green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.1 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jeremy Houston v. State
the fact that a witness cannot 9 give a positive identification of another person goes to the weight of his testimony, not to its admissibility; therefore, the lack of positive identification is a jury issue.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Joint Apprenticeship Committee of the Joint Industry Board of the Electrical Industry
for purposes of prima facie case, ... the issue is not why the has a discriminatory impact, rather the issue is simply whether it had such an impact.
discussed
Cited "see"
Raymond Charles White v. State
See Livingston v. State, 739 S.W.2d 311, 327 (Tex.Crim.App.1987) (“[W]here a person voluntarily accompanies investigating police officers to a certain location, and he knows or should know that the police officers suspect that he may have committed or may be implicated in committing a crime, that person is not ‘restrained’ or ‘in custody.’ ”), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2858 , 101 L.Ed.2d 895 (1988); Miller v. State, 196 S.W.3d 256, 266 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2006, pet. ref'd) (reasoning that appellant’s choice to voluntarily meet with police demonstrated that police e…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Martinez
(2×)
Our concern is that the indigent defendant have access to a competent psychiatrist for the purpose we have discussed, and as in the case of the provision of counsel we leave to the States the decision of how to implement this right." While Ake focused on an indigent defendant's right of access to a psychiatric expert, similar reasoning has been applied at the federal circuit court level to require provision of a hypnosis expert; see Little v. Armontrout, 835 F.2d 1240 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 894 (1988); and a battered spouse syndrome expert; s…
discussed
Cited "see"
Jimmy Lawton Elmore v. State
App. 1987), cert. denied , 487 U.S. 1210 (1988). 11: See id. 12: James v. State , 102 S.W.3d 162, 179 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, pet. filed). 13: See Rankin v. State , 974 S.W.2d 707 , 712 n.3 (Tex. Crim.
discussed
Cited "see"
Susan Lea Elmore v. State
App. 1987), cert. denied , 487 U.S. 1210 (1988). 16: See id. 17: James v. State , 102 S.W.3d 162, 179 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, pet. filed). 18: See Rankin v. State , 974 S.W.2d 707 , 712 n.3 (Tex. Crim.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lockett v. Anderson
(2×)
See 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2858 , 101 L.Ed.2d 895 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arthur Schuyler Ross, United States of America v. Arthur Schuyler Ross, Also Known as John Ross
See Little v. Armontrout, 835 F.2d 1240, 1244 (8th Cir.1987) (en banc), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L,Ed.2d 894 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arthur Ross
See Little v. Armontrout, 835 F.2d 1240, 1244 (8th Cir. 1987) (en banc), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tyson v. Keane
See Little v. Armotrout, 835 F.2d 1240, 1243-44 (8th Cir.1987) (applying Ake’s analysis to determine whether an indigent defendant was entitled to a hypnotic expert), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 894 (1988); Moore v. Kemp, 809 F.2d 702, 709-12 (11th Cir.) (en banc) (applying Ake’s analysis to determine whether an indigent defendant was entitled to a “criminologist or other expert witness”), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1054 , 107 S.Ct. 2192 , 95 L.Ed.2d 847 (1987); see also Barnard v. Henderson, 514 F.2d 744, 746 (5th Cir.1975) (habeas petition granted because p…
discussed
Cited "see"
Rosenberg v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
See United States v. Alabama, 828 F.2d 1532, 1543-46 (11th Cir.1987) (holding recusal mandatory under § 455(b)(1) where trial judge who had served as a state senator and private lawyer had actively participated in the very events and shaped the very facts that were in issue in the suit or involved himself in the disputed evidentiary facts of the case), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 894 (1988). 3 Indeed, courts have not inferred bias or prejudice even where a trial judge had a prior lawyer-client relationship with a particular- party.
