green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.4 score
“he travel act does not mandate that the defendant place the telephone call to warrant a violation of the act.”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Wayne Rodney Heim, Dyan Jones, Steven Robert Britenbach, Dwayne Keith Fitzen
he travel act does not mandate that the defendant place the telephone call to warrant a violation of the act.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Colon
Harris v. State, 306 Md. 344, 359 , 509 A.2d 120 (1986) (“under the common law applicable to capital sentencing proceedings at the time [the defendant] was sentenced, a defendant who timely asserts his right to allocute, and provides an acceptable proffer, must be afforded a fair opportunity to exercise this right”); Homick v. State, 108 Nev. 127, 133-34 , 825 P.2d 600 (1992) (concluding that capital defendants enjoy common-law right of allocution, limited to expressions of remorse, pleas for leniency and plans or hopes for future); see State v. Zola, 112 N.J. 384, 431-32 , 548 A.2d 1022 (…
discussed
Cited "see"
Black v. State
See U.S. v. Molina-Uribe, 853 F.2d 1193, 1204 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 , 109 S.Ct. 1145 , 103 L.Ed.2d 205 (1989), overruled on other grounds by, U.S. v. Bachynsky, 934 F.2d 1349 (5th Cir.1991). 16 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bey
(2×)
State v. Loftin, 146 N.J. 295, 362 , 680 A.2d 677 (1996) (Loftin I); see State v. Zola, 112 N.J. 384, 429-30 , 548 A.2d 1022 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 , 109 S.Ct. 1146 , 103 L.Ed.2d 205 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dennis
See State v. Zola, 548 A.2d 1022 (N.J. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 , 103 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Harvey
(2×)
See State v. Zola, 112 N.J. 384, 426 , 548 A.2d 1022 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 , 109 S.Ct. 1146 , 103 L.Ed.2d 205 (1989); Koedatich I, supra, 112 N.J. at 324-25, 548 A.2d 939 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Marshall
(2×)
See State v. Zola, 112 N.J. 384, 418 , 548 A.2d 1022 (1988) (“By enabling each party to be informed of the other’s case, our rules of discovery ensure fairness and avoid unfair surprise.”), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 , 109 S.Ct. 1146 , 103 L.Ed.2d 205 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Ligon v. Triangle Pacific Corp.
See United States v. Graham, 856 F.2d 756, 759 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 , 109 S.Ct. 1144 , 103 L.Ed.2d 204 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Saccoccia
See United States v. Murphy, 852 F.2d 1, 8 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 , 109 S.Ct. 1145 , 103 L.Ed.2d 205 (1989); see also United States v. Baines, 812 F.2d 41, 42 (1st Cir.1987) (“[A] conspiracy is like a train.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Saccoccia
See United ___ ______ States v. Murphy, 852 F.2d 1, 8 (1st Cir. 1988), cert. denied, ______ ______ _____ ______ 489 U.S. 1022 (1989); see also United States v. Baines, 812 F.2d ___ ____ _____________ ______ 41, 42 (1st Cir. 1987) ("[A] conspiracy is like a train.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernesto Segura-Gallegos
See United States v. Murphy, 852 F.2d 1, 8 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 , 109 S.Ct. 1145 , 103 L.Ed.2d 205 (1989); United States v. Badalamenti, 794 F.2d 821, 826-28 (2d Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. DiFrisco
(2×)
See State v. Zola, 112 N.J. 384, 430 , 548 A. 2d 1022 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 , 109 S.Ct. 1146 , 103 L.Ed. 2d 205 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnny Ray Graham
See United States v. Graham, 856 F.2d 756 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 (1989). 7 Graham argues that the district court relied on inaccurate information at sentencing.
discussed
Cited "see"
O'Murchu v. United States
See United States v. Murphy, 852 ___ _____________ ______ F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 (1989). _____ ______ Thereafter, O'Murchu filed a motion to vacate his conviction and sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255, raising a host of claims.
cited
Cited "see"
O'Murchu v. United States
See United States v. Murphy, 852 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Christine Wocher
See United States v. Graham, 856 F.2d 756, 762 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 (1989); United States v. Bowers, 834 F.2d 607, 610 (6th Cir.1987) (per curiam). 5 Moreover, a court is not permitted to alter a sentence solely to harmonize it with the sentence given to a codefendant.
