green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Davila
See State v. Hope, 215 Conn. 570, 584 , 577 A.2d 1000 (1990) (collateral estoppel is protection included in fifth amendment guarantee against double jeopardy), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1089 , 111 S. Ct. 968 , 112 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Hickman v. BWC State Ins. Fund (In re Hickman)
See Diamond Mortgage Corp. of Ill. v. Sugar, 913 F.2d 1233 , 1237 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1089 , 111 S.Ct. 968 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1054 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nancy G. v. Department of Children & Families
It is a matter of black letter, law that “collateral estoppel precludes a party from rehtigating issues and facts actually and necessarily determined in an earlier proceeding between the same parties . . . .” Weiss v. Statewide Grievance Committee, 227 Conn. 802, 818 , 633 A.2d 282 (1993); see State v. Hope, 215 Conn. 570, 584 , 577 A.2d 1000 (1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1089 , 111 S. Ct. 968 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James D. Soderna
(2×)
See United States v. Kozel, 908 F.2d 205, 207 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1089 , 111 S.Ct. 969 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1055 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Volpert v. Volpert (In Re Volpert)
See Diamond Mortgage Corp. of Ill. v. Sugar, 913 F.2d 1233 , 1238 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1089 , 111 S.Ct. 968 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1054 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nash v. Consolidated City of Jacksonville
See Nash v. Consolidated City of Jacksonville, Duval County, Fla., 837 F.2d 1534, 1535 (11th Cir.1988), vacated by, 490 U.S. 1103 , 109 S.Ct. 3151 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1015 (1989), reinstated by, 905 F.2d 355 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1089 , 111 S.Ct. 967 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1054 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Butler
See United States v. Bradley, 905 F.2d 1482, 1488 (11th Cir.1990) (”[T]he trial court is empowered to sever after trial starts under Fed.R.Crim.P. 14 if manifest necessity so requires." (emphasis added)), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1089 , 111 S.Ct. 969 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1055 (1991). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harvey Eugene Butler Justice Vandell Hudson, A/K/A Jet, Eugene Gantt, A/K/A Tap, Anthony Renard Webb, A/K/A Ant, Ricky Jackson, A/K/A Kerry, United States of America v. Lorenzo L. Hooks, A/K/A Peanut
See United States v. Bradley, 905 F.2d 1482, 1488 (11th Cir.1990) ("[T]he trial court is empowered to sever after trial starts under Fed.R.Crim.P. 14 if manifest necessity so requires." (emphasis added)), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1089 , 111 S.Ct. 969 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1055 (1991) 6 The Fourteenth Amendment states, in pertinent part, that "[n]o State shall ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." U.S. Const. amend.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Envirodyne Industries, Inc.
See Diamond Mortgage Corp. of Ill. v. Sugar, 913 F.2d 1233 , 1239 (7th Cir.1990) (stating that a proceeding is core if it invokes a substantive right provided by Title 11 or if it is a proceeding that, by its nature, could only arise in the context of a bankruptcy case), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1089 , 111 S.Ct. 968 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1054 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Manuel Lazaro Chica and Ineldo Leo Ramos
See United States v. Bradley, 905 F.2d 1482, 1489 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1089 , 111 S.Ct. 969 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1055 (1991); United States v. Huang, 960 F.2d 1128, 1136 (2d Cir.1992).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Pettibone Corp.
See Diamond Mortgage Corp. of Ill. v. Sugar, 913 F.2d 1233 , 1239 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1089 , 111 S.Ct. 968 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1054 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chapman v. Burton Berger & Associates (In Re Chapman)
See Diamond Mortgage Corp. of Ill. v. Sugar, 913 F.2d 1233 , 1239 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1089 , 111 S.Ct. 968 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1054 (1991), quoting Barnett v. Stern, 909 F.2d 973, 981 (7th Cir.1990) (“a proceeding is core under section 157 if it invokes a substantive right provided by title 11 or if it is a proceeding that, by its nature, could arise only in the context of a bankruptcy case").
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Monchecourt
See, e.g., United States v. Vidakovich, 911 F.2d 435, 439-40 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1089 (1991); Carr, 80 F.3d at 420 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Adams v. Prudential Securities, Inc. (In Re Foundation for New Era Philanthropy)
See, e.g., Diamond Mortgage Corp. v. Sugar, 913 F.2d 1233 , 1239 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1089 , 111 S.Ct. 968 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1054 (1991); Brock v. Morysville Body Works, Inc., 829 F.2d 383, 385 (3d Cir.1987) (“enforcement of the Commission’s citations against [the debtor] will undoubtedly alter its liabilities and have an impact on the administration of the debtor’s estate”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bank of America National Trust & Savings Assn.
v.
Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco (Walters, Real Party in Interest)
v.
Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco (Walters, Real Party in Interest)
No. 90-1007.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1991.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.