green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Salvatore Salamone
But see United States v. Davis, 809 F.2d 1194, 1206 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3234 , 97 L.Ed.2d 740 (1987) (where defendant acquitted of charge of distributing heroin after raising defense of entrapment, government permitted to introduce evidence of heroin distribution in subsequent trial for conspiracy). 23 .
cited
Cited "see"
Michael Eugene Sharp v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
See Fransaw v. Lynaugh, 810 F.2d 518 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3237 , 97 L.Ed.2d 742 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Asplundh Manufacturing Division v. Benton Harbor Engineering
See WEINSTEIN, supra, p 701 4 United States v. Langford, 802 F.2d 1176, 1178-79 (9th Cir.1986) (admitting identification testimony with respect to persons depicted in a bank surveillance photograph), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3235 , 97 L.Ed.2d 740 (1987); United States v. Allen, 787 F.2d 933, 935-37 (4th Cir.1986) (same), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 944 , 109 S.Ct. 371 , 102 L.Ed.2d 360 (1988); United States v. Farnsworth, 729 F.2d 1158, 1160-61 (8th Cir.1984) (same); United States v. Jackson, 688 F.2d 1121, 1125 (7th Cir.1982) (same), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1043 , 103 S.Ct. 1441 , 75…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Reguer
See Fransaw v. Lynaugh, 810 F.2d 518, 525 (5th Cir.) (discussing eases), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3237 , 97 L.Ed.2d 742 (1987); see also Williams v. McMann, 436 F.2d 103 (2d Cir.1970) (affirming conviction on rein *524 stated indictment without discussing double jeopardy).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor Kirk Vaughn, AKA Victor Derwood Vaughn
See Theron, 849 F.2d at 480 (citing United States v. Thibodeaux, 811 F.2d 847, 848 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 5.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nicholas Sterner
See United States v. Langford, 802 F.2d 1176, 1180 (9th Cir.1986) (tenuous connection between extraneous information and jury insufficient to support a finding that such information could reasonably have affected the verdict), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 (1987); Steele, 785 F.2d at 749 (no prejudice to defendant based upon jury's unauthorized use of dictionary where record failed to show a reasonable possibility that extraneous information affected the verdict).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Manuel Garcia Bracamonte
See United States v. Langford, 802 F.2d 1176, 1178-79 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 (1987). 16 Because Bracamonte had been in prison for the two years preceding the robbery, it is likely that only prison guards or fellow inmates could testify to his appearance before the crime.
discussed
Cited "see"
RTC v. Alvin (In re Alvin)
See Fransaw v. Lynaugh, 810 F.2d 518, 523 (5th Cir.) ("[W]e will not consider [this issue] because of our well-established practice of refusing to address issues raised for the first time on appeal.”), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3237 , 97 L.Ed.2d 742 (1987). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Washington v. Washington
See Fransaw v. Lynaugh, 810 F.2d 518, 523 (5th Cir.) ("[W]e will not consider [this issue] because of our well-established practice of refusing to address issues raised for the first time on appeal."), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3237 , 97 L.Ed.2d 742 (1987) 5 See, e.g., In re Ireland, 137 B.R. 65, 70-71 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1992) (credit life and disability policies do not constitute "additional security" for section 1322(b)(2) purposes); In re Jackson, 136 B.R. 797, 800-801 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1992) (boilerplate language securing mortgage by insurance proceeds and fixtures in addition to re…
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Washington
See Fransaw v. Lynaugh, 810 F.2d 518, 523 (5th Cir.) ("[W]e will not consider [this issue] because of our well-established practice of refusing to address issues raised for the first time on appeal."), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3237 , 97 L.Ed.2d 742 (1987). 5 See, e.g., In re Ireland, 137 B.R. 65 , 70–71 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1992) (credit life and disability policies do not constitute "additional security" for section 1322(b)(2) purposes); In re Jackson, 136 B.R. 797 , 800–801 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1992) (boilerplate language securing mortgage by insurance proceeds and fixtures in additio…
discussed
Cited "see"
Omar Blanco, Cross-Appellant v. Harry K. Singletary, as Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida, Cross-Appellee
See Crutchfield v. Wainwright, 803 F.2d 1103, 1108 (11th Cir.1986) (en banc) (contrasting claim of ineffective assistance of counsel with claim of denial of assistance of counsel), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3235 , 97 L.Ed.2d 740 (1987). 69 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernest James Perkins
(2×)
See United States v. Langford, 802 F.2d 1176, 1180 (9th Cir.1986) (parole officer called to identify the defendant as the person in bank surveillance photographs), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3235 , 97 L.Ed.2d 740 (1987); United States v. Butcher, 557 F.2d 666, 669 (9th Cir.1977) (police and parole officer identification of defendant proper).