cited
Cited "see"
Davis v. State
See Lockett v. State, 517 So.2d 1346 , 1353 (Miss. 1987), cert. denied, Lockett v. Mississippi, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2858 , 101 L.Ed.2d 895 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Darden
See United States v. Jones, 880 F.2d 55, 62-63 (8th Cir.1989). “[I]t is not necessary that every defendant have participated in or be charged with each offense.” Id. (quoting United States v. O’Connell, 841 F.2d 1408 , 1431 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 893 (1988) and 488 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 799 , 102 L.Ed.2d 790 (1989)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carlton Darden, United States of America v. Carla Simone Seals, United States of America v. Michael Williams, United States of America v. Raymond Amerson, United States of America v. Gerald Douglas Hopkins, United States of America v. Jerry Lee Lewis, United States of America v. Noble Laverne Bennett
See United States v. Jones, 880 F.2d 55, 62-63 (8th Cir.1989). "[I]t is not necessary that every defendant have participated in or be charged with each offense." Id. (quoting United States v. O'Connell, 841 F.2d 1408 , 1431 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 893 (1988) and 488 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 799 , 102 L.Ed.2d 790 (1989)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joan S. Borawick v. Morrie Shay and Christine Shay
See Little v. Armontrout, 819 F.2d 1425, 1429 (8th Cir.), aff'd, 835 F.2d 1240 (8th Cir.1987) (en banc), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 894 (1988); Harker, 800 F.2d at 439 ; United States v. Valdez, 722 F.2d 1196, 1200 (5th Cir.1984); Scientific Affairs, supra, at 1920.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. I.I. Ozar Larry J. Bridges Sherman W. Dreiseszun
See United States v. O’Connell, 841 F.2d 1408 , 1416 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 893 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Brabson
See Livingston v. State, 739 S.W.2d 311, 326 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), ce rt. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2858 , 101 L.Ed.2d 895 (1988); Dickey v. State, 716 S.W.2d 499 , 503-04 n. 4 (Tex.Crim.App.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Guess
See Lockett v. State, 517 So. (2d) 1346 (Miss. 1987), cert, denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2858 , 101 L.Ed. (2d) 895 (1988), and cases cited therein.
cited
Cited "see"
Carr v. State
See Lockett v. State, 517 So.2d 1346, 1349 (Miss. 1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2858 , 101 L.Ed.2d 895 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Larry Branscomb v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
See Little v. Armontrout, 835 F.2d 1240, 1244 (8th Cir.1987) (en bane), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 894 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Twan J. James, Ernest Parker, Reginald G. Allison, Yvonne R. Ferguson, and Walter Williams
See United States v. O’Connell, 841 F.2d 1408 , 1426 (8th Cir.1988) (intercepted telephone calls demonstrated that defendant arranged drug transactions while in prison and thus knowingly contributed to furtherance of conspiracy), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 893 (1988), 488 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 799 , 102 L.Ed.2d 790 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Mock v. State
See Livingston v. State, 739 S.W.2d 311, 335 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2858 , 101 L.Ed.2d 895 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hopper
(2×)
See Livingston v. State, 739 S.W.2d 311, 326 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2858 , 101 L.Ed.2d 895 (1988); Dickey v. State, 716 S.W.2d 499 , 503-04 n. 4 (Tex.Crim.App.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Jeffrey Keller Davis v. State of Mississippi
See Lockett v. State, 517 So. 2d 1346, 1353 (Miss. 1987), cert. denied, Lockett v. Mississippi, 487 U.S. 1210 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Mathes
(2×)
See Livingston v. State, 739 S.W.2d 311, 340 (Tex.Cr.App.1987) cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2858 , 101 L.Ed.2d 895 (1988); Landry v. State, 706 S.W.2d 105, 112-113 (Tex.Cr.App.1985) cert. denied, 479 U.S. 871 , 107 S.Ct. 242 , 93 L.Ed.2d 167 (1986); Demouchette v. State, 591 S.W.2d 488, 491-492 (Tex.Cr.App.1979) cert. denied, 453 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 3146 , 69 L.Ed.2d 996 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Twenter
(2×)
See Little v. Armontrout, 835 F.2d 1240 (1987), cert. denied 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 894 (1988).
