green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 6×
17.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2006 · 2 courts ·
…mere possession of a handgun was not sufficient to give rise to a reasonable suspicion that the defendant was illegally carrying that gun
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1996 ·
…the provision for de novo appellate review of summary contempt convictions is a fail-safe mechanism for assuring that the contempt power is not abused.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
COMMONWEALTH v. PIERRE A. SERTYL.
the mere possession of a handgun was not sufficient to give rise to a reasonable suspicion that the defendant was illegally carrying that gun . . .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Campbell
an anonymous tip that someone is carrying a gun does not, without more, constitute reasonable suspicion to conduct a stop and frisk of that individual
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. DePeiza
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
mere possession of a handgun was not sufficient to give rise to a reasonable suspicion that the defendant was illegally carrying that gun
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Doocey
the mere possession of a handgun was not sufficient to give rise to a reasonable suspicion that the defendant was illegally carrying that gun
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Barros
mere possession of a handgun was not sufficient to give rise to a reasonable suspicion that the defendant was illegally carrying that gun
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Brooks v. United States
(2×)
the provision for de novo appellate review of summary contempt convictions is a fail-safe mechanism for assuring that the contempt power is not abused.
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Jeremy E. Winam.
See Commonwealth v. Couture, 407 Mass. 178, 183 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DANIEL F. GONZALEZ, ESQ.(3-2016, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
See In re Daniels, 118 N.J. 51, 66-70 (1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S. Ct. 371 , 112 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Arthur Tyler v. Carl Anderson
See State v. Tyler, 50 Ohio St.3d 24 , 553 N.E.2d 576, 580-82 (1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 334 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Rivas
See Commonwealth v. Couture, 407 Mass. 178, 179, 181 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 (1990) (merely glimpsing weapon, without reasonable basis to believe that holder is carrying it illegally, does not provide probable cause to search or arrest for firearms offense).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Mubdi
See Commonwealth v. Couture, 407 Mass. 178, 180-181 , cert, denied, 498 U.S. 951 (1990).
examined
Cited "see"
Ventura v. State
(4×)
See Ventura v. State, 560 So.2d 217, 217-18 (Fla.1990) (“Ventura I”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 372 , 112 L.Ed.2d 334 (1990); Ventura v. State, 673 So.2d 479, 479-80 (Fla.1996) (“Ventura II”); Ventura v. State, 794 So.2d 553, 558 (Fla.2001) (“Ventura III”), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1098 , 122 S.Ct. 2296 , 152 L.Ed.2d 1054 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. DeJesus
See Commonwealth v. Couture, 407 Mass. 178, 183 , cert, denied, 498 U.S. 951 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Jose Garcia v. State
See Stoker v. State, 788 S.W.2d 1, 13-14 (Tex.Crim.App. 1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Haskell
See Commonwealth v. Couture, 407 Mass. 178, 183 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Landry
See Commonwealth v. Couture, 407 Mass. 178, 180-181 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 (1990) (evidence of handgun possession alone not probable cause; there must be evidence that possession was illegal or handgun was used in crime); Commonwealth v. Toole, 389 Mass. 159, 163 (1983) (same).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Dasilva
See Commonwealth v. Couture, 407 Mass. 178, 183 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 (1990); Commonwealth v. Alvarado, 423 Mass. 266, 268-271, 274 (1996); Commonwealth v. Barros, 435 Mass. at 176-178 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Reyes v. State
See Stoker v. State, 788 S.W.2d 1, 12 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), cer t. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990); see also Moore v. State, 999 S.W.2d 385, 402 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1216 , 120 S.Ct. 2220 , 147 L.Ed.2d 252 (2000) (explaining that the admission of the same evidence from another source without objection forfeits previously stated complaints).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Banks, Unpublished Decision (6-27-2002)
See State v. Tyler (1990), 50 Ohio St.3d 24 , 34-35 , certiorari denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Frederick L. v. Department of Public Welfare
Id.; see Thomas S. v. Flaherty, 699 F.Supp. 1178, 1199 (W.D.N.C.1988) (noting that the “constitutional right of class members to treatment comporting with the judgment of qualified professionals is established” in analyzing the substantive due process rights of mentally retarded adults in public psychiatric institutions under Youngberg), aff'd, 902 F.2d 250 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 373 , 112 L.Ed.2d 335 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Barros
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Couture, 407 Mass. 178, 183 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 (1990); Commonwealth v. Alvarado, 423 Mass. 266, 269 (1996); Commonwealth v. Berment, 39 Mass. App. Ct. 522 (1995); Commonwealth v. Foster, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 671, 673-677 (2000); and, most recently, Florida v. J.L., 120 S. Ct. 1375 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Hall v. State
See Stoker v. State, 788 S.W.2d 1, 10 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), cer t. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Tinlin v. State
See Stoker v. State, 788 S.W.2d 1, 18 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fincher v. State
(2×)
See Stoker v. State, 788 S.W.2d 1, 15 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), cer t. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Withrow v. Bartlett
