results in interference with interstate commerce sufficient for Hobbs Act purposes), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 1887 , 95 L.Ed.2d 495 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Salerno
See United States v. Serna, 799 F.2d 842 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 1887 , 95 L.Ed.2d 494 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Salerno
See United States v. Serna, 799 F.2d 842 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 1887 , 95 L.Ed.2d 494 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ankeny
See United States v. Serna, 799 F.2d 842, 848-49 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 1887 , 95 L.Ed.2d 494 (1987); cf. United States v. Leon Guerrero, 847 F.2d 1363, 1367-68 (9th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Victor M. Fontane-Rexach v. Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority
See De Choudens v. Government Development Bank, 801 F.2d 5, 8-9 (1st Cir.1986) (en banc) (discussing staff/line distinction and ramifications), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 1886 , 95 L.Ed.2d 494 (1987).
examined
Cited "see"
Smith v. Meese
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Olagues v. Russoniello, 797 F.2d 1511 (9th Cir.1986) (en banc), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 1885 , 95 L.Ed.2d 493 (1987).
examined
Cited "see"
Smith v. Meese
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Olagues v. Russoniello, 797 F.2d 1511 (9th Cir.1986) (en banc), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 1885 , 95 L.Ed.2d 493 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alex McLeczynsky
See McClain, 934 F.2d at 827 (intermediary between private individuals and public officers in illegal extortion scheme may be liable as co-conspirator); see also United States v. Wright, 797 F.2d 245, 252-53 (5th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 1887 , 95 L.Ed.2d 495 (1987) (participant in communicating, negotiating and collecting extortion demand properly charged with aiding and abetting under Hobbs Act).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. McLeczynsky, Alex
See McClain, 934 F.2d at 827 (inter- mediary between private individuals and public officers in illegal extortion scheme may be liable as co-conspirator); see also United States v. Wright, 797 F.2d 245, 252-53 (5th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 (1987) (partici- pant in communicating, negotiating and collecting extor- tion demand properly charged with aiding and abetting under Hobbs Act).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Darryl Freeman, Tyrone Netters
See, e.g., United States v. Wright, 797 F.2d 245, 249-50 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 1887 , 95 L.Ed.2d 495 (1987) (assistant city attorney); United States v. Rindone, 631 F.2d 491, 494-95 (7th Cir.1980) (municipal electrical inspector); United States v. Cerilli, 603 F.2d 415 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1043 , 100 S.Ct. 728 , 62 L.Ed.2d 728 (1980) (superintendent and assistant superintendents of state department of transportation); see also United States v. Ray, 690 F.Supp. 508, 510-12 (M.D.La.1988) (aide and assistant to the governor).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Suburban Motor Freight, Inc., Debtor. Stephen K. Yoder, Trustee v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation
Compare New Neighborhoods v. West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Fund, 886 F.2d 714 (4th Cir.1989) (West Virginia system is monopolistic and mandatory, thus premiums owed the State are excise taxes entitled to priority) with Brock v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 796 F.2d 481 (D.C.Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 1887 , 95 L.Ed.2d 494 (1987) and In re Metro Transportation Company, 117 B.R. 143 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1990) (holding that premiums are “fees” rather than taxes for bankruptcy purposes due to competition in Washington, D.C. and Pennsylvania workers�…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Idaho, Department of Finance v. Clarke
In Dimension, the Supreme Court observed that “§ 5 only permits the Board to police within the boundaries of the Act; it does not permit the Board to expand its jurisdiction beyond the boundaries established by Congress in § 2(c).” 474 U.S. at 373 n. 6, 106 S.Ct. at 688 n. 6; see also Florida Dep’t of Banking and Fin. v. Board of Governors, 800 F.2d 1534, 1536-37 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 1887 , 95 L.Ed.2d 494 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Idaho, Department of Finance v. Robert C. Clarke, in His Capacity as the Comptroller of the Currency U.S. Bancorp, an Oregon Corporation First National Bank, AKA U.S. Bank of Idaho, N.A., State of Idaho, Department of Finance v. Federal Reserve System, U.S. Bancorp, Intervenor
However, we do not affirm the Board's decision on this basis. 37 In Dimension, the Supreme Court observed that "s 5 only permits the Board to police within the boundaries of the Act; it does not permit the Board to expand its jurisdiction beyond the boundaries established by Congress in § 2(c)." 474 U.S. at 373 n. 6, 106 S.Ct. at 688 n. 6; see also Florida Dep't of Banking and Fin. v. Board of Governors, 800 F.2d 1534 , 1536-37 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 1887 , 95 L.Ed.2d 494 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles G. Stephens, Sr.
See United States v. Snyder, 930 F.2d 1090, 1093 (5th Cir.), later proceeding, 946 F.2d 1125 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 380 , 116 L.Ed.2d 331 (1991); see also 18 U.S.C. § 1951 . “[E]xtortion under color of official right means the wrongful taking by a public officer of money, or property not due to the officer or the office.” Snyder, 930 F.2d at 1093 ; see also United States v. Wright, 797 F.2d 245, 250 (5th Cir.) (“A conviction under the Hobbs Act may be sustained by a finding that a public official has taken a fee, unlawfully, under color of his public office,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph W. Pattan
See, e.g., United States v. Wright, 797 F.2d 245, 250 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1013 , 107 S.Ct. 1887 , 95 L.Ed.2d 495 (1987); United States v. Williams, 621 F.2d 123, 124 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 919 , 101 S.Ct. 1366 , 67 L.Ed.2d 346 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply System
See, e.g., Dahl v. Pinter, 787 F.2d 985, 991 (5th Cir.1986) (Texas test for seller liability substantially similar to Fifth Circuit substantial factor test), cert. granted, ___ U.S. ___, 95 L.Ed.2d 493 , 107 S.Ct. 1885 (1987); Huddleston v. Herman & MacLean, 640 F.2d 534, 550-51 (5th Cir.1981) (interpreting Texas Securities Act to impose liability on persons constituting a substantial factor in sale, noting that Texas statutory comments referred to section 12(2) as *130 model for state act and noting that the Fifth Circuit uses substantial factor test), rev'd on other grounds, 459 U.S. 375 (19…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHARLES G. STEPHENS, SR
See United States v. Snyder, 930 F.2d 1090, 1093 (5th Cir.), later proceeding, 946 F.2d 1125 (5th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, U.S. , 112 S. Ct. 380 (1991); see also 18 U.S.C. § 1951 . "[E]xtortion under color of official right means the wrongful taking by a public officer of money or property not due to the officer or the office." Snyder, 930 F.2d at 1093 ; see also United States v. Wright, 797 F.2d 245, 250 (5th Cir.) ("A conviction under the Hobbs Act may be sustained by a finding that a public official has taken a fee, unlawfully, under color of his -10- public office, in return for performa…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Continental Baking Co.
v.
Macon
v.
Macon
No. 85-1400.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1987.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.