green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ziegler
See Duncan v. Storie, 869 F.2d 1100, 1102 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 852 , 110 S.Ct. 152 , 107 L.Ed.2d 110 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jack R. Salley, Individually and on Behalf of His Minor Daughter, Danielle Salley, Cross-Appellants. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Cross-Appellees
See, Lowry v. Bankers Life and Casualty Retirement Plan, 871 F.2d 522, 524 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 852 , 110 S.Ct. 152 , 107 L.Ed.2d 111 (1989) (granting the Plan Committee the power to “interpret and construe” the plan was sufficient to apply the abuse of discretion standard); Batchelor v. Int’l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 861 Pension and Retirement Fund, 877 F.2d 441, 443 (5th Cir.1989) (the following language gave the ■administrator discretion: the Trustees “have full and exclusive authority to determine all questions of coverage and eligibili-ty_ They ... h…
discussed
Cited "see"
Salley v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.
See, Lowry v. Bankers Life and Casualty Retirement Plan, 871 F.2d 522, 524 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 852 , 110 S.Ct. 152 , 107 L.Ed.2d 111 (1989) (granting the Plan Committee the power to 1 In accordance with an agreement between the parties, DuPont paid Danielle's hospitalization expenses through November 20, 1990, although DuPont challenges whether the Plan required it to make the payments. "interpret and construe" the plan was sufficient to apply the abuse of discretion standard); Batchelor v. Int'l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 861 Pension and Retirement Fund, 877 F.2d 4…
cited
Cited "see"
Dailey v. Lyles
See Duncan v. Storie, 869 F.2d 1100, 1102 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 852 , 110 S.Ct. 152 , 107 L.Ed.2d 110 (1989). 11 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Villeza
See, e.g., Goldberg v. State, 69 Md.App. 702 , 519 A.2d 779, 788 (1987), aff'd, 315 Md. 653 , 556 A.2d 267 (Md.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 852 , 110 S.Ct. 151 , 107 L.Ed.2d 109 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Morsel JONES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SONAT, INC. MASTER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLAN ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, Defendant-Appellant
Brown v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., 898 F.2d 1556, 1566-67 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1040 , 111 S.Ct. 712 , 112 L.Ed.2d 701 (1991), quoted with approval in Wildbur, 974 F.2d at 638 ; see also Lowry v. Bankers Life & Casualty Retirement Plan, 871 F.2d 522 , 525 n. 6 (5th Cir.) (describing a “sliding scale” judicial review of trustees’ decisions for lack of good faith as being “more penetrating the greater ... the suspicion of partiality, less penetrating the smaller that suspicion”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 852 , 110 S.Ct. 152 , 107 L.Ed.2d 111 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. SONAT, Inc. Master Employee Benefits Plan Administrative Committee
Brown v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., 898 F.2d 1556, 1566-67 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1040 , 111 S.Ct. 712 , 112 L.Ed.2d 701 (1991), quoted with approval in Wildbur, 974 F.2d at 638 ; see also Lowry v. Bankers Life & Casualty Retirement Plan, 871 F.2d 522 , 525 n. 6 (5th Cir.) (describing a "sliding scale" judicial review of trustees' decisions for lack of good faith as being "more penetrating the greater ... the suspicion of partiality, less penetrating the smaller that suspicion"), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 852 , 110 S.Ct. 152 , 107 L.Ed.2d 111 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chunn v. State
Bobo, 757 S.W.2d at 61 (emphasis in original); see also Erlandson v. State, 763 S.W.2d 845, 850 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1988, pet. ref’d), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 852 , 110 S.Ct. 152 , 107 L.Ed.2d 110 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Goldberg
v.
Maryland
v.
Maryland
No. 89-129.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1989.
Published
Ct. App. Md. Cer-tiorari denied.