See Benjamin v. Coughlin, 905 F.2d 571, 574 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 372 , 112 L.Ed.2d 335 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Salahuddin v. Coughlin
(2×)
See Benjamin v. Coughlin, 905 F.2d 571, 574 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 372 , 112 L.Ed.2d 335 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Guerrero v. State
See Stoker v. State, 788 S.W.2d 1, 12 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), cer t. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Wilson ex rel. Hinn v. North Carolina
See Thomas S. v. Flaherty, 902 F.2d 250 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 373 , 112 L.Ed.2d 335 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Norrid v. State
Evid. 404(b); see Stoker v. State, 788 S.W.2d 1, 12-13 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marles v. State
(2×)
See Stoker v. State, 788 S.W.2d 1, 13 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), cert. denied 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990); Gardner v. State, 730 S.W.2d 675, 696 (Tex.Crim.App.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
McFarland v. State
(2×)
See Stoker v. State, 788 S.W.2d 1, 7 (Tex.Cr.App.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Colella v. State
(2×)
See Stoker v. State, 788 S.W.2d 1, 7 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Russell v. State
See Stoker v. State, 788 S.W.2d 1, 14 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990); Hudson v. State, 675 S.W.2d 507, 511 (Tex.Crim.App.1984); Nicholas v. State, 502 S.W.2d 169, 174 (Tex.Crim.App.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Silverman v. Berkson
See In re Daniels, 118 N.J. 51, 60 , 570 A.2d 416 (outlining the difference between criminal contempt and civil contempt in the form of relief to litigants), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990). *429 Because the party subpoenaed is, by definition, not within the jurisdiction, an order of confinement to achieve compliance would not be appropriate.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. United Cook Inlet Drift Ass'n
(2×)
See Benjamin v. Coughlin, 708 F.Supp. 570, 573 (S.D.N.Y.1989), aff'd, 905 F.2d 571 , 576 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 372 , 112 L.Ed.2d 335 (1990). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Banda v. State
(2×)
See Stoker v. State, 788 S.W.2d 1, 7 (Tex.Cr.App.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Messina v. Mazzeo
See Benjamin v. Coughlin, 905 F.2d 571, 575 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 372 , 112 L.Ed.2d 335 (1990): In addition to their first amendment claims, plaintiffs here assert that they have been denied equal protection by reason of treatment different from that afforded to other religious groups.
cited
Cited "see"
Dawson v. State
See Stoker v. State, 788 S.W.2d 1, 11 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. United Cook Inlet Drift Ass'n
See Benjamin v. Coughlin, 708 F.Supp. 570, 573 (S.D.N.Y.1989), affd, 905 F.2d 571, 576 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951, 111 S.Ct. 372 , 112 L.Ed.2d 335 (1990). 14 .Professor Motomura cites three goals that are commonly advanced in support of giving collateral estoppel effect to prior judgments: (1) efficiency, (2) repose, and (3) consistency.
cited
Cited "see"
Barnes v. State
See Stoker v. State, 788 S.W.2d 1, 7 (Tex.Cr.App.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Bell v. State
See Stoker v. State, 788 S.W.2d 1, 17 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), cer t. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
McDuffie v. State
See Stoker v. State, 788 S.W.2d 1, 18 (Tex.Crim.App. 1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. Doe
(2×)
See Thomas S. v. Flaherty, 699 F. Supp. 1178, 1187 (WDNC 1988), aff'd, 902 F. 2d 250 (CA4), cert. denied, 498 U. S. 951 -952 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Salahuddin v. Coughlin, III
See Benjamin v. Coughlin, 905 F.2d 571, 574 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 372 , 112 L.Ed.2d 335 (1990). 13 In O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz, the Supreme Court held that prison regulations alleged to infringe prisoners' free exercise rights are to be judged by a "reasonableness" standard less restrictive than that ordinarily applied to alleged infringements of fundamental constitutional rights. 482 U.S. at 349 , 107 S.Ct. at 2404-05 .
cited
Cited "see"
Salahuddin v. Coughlin
See Benjamin v. Coughlin, 905 F.2d 571, 574 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 372 , 112 L.Ed.2d 335 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Mock v. State
See Stoker v. State, 788 S.W.2d 1, 15 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Canning
See also Commonwealth v. Couture, 407 Mass. 178, 181 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 (1990); Commonwealth v. Stevens, 361 Mass. 868 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zuern v. Tate
See also, State v. Tyler, 50 Ohio St.3d 24, 29 , 553 N.E.2d 576, 585 (mere fact that a defendant waives the right to present mitigating evidence, because he wants to die, does not call his competence into question), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 334 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
WYATT BY AND THROUGH RAWLINS v. Rogers
See, e.g., Thomas S. v. Flaherty, 902 F.2d 250 , 253-54 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 373 , 112 L.Ed.2d 335 (1990). 265 The right asserted by the plaintiffs to be integrated or placed in the least restrictive habilitation appropriate is not, as the defendants would suggest, the equivalent of outright and automatic deinstitutionalization.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rhoades v. State
(2×)
See also Stoker v. State, 788 S.W.2d 1, 16 (Tex.Cr.App.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 951 , 111 S.Ct. 371 , 112 L.Ed.2d 333 (1990) (no error in failing to appoint expert to testify on issue of parole in a capital case).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Richardson
v.
Warden, Wade Correctional Center
v.
Warden, Wade Correctional Center
No. 90-5061.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 1990.
Certiorari, White.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice White and Justice Marshall would grant certiorari.