green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 40 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mlinqs, LLC v. United States
the presumption of regularity provides that, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, the court will presume that public officers have properly discharged their official duties.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Szczerkowski v. Karmelowicz
t is in the sole province of the trier of fact to evaluate expert testimony, to assess its credibility, and to assign it a proper weight
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hines
Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97 , 105-106, 108, 54 S.Ct. 330 , 78 L.Ed. 674 (1934) ; see State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683 , 691-92, 529 A.2d 1245 (1987) (recognizing that right to be present similarly is guaranteed by article first, § 8, of our state constitution), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S.Ct. 1017 , 98 L.Ed.2d 982 (1988)." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Edwards, supra, 158 Conn.App. at 138 , 118 A.3d 615 . "[A trial] court may infer the defendant's waiver [of the right to be present] from the totality of his acts and conduct, so long as the defe…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Edwards
Ed. 674 (1934); see State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683 , 691–92, 529 A.2d 1245 (1987) (recognizing that right to be present similarly is guaran- teed by article first, § 8, of our state constitution), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S. Ct. 1017 , 98 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Devon D.
See State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683 , 529 A.2d 1245 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S. Ct. 1017 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Walker
Ed. 674 (1934); see State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683, 691-92 , 529 A.2d 1245 (1987) (recognizing that right to be present similarly is guaranteed by article first, § 8, of our state constitution), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S. Ct. 1017 , 98 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ruiz
See State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683, 684-85 , 529 A.2d 1245 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S. Ct. 1017 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Chambers
Ed. 674 (1934); see State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683, 691-92 , 529 A.2d 1245 (1987) (recognizing that right to be present similarly is guaranteed by article first, § 8, of our state constitution), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S. Ct. 1017 , 98 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Zapata
See id., citing State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683, 691-92 , 529 A.2d 1245 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S. Ct. 1017 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Johnson
See State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683, 692-93 , 529 A.2d 1245 (1987) (confrontation clause “finds its modem justification in the perceived role that physical confrontation plays in the truth-seeking process”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S. Ct. 1017 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jones
Ed. 674 (1934); see State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683, 691-92 , 529 A.2d 1245 (1987) (recognizing that right to be present similarly is guaranteed by article first, § 8, of our state constitution), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S. Ct. 1017 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Sam
Ed. *25 674 (1934); see State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683, 691-92 , 529 A.2d 1245 (1987) (recognizing that right to be present similarly is guaranteed by article first, § 8, of our state constitution), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S. Ct. 1017 , 98 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dews
See State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683, 704-705 , 529 A.2d 1245 (1987), cert, denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S. Ct. 1017 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lopez
Ed. 674 (1934); see State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683, 691-92 , 529 A.2d 1245 (1987) (recognizing that right to be present similarly is guaranteed by article first, § 8, of our state constitution), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S. Ct. 1017 , 98 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Gombert
See State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683, 704-705 , 529 A.2d 1245 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S. Ct. 1017 , 98 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Davis
See State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683 , 529 A.2d 1245 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S. Ct. 1017 , 98 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Montini
See State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683 , 686 n.2, 529 A.2d 1245 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S. Ct. 1017 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rabadi
(2×)
See United States v. Nersesian, 824 F.2d 1294 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 958 , 108 S.Ct. 357 , 98 L.Ed.2d 382 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S.Ct. 1018 , 98 L.Ed.2d 983 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Morgan
United States v. Welch, 25 MJ 23, 25 (CMA 1987); see United States v. Nelson, 25 MJ 110, 112 (CMA 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S.Ct. 1016 , 98 L.Ed.2d 982 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Connecticut Coastal Fishermen's Ass'n v. Remington Arms Co.
See United States v. Cumberland Farms of Conn., Inc., 826 F.2d 1151, 1162 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S.Ct. 1016 , 98 L.Ed.2d 981 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Connecticut Coastal Fishermen's Association v. Remington Arms Co.