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. v. Rojas-Martinez
See United States v. Musser, 856 F.2d 1484, 1486-87 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 , 109 S.Ct. 1145 , 103 L.Ed.2d 205 (1989); United States v. Broxton, 926 F.2d 1180, 1183-84 (D.C.Cir.1991) (per curiam). 11 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Johnston
See State v. Zola, 112 N.J. 384, 405-06 , 548 A. 2d 1022 (1988), cert. denied sub nom Zola v. New Jersey, 489 U.S. 1022 , 109 S.Ct. 1146 , 103 L.Ed. 2d 205 (1989); State v. Lewis, 223 N.J.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Deondra D. Gray (91-1242) Frank Johnson (91-1262) Lonnie L. Griffin (91-1265)
See United States v. Musser, 856 F.2d 1484, 1485-86 (11th Cir.1988) (drug dealing called "dirty, nasty, deadly business" not improper), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 (1989); United States v. Wajda, 810 F.2d 754, 763 (8th Cir.) (cocaine called "plague"), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1040 (1987); United States v. Peco, 784 F.2d 798, 810 (7th Cir.) (characterization of defendants as "merchants in death" not condoned but in totality of record not reversible error), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1160 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dixon
(2×)
See State v. Zola, 112 N.J. 384 , 548 A. 2d 1022 (1988) (Handler, J., concurring and dissenting) (proof of sexual penetration was not sufficient to have been submitted to the jury as aggravating factor in capital-murder case), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 , 109 S.Ct. 1146 , 103 L.Ed. 2d 205 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William Gaston
See United States v. Graham, 856 F.2d 756, 763 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 (1989). 5 Accordingly, the district court's judgment is hereby affirmed.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Terrence I. Broxton
See United States v. Musser, 856 F.2d 1484, 1487 (11th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 , 109 S.Ct. 1145 , 103 L.Ed.2d 205 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Moore
(2×)
See State v. Zola, 112 N.J. 384, 446-48 , 548 A. 2d 1022 (1988) (Handler, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 , 109 S.Ct. 1146 , 103 L.Ed. 2d 205 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Anthony Chotas, Cross-Appellee
(2×)
See United States v. Musser, 856 F.2d 1484, 1487 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 , 109 S.Ct. 1145 , 103 L.Ed.2d 205 (1989) (appellants have no constitutional right to the availability of the substantial assistance provision). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tucker
See State v. Powell, 84 N.J. 305 , 316 n. 12, 419 A. 2d 406 (1980), certif. denied, 87 N.J. 332 , 434 A. 2d 81 (1981); see also State v. Zola, 112 N.J. 384, 403 , 548 A. 2d 1022 (1988) (count properly charged jury on aggravated and reckless manslaughter), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 , 109 S.Ct. 1146 , 103 L.Ed. 2d 205 (1989); State v. Rose, 112 N.J. 454, 482 , 548 A. 2d 1058 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kenneth J. Masat
Id.; see also United States v. Molina-Uribe, 853 F.2d 1193, 1201 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 , 109 S.Ct. 1145 , 103 L.Ed.2d 205 (1989) (citation omitted); United States v. Duvall, 846 F.2d 966, 971 (5th Cir.1988) (citations omitted).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cheng Ah-Kai
See also United States v. Musser, 856 F.2d 1484, 1487 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 , 109 S.Ct. 1145 , 103 L.Ed.2d 205 (1989) (the “only authority ‘delegated' ... is the authority to move the district court for a reduction of sentence ... authority to actually reduce a sentence remains vested in the district court”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Larry W. McMahon
See also United States v. Musser, 856 F.2d 1484, 1486 (11th Cir.1988) (“Construing the subsection as a whole, it is clear that a mandatory term of imprisonment is required.”), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 , 109 S.Ct. 1145 , 103 L.Ed.2d 205 (1989); Peters v. United States, 739 F.Supp. 789, 791 (E.D.N.Y.1990) (agreeing with and quoting Musser, supra, at 1486 ); United States v. Brady, 680 F.Supp. 245, 246 (W.D.Ky.1988) (treating as a given that “imprisonment for a period of 5 to 40 years and a fine not to exceed $2,000,000.00 appear in that subsection”) (emphasis added).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sun
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 88-5944.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1989.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.