examined
Cited "see"
Paul Kordenbrock v. Gene Scroggy, Warden, Kentucky State Penitentiary
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Little v. Armontrout, 835 F.2d 1240 (8th Cir.1987) (en banc), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 894 (1988); Moore v. Kemp, 809 F.2d 702, 711-12 (11th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1054 , 107 S.Ct. 2192 , 95 L.Ed.2d 847 (1987) (Eleventh Circuit "assume[d], for sake of argument, that the due process clause could require the government, both state and federal, to provide nonpsychiatric expert assistance to an indigent defendant upon a sufficient showing of need."). 68 In Little, the Eighth Circuit held that the indigent defendant in that case was entitled to…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marion Johnson, Marshall Johnson, Willie Lee Dancy
See United States v. O’Connell, 841 F.2d 1408 , 1433 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 893 (1988); United States v. Stackpole, 811 F.2d 689, 694 (1st Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Claude Sella v. State
Compare Livingston v. State, 739 S.W.2d 311, 338 (Tex.Crim.App. 1987) (prosecutor’s comment on appellant’s power of subpoena to call witnesses to explain his actions “did not refer to some particular aspect of the case that only appellant’s testimony could refute” or call into question appellant’s right to remain passive), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 (1988), with Crocker v. State, 248 S.W.3d 299 , 304–05 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, pet. ref’d) (prosecutor’s reference to defendant’s power of subpoena drew attention to absence of evidence that only defendant could su…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jacobson v. Anderson
See, e.g., Little v. Armontrout, 835 F.2d 1240, 1243 (8th Cir.1987)(refusal to appoint expert to assist indigent defendant rendered trial fundamentally unfair and required rape conviction to be set aside), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 894 (1988); Mason v. Arizona, 504 F.2d 1345, 1351-52 (9th Cir.1974)(Due Process Clause “requires, when necessary, the allowance of investigative expenses or appointment of investigative assistance for indigent defendants in order to insure effective preparation of their defense by their attorneys” depending “upon the need as re…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Republic of Panama v. American Tobacco Co.
Id. at 835-36 , 93 S.Ct. 7 ; see also United States v. Alabama, 828 F.2d 1532, 1542 (11th Cir.1987) (rejecting, in an action challenging segregation in education, disqualification of a district judge on the basis of his background as a civil rights lawyer representing black plaintiffs and stating “[a] judge is not required to recuse himself merely because he holds and has expressed certain views on a general subject.”), cer t. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 894 (1988); Shaw v. Martin, 733 F.2d 304, 316 (4th Cir.) (“One who has voted as a legislator in favor of a sta…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Republic of Panama v. Amer Tobacco Co Inc
Id. at 835-36 ; see also United States v. Alabama, 828 F.2d 1532, 1542 (11th Cir. 1987) (rejecting, in an action challenging segregation in education, disqualification of a district judge on the basis of his background as a civil rights lawyer representing black plaintiffs and stating "[a] judge is not required to recuse himself merely because he holds and has expressed certain views on a general subject."), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 (1988); Shaw v. Martin, 733 F.2d 304, 325 (4th Cir.) ("One who has voted as a legislator in favor of a statute permitting the death penalty in a proper case can…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Husske v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See, e.g., Little v. Armontrout, 835 F.2d 1240, 1243-44 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 894 (1988); Moore v. Kemp, 809 F.2d 702, 709-12 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1054 , 107 S.Ct. 2192 , 95 L.Ed.2d 847 (1987); Thornton v. State, 255 Ga. 434 , 339 S.E.2d 240, 241 (1986); Harrison v. State, 644 N.E.2d 1243, 1252-53 (Ind.1995); Kennedy v. State, 578 N.E.2d 633, 639-40 (Ind.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 921 , 112 S.Ct. 1299 , 117 L.Ed.2d 521 (1992); State v. Coker, 412 N.W.2d 589, 592-93 (Iowa 1987); Polk v. State, 612 So.2d 381, 393-94 (Miss.199…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of AA