See United States v. Cumberland Farms of Conn., Inc., 826 F.2d 1151, 1162 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S.Ct. 1016 , 98 L.Ed.2d 981 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Levitt
See United States v. Odegard, 25 MJ 140 (CMA 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S.Ct. 1017 , 98 L.Ed.2d 982 (1988); United States v. Dicupe, 21 MJ 440 (CMA), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 826 , 107 S.Ct. 101 , 93 L.Ed.2d 52 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chapman v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. McGeehan, 824 F. 2d 677, 681 (CA8 1987), cert. denied, 484 U. S. 1061 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Hoffman Group, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency
See United States v. *569 Cumberland Farms of Connecticut, Inc., 826 F.2d 1151 (1st Cir.1987), certiorari denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S.Ct. 1016 , 98 L.Ed.2d 981 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bonello
Public Acts 1985, No. 85-587; see State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683 , 686 n.2, 529 A.2d 1245 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S. Ct. 1017 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barlow v. Comm'r of Corr.
Second, and more significantly, this case highlights the need for our appellate courts, in crafting remand orders, to be cognizant of disputes that might arise over the application of § 51-183c, in particular the need for clarity and consistency between the opinion and the **614 rescript. 4 As the Appellate Court recognized; see Barlow II , supra, 166 Conn. App. at 424 -25 , 142 A.3d 290 ; one way a reviewing court may remand a case to the original trial judge for additional proceedings without either triggering § 51-183c or a dispute over its application is by not disturbing the original ju…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Campbell
See, e.g., State v. Jarzbek , 204 Conn. 683 , 706, 529 A.2d 1245 (1987) ("[it] is in the sole province of the trier of fact to evaluate expert testimony, to assess its credibility, and to assign it a proper weight"), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S.Ct. 1017 , 98 L.Ed. 2d 982 (1988). "[W]hen a question of fact is essential to the outcome of a particular legal determination that implicates a defendant's constitutional rights, [however] ... our customary deference to the trial court's factual findings is tempered by a scrupulous examination of the record to ascertain that the trial court's fa…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lapointe v. Commissioner of Correction
As a result, our law recognizes the importance of demeanor evidence as a tool for evaluating an expert witness’ credibility. ‘‘Expert testimony is considered, weighed and tested like any other evidence.’’ Aspiazu v. Orgera, 205 Conn. 623, 634 , 535 A.2d 338 (1987); see also State v. Joly, 219 Conn. 234, 243 , 593 A.2d 96 (1991) (‘‘the fact that a witness testifies as an expert does not compel the acceptance of his or her testimony as true’’). ‘‘It is in the sole province of the trier of fact to evaluate expert testimony, to assess its credibility, and to assign it a prope…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hargrove v. SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICIAL DIST. OF TOLLAND AT ROCKVILLE
Ed. 2d 112 (2007); see also State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683, 687-98 , 529 A.2d 1245 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S. Ct. 1017 , 98 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kelly
See, e.g., State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683, 706 , 529 A.2d 1245 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S. Ct. 1017 , 98 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Massachusetts Food Ass'n v. Sullivan
See also Miller v. Hedlund, 813 F.2d 1344, 1351 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S.Ct. 1018 , 98 L.Ed.2d 983 (1988) (invalidating as hybrid a similar Oregon statute).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Canterbury Liquors & Pantry v. Sullivan
Compare Miller v. Hedlund, 813 F.2d 1344, 1351 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S.Ct. 1018 , 98 L.Ed.2d 983 (1988) (invalidating comparable regulatory scheme) with Battipaglia v. New York State Liquor Auth., 745 F.2d 166, 175 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1027 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985) (upholding similar regulatory scheme).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Restrepo
See, e.g., United States v. Thompson, 29 F.3d 62, 65 (2d Cir.1994); Scopo, 19 F.3d at 782 (rejecting “usual police practices” test, which considers whether the violation is of the type normally acted on by officers, in favor of “authorization” test, which considers whether there was a valid basis for the arrest); United States v. Ferguson, 8 F.3d 385, 392 (6th Cir.1993) (“[T]raffic stops based on probable cause, even if other motivations existed, are not illegal.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 97 , 130 L.Ed.2d 47 (1994); see also United States v. Nersesian, 824 F.2d 1294, 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Brace Robert Brace Farms, a Pennsylvania Corporation
