green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
9.8 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1994 ·
…in the context of an assignment of a patent, can agree verbally until the cows come home, and that patent isn't assigned until there's a writing.
⚠ not in text
cited 3× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1995 ·
…in the context of an assignment of a patent, they can agree verbally until the cows come home, and that patent isn't assigned until there's a writing
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Peeler
a per se rule of automatic reversal . . . properly vindicates the denial of the defendant's fundamental constitutional right to assistance of counsel guaranteed by the sixth amendment
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Paragon Trade Brands, Inc.
(3×)
in the context of an assignment of a patent, they can agree verbally until the cows come home, and that patent isn't assigned until there's a writing
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Valmet Paper MacHinery, Inc. v. Beloit Corp.
(3×)
in the context of an assignment of a patent, can agree verbally until the cows come home, and that patent isn't assigned until there's a writing.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Hamilton
a per se rule of automatic reversal . . . properly vindicates the denial of the defendant's fundamental constitutional right to assistance of counsel guaranteed by the sixth amendment
cited
Cited "see"
Morris v. Runyon
See Carlin v. McKean, 823 F.2d 620, 622 (D.C.Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1046 , 108 S.Ct. 784 , 98 L.Ed.2d 870 (1988).
examined
Cited "see"
Harry James Seagrave v. A.A. Gomez, Warden
(3×)
See United States v. Solomon, 825 F.2d 1292, 1295 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1046 , 108 S.Ct. 782 , 98 L.Ed.2d 868 (1988), Second, there was no juror confusion; the jury merely asked that the definitions be repeated and that they be given a copy to have with them in their deliberations.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Delphino Max Guevera
See United States v. Slaughter, 825 F.2d 1292, 1295 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1046 (1988). 6 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David McHenry United States of America v. John Gulde
See United States v. Solomon, 825 F.2d 1292, 1300 (9th Cir.1987) (remarks not excessive even when they suggested that the government knew of additional criminal violations by defendants because could be interpreted as comment on scope of conspiracy), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1046 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bernard L. Silver, Cartwright-Mitchell, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. United States Postal Service
(2×)
See Carlin v. McKean, 823 F.2d 620 , (D.C.Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, 484 U.S. 1046 , 108 S.Ct. 784 , 98 L.Ed.2d 870 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Maly
(2×)
See U.S. v. Solomon, 825 F.2d 1292 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied — U.S. —, 108 S.Ct. 782 , 98 L.Ed.2d 868 (1988) (failure of district court to affirma *374 tively state reasons for enhanced sentence required appellate court to vacate the sentence and remand for new sentencing).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William R. Hooks
(2×)
See United States v. Solomon, 825 F.2d 1292, 1298 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 782 , 98 L.Ed.2d 868 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cushard
See, e.g., State v. Meb- ane, 204 Conn. 585, 588, 595 , 529 A.2d 680 (1987) (rever- sal required when defendant was prevented from speaking with counsel during recess in midst of state’s cross-examination), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1046 , 108 S. Ct. 784 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Francis
See, e.g., State v. Mebane, 204 Conn. 585, 588, 595 , 529 A.2d 680 (1987) (reversal required when defendant was prevented from speaking with counsel during recess in midst of state’s cross-examination), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1046 , 108 S. Ct. 784 , 98 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Patterson
See also State v. Mebane, 204 Conn. 585 , 529 A.2d 680 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1046 , 108 S. Ct. 784 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eva R. Amundsen, United States of America v. Leon G. Hill, United States of America v. Wayne G. Hill, United States of America v. Hyrum J. Amundsen, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Solomon, 825 F.2d 1292, 1297 (9th Cir.1987) (defendants who are closely involved in the creation and operation of tax shelters can draw no support from Dahlstrom ), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1046 (1988). 2.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Campbell
See also Milhem v. United States, 834 F.2d 118, 122 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 783 , 98 L.Ed. 2d 868 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Taylor
v.
Henry Vogt Machine Co.
v.
Henry Vogt Machine Co.
No. 87-6016.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 25, 1988.
Cited by 28 opinions | Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.