See Thomas v. State, 621 S.W.2d 158, 161 (Tex.Crim.App.1980) (op. on reh'g); Gantz v. State, 661 S.W.2d 213, 222 (Tex. App.San Antonio 1983, pet. ref'd); see also Livingston v. State, 739 S.W.2d 311, 321 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2858 , 101 L.Ed.2d 895 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
A.A., Matter Of
See Thomas v. State, 621 S.W.2d 158, 161 (Tex.Crim.App.1980) (op. on reh’g); Gantz v. State, 661 S.W.2d 213, 222 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1983, pet. ref'd); see also Livingston v. State, 739 S.W.2d 311, 321 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2858 , 101 L.Ed.2d 895 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Renteria v. Schellpeper
See e.g., United States v. State of Alabama, 828 F.2d 1532, 1543 (11th Cir.1987) cert. denied 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 894 (1988) (prior experience of trial judge in representing black plaintiffs in race discrimination suits was no basis for disqualification in school desegregation case because “[a]ll judges come to the bench with a background of experiences, associations and viewpoints.”); Patterson v. Masem, 774 F.2d 251 , 254 n. 2 (8th Cir.1985) (trial judge was not disqualified when his prior law firm participated in similar civil rights case in which certain partie…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cornejo v. State
See e.g., Livingston v. State, 739 S.W.2d 311, 328 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2858 , 101 L.Ed.2d 895 (1988) (holding that arrest of suspect was supported by eyewitness identification of suspect by assailant at scene of crime).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Smith
See United States v. Schubel, 912 F.2d 952, 956 (8th Cir.1990) (noting that circumstantial evidence may suffice to support a jury verdict); see also United States v. O’Connell, 841 F.2d 1408 , 1424 (8th Cir.) (upholding drug conspiracy conviction), ce rt. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 893 (1988), and cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 799 , 102 L.Ed.2d 790 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward Jerico Smith, Also Known as Rico Smith, United States of America v. Harold McMillan United States of America v. Cassell Ali Bobo, Also Known as Louis Taylor, United States of America v. Courtney Bernard Gardner, United States of America v. Donald Cornelius Gardner, United States of America v. Dexter Darron Carr, Also Known as Darron Dexter Carr, Also Known as Dex
See United States v. Schubel, 912 F.2d 952, 956 (8th Cir.1990) (noting that circumstantial evidence may suffice to support a jury verdict); see also United States v. O'Connell, 841 F.2d 1408 , 1424 (8th Cir.) (upholding drug conspiracy conviction), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 893 (1988), and cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 799 , 102 L.Ed.2d 790 (1989). 25 We also find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing officer Thomas Rice to testify about an October 1991 undercover purchase of cocaine base involving Smith.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Norman L. Young, Clyde Edward Young, Jr., A/K/A Peanuts, Clyde E. Young, Sr., A/K/A Red, Lucious Levon Banks, A/K/A Junior Banks, David Young, United States of America v. Patricia Young
Compare United States v. State of Alabama, 828 F.2d 1532, 1544-46 (11th Cir.1987) ("During his tenure in the state legislature, the trial judge actively participated in the very events and shaped the very facts that are at issue in this suit ... [t]o permit [a judge] to decide a case in which he had extra-judicial, personal knowledge of disputed facts would be contrary to the express language and underlying spirit of the statute, as well as the case law."), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 894 (1988); Parker v. Connors Steel Co., 855 F.2d 1510, 1523-24 (11th Cir.1988)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Young
