green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.9 score
“having observed a traffic infraction - the unlighted rear license plate - was justified in stopping defendant's vehicle.”
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Ford
having observed a traffic infraction - the unlighted rear license plate - was justified in stopping defendant's vehicle.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Buitrago Pelaez
See United States v. Zabare, 871 F.2d 282, 290-91 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 856 , 110 S.Ct. 161 , 107 L.Ed.2d 119 (1989) (warrantless search justified by exigent circumstances of preventing destruction of evidence and protecting the undercover operation).
discussed
Cited "see"
Peete v. State
See Walker v. State, 527 N.E.2d 706, 708 (Ind.1988), cert. denied Walker v. Indiana, 493 U.S. 856 , 110 S.Ct. 161 , 107 L.Ed.2d 118 (1989) (holding that investigatory stop of vehicle was justified where license plate illumination and taillight were not functioning).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Clemmons
See Munguia v. U.S. Parole Commission, 871 F.2d 517 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 856 , 110 S.Ct. 161 , 107 L.Ed.2d 119 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Tyrone Thompson v. United States Parole Commission
See Munguia v. United States Parole Comm'n, 871 F.2d 517, 521 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 856 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
LaChance v. Reno
See Munguia v. United States Parole Commission, 871 F.2d 517, 521 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 856 , 110 S.Ct. 161 , 107 L.Ed.2d 119 (1989)). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
James Henry Meador, Jr. v. Joel Knowles
See, Munguia v. United States Parole Comm’n, 871 F.2d 517, 521 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 856 , 110 S.Ct. 161 , 107 L.Ed.2d 119 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hoth
State v. Klauss, [supra, 19 Conn. App. 302 ]; see State v. Guertin, [supra, 190 Conn. 453 ] (adopting objective test for warrantless felony arrest exigency analysis); see also United States v. Zabare, 871 F.2d 282, 291 [(2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 856 , 110 S. Ct. 161 , 107 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Presidential Life Insurance v. Milken
See, e.g., United States v. Zabare, 871 F.2d 282, 287 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 856 , 110 S.Ct. 161 , 107 L.Ed.2d 119 (1989). 26 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
See, e.g., United States v. Zabare, 871 F.2d 282, 288 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 856 , 110 S.Ct. 161 , 107 L.Ed.2d 119 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gilberto Giraldo, Andres Emilio Fermin, and Jose Angel Tellez
Further, a “defendant’s participation in a single transaction can, on an appropriate record, suffice to sustain a charge of knowing participation in an existing conspiracy,” United States v. Miranda-Ortiz, 926 F.2d 172, 176 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 928 , 112 S.Ct. 347 , 116 L.Ed.2d 287 (1991); see also United States v. Zabare, 871 F.2d 282, 287 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 856 , 110 S.Ct. 161 , 107 L.Ed.2d 119 (1989), if the other evidence permits an inference that the defendant had knowledge of the conspiracy and intended to join, see, e.g., United States v. Miranda-Ortiz,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Signorile by and Through Signorile v. City of NY
“The test for determining whether a warrantless entry is justified by exigent circumstances is an objective one that turns on the totality of circumstances confronting law enforcement agents in the particular ease.” United States v. Gordils, 982 F.2d 64, 69 (2d Cir.1992) (quoting United States v. MacDonald, 916 F.2d 766, 769 (2d Cir.1990) (en banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1119 , 111 S.Ct. 1071 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1177 (1991)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1953 , 123 L.Ed.2d 657 (1993); see also United States v. Zabare, 871 F.2d 282, 291 (2d Cir.1989) (quoting United States v. Martinez-Gon…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gant
State v. Klauss, 19 Conn. App. 296, 302 , 562 A.2d 558 (1989); see State v. Guertin, [supra, 190 Conn. 453 ] (adopting objective test for warrantless felony arrest exigency analysis); see also United States v. Zabare, 871 F.2d 282, 291 [(2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 856 , 110 S. Ct. 161 , 107 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Blades
The test is not whether the officers actually believed that an emergency existed, but whether a reasonable officer would have believed that such an emergency existed. . . .” (Citations omitted.) State v. Geisler, supra, 692 ; see also United States v. Zabare, 871 F.2d 282, 291 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 856 , 110 S. Ct. 161 , 107 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Luz Medina, Silverio Polanco, Franklin Marmolejo, Juan A. Mata, Franklin Marmolejo, Silverio Polanco and Juan A. Mata
See United States v. Magnano, 543 F.2d 431, 434-35 (2d Cir.1976) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1101 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977); see also United States v. Zabare, 871 F.2d 282, 286-87 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 856 , 110 S.Ct. 161 , 107 L.Ed.2d 119 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
George
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 89-289.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1989.
493 U.S. 856
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.