See also United States v. Cumberland Farms, 647 F.Supp. 1166, 1176 (D.Mass.1986) (“[E]ven if [defendant] could establish that it is exempt from the permit requirements under § 1344(f)(1), it must also demonstrate that its activities avoid ‘recapture’ under the provisions of 33 U.S.C. § 1344 (f)(2).”), aff'd, 826 F.2d .1151 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S.Ct. 1016 , 98 L.Ed.2d 981 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brighton Village Associates v. United States
A corollary principle is that, to the extent complete relief is not made available under a specific contract provision, a controversy is not subject to administrative determination via the Disputes clause and may be tried de novo in the proper court. [Emphasis added.] Id. (citing Len Co. & Assoc. v. United States, 385 F.2d 438 , 181 Ct.Cl. 29, 36 (1967); see also, Gregory Lumber Co. v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 503, 519 (1986), aff'd, 831 F.2d 305 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S.Ct. 1016 , 98 L.Ed.2d 982 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Medina
Although expert witnesses testified on behalf of the defendant and the state called none, that alone is not a sufficient basis to disturb the verdict on appeal; see, e.g., State v. Evans, 203 Conn. 212, 237-38 , 523 A.2d 1306 (1987); State v. Perez, supra, 608-10 ; for the jury “can disbelieve any or all of the evidence on insanity and can construe that evidence in a manner different from the parties’ assertions.” State v. Steiger, supra, 381 ; see also State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683, 707 , 529 A.2d 1245 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S. Ct. 1017 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Medina
Although expert witnesses testified on behalf of the defendant and the state called none, that alone is not a sufficient basis to disturb the verdict on appeal; see, e.g., State v. Evans, 203 Conn. 212, 237-38 , 523 A.2d 1306 (1987); State v. Perez, supra, 608-10 ; for the jury “can disbelieve any or all of the evidence on insanity and can construe that evidence in a manner different from the parties’ assertions.” State v. Steiger, supra, 381 ; see also State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683, 707 , 529 A.2d 1245 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S. Ct. 1017 , 98 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gyan Parkash Syal
See also United States v. McGeehan, 824 F.2d 677 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, sub nom Jovanovic v. United States, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S.Ct. 1017 , 98 L.Ed.2d 982 (1988) (confusion in warning defendant of maximum sentence, including failure to tell him he could have a life special parole term, held to be harmless error when defendant was sentenced to only three-years special parole term, and had been told he faced a three year special parole term).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles D. Scanio
See, e.g., United States v. Heyman, 794 F.2d 788, 790-93 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 585 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986); United States v. Thompson, 603 F.2d 1200, 1202-04 (5th Cir.1979); United States v. Tobon-Builes, 706 F.2d 1092, 1096-1101 (11th Cir.1983); see also United States v. Nersesian, 824 F.2d 1294, 1309-15 (2d Cir.) (applying law in effect prior to January 1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 957 , 958, 108 S.Ct. 355 , 357, 98 L.Ed.2d 380, 382 (1987), 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S.Ct. 1018 , 98 L.Ed.2d 983 (1988); United States v. American Investors of Pittsburgh, Inc., 879 F.2d 10…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bullock
(2×)
See also State v. Jarzbek, 204 Conn. 683, 708 , 529 A.2d 1245, 1257 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S.Ct. 1017 , 98 L.Ed.2d 982 (1988) (videotaping procedure outside of presence of defendant is permissible if there is clear and convincing evidence of a compelling need). [10] The trial court entered the following findings, based almost exclusively on the testimony of Dr. Ann Tyler, one of the prosecution's expert witnesses at trial, regarding the mental and emotional condition of each of the four boys: The COURT WOULD FIND relative to [Bill], and generally as to all of these young men…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jensen
v.
Satran, Warden
v.
Satran, Warden
No. 87-863.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1988.
484 U.S. 1061
Published
Citer courts: Connecticut Appellate Court (1) · Federal Claims (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.