Compare United States v. State of Alabama, 828 F.2d 1532, 1544-46 (11th Cir.1987) (“During his tenure in the state legislature, the trial judge actively participated in the very events and shaped the very facts that are at issue in this suit ... [t]o permit [a judge] to decide a case in which he had extra-judicial, personal knowledge of disputed facts would be contrary to the express language and underlying spirit of the statute, as well as the case law.”), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 894 (1988); Parker v. Connors Steel Co., 855 F.2d 1510, 1523-24 (11th Cir.1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
El Fenix De Puerto Rico v. the M/Y Johanny
(2×)
No permissible reading of subsection 455(a) would suggest that Congress intended to allow a litigant to compel disqualification simply on unfounded innuendo concerning the possible partiality of the presiding judge. 4 Indeed, “[a] trial judge must hear cases unless some reasonable factual basis to doubt the impartiality of the tribunal is shown by some kind of probative evidence.” Blizard v. Frechette, 601 F.2d 1217, 1221 (1st Cir.1979) (emphasis added); see also United States v. Alabama, 828 F.2d 1532, 1541 (11th Cir.1987) (noting that following enactment of current version of § 455 in 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
El Fenix v. The M
See, e.g., United States v. Alabama, 828 F.2d ___ ____ _____________ _______ 1532, 1543-46 (11th Cir. 1987) (holding recusal mandatory under 455(b)(1) where trial judge's activities had involved him in "disputed evidentiary facts"), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 _____ ______ (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ellis v. State
Carrillo v. State, 566 *385 S.W.2d 902, 912 (Tex.Crim.App.1978); Reynolds v. State, 848 S.W.2d 785, 790 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, pet. ref'd); see also Livingston v. State, 739 S.W.2d 311, 337-38 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2858 , 101 L.Ed.2d 895 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Engberg v. Meyer
(2×)
See also Little v. Armontrout, 835 F.2d 1240 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 894 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stephens v. State
See also Lockett v. State , 517 So.2d 1346 (Miss. 1987) cert. denied , 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2858 , 101 L.Ed.2d 895 (1988) (wearing of hat, hostility toward prosecution, desire not to serve because of invalid parent); Taitano v. Commonwealth , 4 Va. App. 342 , 358 S.E.2d 590 (1987) (age, dress, demeanor); Chambers v. State , 724 S.W.2d 440 (Tex.Ct.App. 1987) *Page 20 (age, body english); Townsend v. State , 730 S.W.2d 24 (Tex.Ct.App. 1987) (inattentiveness); Smith v. State , 734 S.W.2d 694 (Tex.Ct.App. 1987) (excessive jewelry).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Meek v. State
Several State cases are also on point: Shiflet v. State, 732 S.W.2d 622 (Tex.Cr.App.1985); Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779 (Tex.Cr.App.1987); Brown v. State, 475 S.W.2d 938 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Dancy v. State, 728 S.W.2d 772 (Tex.Cr.App.1987); see also Livingston v. State, 739 S.W.2d 311 (Tex.Cr.App.1987), cert. den., Livingston v. Texas, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2858 , 101 L.Ed.2d 895 (1988); Arredondo v. State, 694 S.W.2d 378 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi, 1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clemons v. Mississippi
See, e. g., Lockett v. State, 517 So. 2d 1317 (1987), cert. denied, 487 U. S. 1210 (1988); Jones v. State, supra; Wiley v. State, supra; Booker v. State, supra; Irving v. State, 441 So. 2d 846 (1983); Gilliard v. State, 428 So. 2d 576 , cert. denied, 464 U. S. 867 (1983); Evans v. State, supra; Johnson v. State, 416 So. 2d 383 (1982); Edwards v. State, 441 So. 2d 84 (1983); Caldwell v. State, 443 So. 2d 806 (1983), rev’d on other grounds, 472 U. S. 320 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Foster
v.
Wells, Warden
v.
Wells, Warden
No. 87-6968.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 20, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1) · Court of Appeals of Texas (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.