discussed
Cited "see"
James v. United States
See Towles v. United States, 521 A.2d 651, 655-56 (D.C.) (en banc) (where it was clear that counsel’s failure to pinpoint double jeopardy as basis for objection was tactical *643 choice, “tactics amounted to a waiving of double jeopardy”), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3236 , 97 L.Ed.2d 741 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Blanca Garcia-Rosa, United States of America v. Pedro Soto-Alvarez, A/K/A Junior, United States of America v. Angel Rivera-Feliciano, A/K/A Junior Azuquita, United States of America v. Victor Carrera-Perez, A/K/A Paye, United States of America v. Eduardo Rivera-Ortiz, United States of America v. Jose Heredia Nieves, A/K/A Checo El Perro
See Fransaw v. Lynaugh, 810 F.2d 518, 525 (5th Cir.) (noting that several of the appellate cases involving pretrial dismissals rested at least partially on the grounds that jeopardy had not attached to the dismissed count), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3237 , 97 L.Ed.2d 742 (1987); United States v. Vaughan, 715 F.2d 1373 , 1376 n. 2 (9th Cir.1983) (stating that when a defendant enters a plea of guilty to one of the crimes with which he has been charged, jeopardy ordinarily attaches only as to that crime upon acceptance of the plea by the court) 22 We reiterate our preference for rem…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Garcia-Rosa
See Fransaw v. Lynaugh, 810 F.2d 518, 525 (5th Cir.) (noting that several of the appellate cases involving pretrial dismissals rested at least partially on the grounds that jeopardy had not attached to the dismissed count), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3237 , 97 L.Ed.2d 742 (1987); United States v. Vaughan, 715 F.2d 1373 , 1376 n. 2 (9th Cir.1983) (stating that when a defendant enters a plea of guilty to one of the crimes with which he has been charged, jeopardy ordinarily attaches only as to that crime upon acceptance of the plea by the court). .
cited
Cited "see"
MICHAEL EUGENE SHARP v. GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
See Fransaw v. Lynaugh, 810 F.2d 518 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3237 , 97 L.Ed.2d 742 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Beverly A. Seymour v. Diane Walker,respondent-Appellee
See, e.g., Fransaw v. Lynaugh, 810 F.2d 518, 529 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3237 , 97 L.Ed.2d 742 (1987); United States v. Stolarz, 550 F.2d 488, 491-93 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 851 , 98 S.Ct. 162 , 54 L.Ed.2d 119 (1977); Asherman v. Meachum, 739 F.Supp. 718, 720-21 (D.Conn.) (Cabranes, J.) (citing cases), aff'd, 923 F.2d 845 (2d Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Woodard v. United States
R. 31(c) ("[t]he defendant may be found guilty of an offense necessarily included in the offense charged"); see also Towles v. United States, 521 A.2d 651, 657 (D.C.) ("The very concept of a ‘lesser-included’ offense ... is that when a defendant is charged by indictment with a serious felony he is automatically accused of the elements of less serious crimes which fall short of the major offense.”), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3236 , 97 L.Ed.2d 741 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sylvester Abrams v. Paul Barnett, Warden, Danville Correctional Center
See also Crutchfield v. Wainwright, 803 F.2d 1103, 1110 (11th Cir.1986) (recognizing that defendant or defense counsel must indicate desire to consult and stating that such a rule “satisfies [the] concern for the important constitutional right of assistance of counsel, provides for the orderly conduct of trials, and makes sense”), reh’g denied, 810 F.2d 208 (1987), cert. denied, Crutchfield v. Dugger, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3235 , 97 L.Ed.2d 740 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Ramon MATTA-BALLESTEROS, Defendant-Appellant
(2×)
United States v. Boylan, 898 F.2d 230, 258 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 849 , 111 S.Ct. 139 , 112 L.Ed.2d 106 (1990); see also United States v. Langford, 802 F.2d 1176, 1180 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3235 , 97 L.Ed.2d 740 (1987) (stating that "not every allegation that extraneous information has reached the jury requires a full-dress hearing.") The district court gave counsel transcripts from the in camera hearing and allowed them to submit proposed questions to the court.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stanwood
See, e.g., Fransaw v. Lynaugh, 810 F.2d 518, 523 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3237 , 97 L.Ed.2d 742 (1987); United States v. Williams, 534 F.2d 119, 120 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 894 , 97 S.Ct. 255 , 50 L.Ed.2d 177 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Angulo
See, e.g., United States v. Langford, 802 F.2d 1176, 1180 (9th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3235 , 97 L.Ed.2d 740 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joel Victor Angulo, United States of America v. Fidel Barragan Vargas, United States of America v. Octavio Galvez Angulo, United States of America v. Jaime Limon
See, e.g., United States v. Langford, 802 F.2d 1176, 1180 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3235 , 97 L.Ed.2d 740 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Albert Miranda
See, e.g., United States v. Langford, 802 F.2d 1176, 1179 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3235 , 97 L.Ed.2d 740 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Young v. New York City Transit Authority
See also People v. Tosch, 114 Ill.2d 474 , 103 Ill.Dec. 715 , 501 N.E.2d 1253 (1986) cert. denied 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3235 , 97 L.Ed.2d 740 (1987) (provisions which prohibited standing in a roadway and soliciting contributions except when permitted by municipal ordinance and provided that such solicitation could take place only at intersections where traffic came to a full stop and when the soliciting agency was registered with the Attorney General found to be a reasonable time, place and manner restriction). 28 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tosch
v.
Illinois
v.
Illinois
No. 86-6587.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 22, 1987.
Published
Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.