green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.9 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lewis v. Oliver
(2×)
ommunications made in the course of an administrative proceeding are absolutely privileged if the administrative officer or agency is exercising a judicial or quasi-judicial function.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Kaitangian
See Madarang v. Bermudes, 889 F.2d 251 , 253 (9th Cir.1989) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 814 , 111 S.Ct. 54 , 112 L.Ed.2d 29 (1990) (right to pursue a calling is not a fundamental right for purposes of the Equal Protection Clause); In re Adams, 214 B.R. 212, 218 (9th Cir. BAP 1997) (right to pursue calling as petition preparer not a fundamental right).
cited
Cited "see"
Ferm v. U.S. Trustee (In Re Rausch)
See Madarang v. Bermudes, 889 F.2d 251, 253 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 814 , 111 S.Ct. 54 , 112 L.Ed.2d 29 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1997
See Kimbro v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 889 F.2d 869, 878-79 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 814 (1990) (holding that an employer provided employee reasonable accommodation by granting a medical leave of absence during employee's episodes of migraine headaches).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Devery
See United States v. Skelton, 893 F.2d 40, 46 (3d Cir.) (“even assuming bias might in some circumstances be implied, *405 though actual bias is not demonstrated, it must be implied from facts”), cert. denied sub nom., Tozzi v. United States, 498 U.S. 814 , 111 S.Ct. 53 , 112 L.Ed.2d 29 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stiltner v. Beretta USA Corp
See Kimbro v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 889 F.2d 869, 881 (9th Cir. 1989) (looking to case law under Title VII's anti- retaliation provision for guidance in interpreting§ 510's anti- retaliation provision), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 814 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
James E. Stiltner v. Beretta U.S.A. Corporation
(2×)
See Kimbro v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 889 F.2d 869, 881 (9th Cir.1989) (looking to case law under Title VII's anti-retaliation provision for guidance in interpreting Sec. 510's anti-retaliation provision), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 814 , 111 S.Ct. 53 , 112 L.Ed.2d 28 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Donald Jackson v. Veterans Administration, Administrator of Veterans Affairs
(2×)
See Kimbro v. Atlantic-Richfield Co., 889 F.2d 869 (9th Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 814 , 111 S.Ct. 53 , 112 L.Ed.2d 28 (1990), and Teahan v. Metro-North Commuter R.R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sargent v. Litton Systems, Inc.
See Kimbro v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 889 F.2d 869, 878-79 (9th Cir.1989) (leave of absence is reasonable accommodation under analogous Washington state law), cert, denied, 498 U.S. 814 , 111 S.Ct. 53 , 112 L.Edüd 28 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Howell v. STRM LLC - Garden of Eden
Id. at 140 (internal citations omitted); see also Kimbro v. Atlantic 10 Ridgefield Co., 889 F.2d 869 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 814 (1989) (finding there was a 11 significant causal connection between the employee’s disability and termination where the 12 employee was discharged for excessive absenteeism caused by migraine-related absences).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Farness
See also, Madarang v. Bemudes, 889 F.2d 251 , 253 (9th Cir.1989) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 814 , 111 S.Ct. 54 , 112 L.Ed.2d 29 (1990) (right to pursue a calling is not a fundamental right for purposes of the Equal Protection Clause); Jeter v. Office of the United States Trustee (In re Adams), 214 B.R. 212, 218 (9th Cir. BAP 1997) (right to pursue calling as petition preparer not a fundamental right).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Heimann v. National Elevator Industry Pension Fund
(2×)
See, e.g., Kimbro v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 889 F.2d 869, 881 (9th Cir.1989) (employee must prove employer's specific intent to retaliate for employee's exercise of rights under plan), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 814 , 111 S.Ct. 53 , 112 L.Ed.2d 28 (1990); Clark v. Resistoflex Co., Div. of Unidynamics Corp., 854 F.2d at 770 (employee must prove specific intent to interfere with employee's pension rights); Dister v. Continental G'roup, Inc., 859 F.2d 1108, 1111 (2d Cir.1988) (section 510 claimant must prove specific intent to engage in activity prohibited by section 510).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hargens v. United States Department of Agriculture
See also Kimbro v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 889 F.2d 869, 881 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 814 , 111 S.Ct. 53 , 112 L.Ed.2d 28 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rouse v. Farmers State Bank of Jewell, Iowa
See also Kimbro v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 889 F.2d 869, 881 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 814 , 111 S.Ct. 53 , 112 L.Ed.2d 28 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Devoll and Patricia M. Devoll v. Burdick Painting, Inc. And Bay Area Painters and Tapers Health Fund
See, e.g., Kimbro v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 889 F.2d 869, 881 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 814 , 111 S.Ct. 53 , 112 L.Ed.2d 28 (1990); cf. Texas Dep’t of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 , 101 S.Ct. 1089 , 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981) (discussing parties’ burdens of proof under Title VII where there is no direct evidence of a specific intent to discriminate).
Corrigan
v.
New York
v.
New York
No. 89-1804.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Arizona (2)
Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.