Colahan v. United States, 484 U.S. 818 (1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Colahan v. United States, 484 U.S. 818 (1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · "The antitrust plaintiff is required to define the relevant product market in terms of goods that are "reasonably interchangeable" with the goods at issue."
28 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re Pool Products Distribution Market Antitrust Litigation (laed, 2013-04-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In re Pool Products Distribution Market Antitrust Litigation
E.D. La. · 2013 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the antitrust plaintiff is required to define the relevant product market in terms of goods that are "reasonably interchangeable" with the goods at issue.
cited Cited "see" First Bank v. State, Department of Regulatory Agencies, Division of Banking
Colo. Ct. App. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Telegraph Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Schilling, 807 F.2d 590 *1352 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 818 , 108 S.Ct. 73 , 98 L.Ed.2d 37 (1987).
cited Cited "see" West River Electric Association, Inc. v. Black Hills Power and Light Company, and Ellsworth Air Force Base. Black Hills Power and Light Company v. Heartland Consumers Power District, West River Electric Association, Inc. v. Black Hills Power and Light Company, and Ellsworth Air Force Base. In the Matter of the Complaint of West River Electric Association, Inc., Against Black Hills Power and Light Company and Ellsworth Air Force Base. In the Matter of the Complaint of Black Hills Power and Light Company Against Heartland Consumers Power District With Regard to Electric Service to Ellsworth Air Force Base. West River Electric Association, Inc. v. Black Hills Power and Light Company and Ellsworth Air Force Base, West River Electric Association, Inc. v. Black Hills Power and Light Company and Ellsworth Air Force Base, West River Electric Association, Inc. v. Black Hills Power and Light Company and Ellsworth Air Force Base, Black Hills Power and Light Company v. Heartland Consumers Power District. In the Matter of the Complaint of West River Electric Association, Inc., Against Black Hills Power and Light Company and Ellsworth Air Force Base. In the Matter of the Complaint of Black Hills Power and Light Company Against Heartland Consumers Power District With Regard to Electric Service to Ellsworth Air Force Base
8th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Black Hills Power & Light Co. v. Weinberger, 808 F.2d 665 (8th Cir.) ("Weinberger"), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 818 , 108 S.Ct. 73 , 98 L.Ed.2d 36 (1987).
cited Cited "see" West River Electric Ass'n v. Black Hills Power & Light Co.
8th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Black Hills Power & Light Co. v. Weinberger, 808 F.2d 665 (8th Cir.) (“ Weinberger*’), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 818 , 108 S.Ct. 73 , 98 L.Ed.2d 36 (1987).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Greening v. Moran
C.D. Ill. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Madden v. Cronson, 114 Ill.2d 504 , 103 Ill.Dec. 729 , 501 N.E.2d 1267 (1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 818 , 108 S.Ct. 73 , 98 L.Ed.2d 36 (1987); Chicago Bar Association v. Cronson, 183 Ill.App.3d 710 , 132 Ill.Dec. 17 , 539 N.E.2d 327 (1st Dist. 1989), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 867 , 107 L.Ed.2d 950 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Colahan, dba IBA of Ohio
v.
United States
No. 86-1783.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1987.
484 U.S. 818
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 64%
Citer courts: E.D. Louisiana (1)

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.