green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
Nancy C. Gazaille v. Robert A. McDonald
(4×)
See Office of Personnel Management v. Richmond, 496 U.S. 414, 421, 422 , 110 S.Ct. 2465 , 110 L.Ed.2d 387 (1990) (stating, that, “[d]e-spite the clarity of these earlier decisions [finding no equitable estoppel against the Government], dicta in our more recent cases have suggested the possibility that there might be some situation in which estoppel against the Government could be appropriate,” but noting that “we have reversed every finding of estoppel [against the Government] that we have reviewed”), rehearing denied, 497 U.S. 1046 , 111 S.Ct. 5 , 111 L.Ed.2d 821 (1990); Heckler v. Co…
cited
Cited "see"
Melrose Associates, L.P. v. United States
See Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc., 467 U.S. 51, 59 , 104 S.Ct. 2218 , 81 L.Ed.2d 42 (1984), reh’g denied, 497 U.S. 1046 , 111 S.Ct. 5 , 111 L.Ed.2d 821 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Dallas v. State
See Freeman v. State , 555 So.2d 196 , 208-09 (Ala.Cr.App. 1988), affirmed, 555 So.2d 215 (Ala. 1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1046 , 111 S.Ct. 8 , 111 L.Ed.2d 823 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gemini Electronics, Inc. v. United States
Corp. v. Merrill, 332 U.S. at 384 , 68 S.Ct. 1 ); see also Office of Personnel Mgmt. v. Richmond, 496 U.S. 414, 428 , 110 S.Ct. 2465 , 110 L.Ed.2d 387 (1990) (agencies’ unauthorized statements to citizens cannot obligate the Treasury for the payment of funds), reh’g denied, 497 U.S. 1046 , 111 S.Ct. 5 , 111 L.Ed.2d 821 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Disbarment of Yinger
No. D-921.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Aug 13, 1990.
497 U.S. 1046
Published
It is ordered that David Harrison Yinger, Jr., of Frederick, Md., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.