green
Positive treatment
8.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 45 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Heintz, Nicholas G.
See-Johnson v. State, 803 S. W.2d272, 284 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.zd 1078 (1991)- Rulings on pretrial motions are interlocutory and not subject to immediate appeal.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wenzel Williams v. State of Indiana
See Woods v. State, 547 N.E.2d 772, 781-82 (Ind.1989), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2911 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1991), abrogated on other grounds by Richardson v. State, 717 N.E.2d 32 (Ind.1999). [24] The State responds that the prosecutor’s comments were in response to an implicit request by defense counsel for jury nullification.
cited
Cited "see"
In re: Warren Lee Hill, Jr.
See Haliburton v. State, 561 So.2d 248, 249 (Fla.1990), cert. denied sub nom., Haliburton v. Florida, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2910 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1073 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
in the Interest of A.B. and H.B., Children
Therefore, on the record before us, we cannot say that the trial court abused its discretion by not allowing Father to cross-examine the CPS casework ers on whether they considered the polygraph examination results in making their decision to recommend terminating his parental rights because Father never attempted to question the caseworkers on that issue at trial See id. (holding that appellate court cannot reverse based on a complaint not raised in the trial court); see generally Tennard v. State, 802 S.W.2d 678, 683 (Tex.Crim.App.1990) (holding that the existence and results of polygraph ex…
discussed
Cited "see"
Vega-Colon v. United States
See, Russell v. Lynaugh, 892 F.2d 1205, 1213 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2909 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1073 (1991) (holding that generalized complaints about the quality of an appellate brief do not satisfy the prejudice prong of the Strickland test).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alicea-Torres v. United States
See, Russell v. Lynaugh, 892 F.2d 1205, 1213 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2909 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1073 (1991) (holding that generalized complaints about the quality of an appellate brief do not satisfy the prejudice prong of the Strickland test).
cited
Cited "see"
David Leon Woods v. Daniel R. McBride Superintendent
See Woods v. State, 557 N.E.2d 1325 (Ind.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2911 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Woods, David L. v. McBride, Daniel
See Woods v. State, 557 N.E.2d 1325 (Ind. 1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Ross v. State
See Tennard v. State, 802 S.W.2d 678, 683 (Tex.Cr.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1991). 8 .
cited
Cited "see"
Woods v. Anderson
See Woods v. State, 557 N.E.2d 1325 (Ind.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2911 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jackson v. State
(2×)
See Johnson v. State, 803 S.W.2d 272, 292 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1078 (1991). [13] Appellant concedes that this error alone would not constitute reversible error but contends that the statements challenged in points of error five, six, and sevenwhen considered in combinationdeprived him of a fair trial.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Taylor
See State v. Powell, 798 S.W.2d 709, 716 (Mo. banc 1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Green v. State
See Johnson v. State, 803 S.W.2d 272, 284 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1078 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Karl Hinze Lagrand v. Terry Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, and Dan Vanelli, Warden, Smu Ii, Arizona State Prison, Florence
See LaGrand v. Arizona, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2911 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Easley v. State
See Tennard v. State, 802 S.W.2d 678, 683 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1991); see also United States v. Scheffer, 523 U.S. 303 , 118 S.Ct. 1261 , 140 L.Ed.2d 413 (1998) (federal and state governments may prohibit use of polygraph evidence).
cited
Cited "see"
Tinlin v. State
See Johnson v. State, 803 S.W.2d 272, 291 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cer t. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1078 (1991); Polk v. State, 729 S.W.2d 749, 753 (Tex.Crim.App.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lane v. State
Gates, 462 U.S. at 238 -39 (quoting Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257, 271 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960)); see Johnson v. State, 803 S.W.2d 272, 289 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1078 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Atkins v. Moore
See State v. Atkins, 399 S.E.2d 760 (S.C. 1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Davis v. State
See DeBlanc v. State, 799 S.W.2d 701, 718 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2912 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1075 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harmon v. State
See Johnson v. State, 803 S.W.2d 272, 287 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), overruled on other grounds, Heitman v. State, 815 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.Crim.App.1991), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1078 (1991) and Romero v. State, 800 S.W.2d 539, 543 (Tex.Crim.App.1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Reginald L. Powell v. Michael S. Bowersox
See State v. Powell, 798 S.W.2d 709 (Mo.1990) (en banc), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Reginald L. Powell v. Michael S. Bowersox
See State v. Powell, 798 S.W.2d 709 (Mo. 1990) (en banc), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Flores v. Johnson
See Russell v. Lynaugh, 892 F.2d 1205, 1213 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2909 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1073 (1991) (holding that generalized complaints about the quality of an appellate brief do not satisfy the prejudice prong of the Strickland test); Hamilton v. McCotter, 772 F.2d at 182. 124 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Nelson v. State
See Floyd v. State, 569 So.2d 1225 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2912 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1075 (1991); State v. Fox, 587 So.2d 464 (Fla.1991); Miller v. State, 636 So.2d 144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (if defense counsel fails to object to the reasons given by the prosecutor for excusing a juror, the issue is waived).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hooker v. State
(2×)
See Johnson v. State, 803 S.W.2d 272, 291 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1078 (1991), rev’d on other grounds, 815 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.CrimApp.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alexander v. State
(2×)
See Tennard v. State, 802 S.W.2d 678, 681 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nunez v. State
See Floyd v. State, 569 So.2d 1225, 1229 (Fla. 1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2912 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1075 (1991); State v. Slappy, 522 So.2d 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1219 , 108 S.Ct. 2873 , 101 L.Ed.2d 909 (1988); Fernandez, 639 So.2d at 660 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Holmes
(2×)
See State v. Atkins, 293 S.C. 294 , 360 S.E.2d 302 (1987), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2913 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1076 (1991), overruled on other grounds, State v. Torrence, 305 S.C. 45 , 406 S.E.2d 315 (1991); S.C.Code Ann. § 16-3-20(D) (Supp.1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Scott
See Johnson v. Texas, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1078 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Palmer v. State
See DeBlanc v. State, 799 S.W.2d 701, 706 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2912 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1075 (1991) (lack of argument or authority based upon Texas Constitution waived art.
discussed
Cited "see"
Thompson v. State
See Johnson v. State, 803 S.W.2d 272, 292 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1078 (1991), overruled on other grounds, Heitman v. State, 815 S.W.2d 681, 685 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Goodwin v. State
See Tennard v. State, 802 S.W.2d 678, 681 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alanis v. State
See Tennard v. State, 802 S.W.2d 678, 685 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), *743 cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1991) (finding that prompt instruction cured reference to prior incarceration in penitentiary); Long, 820 S.W.2d at 894 (finding reference to another murder not so extreme that instruction could not cure); Harris, 790 S.W.2d at 588 (finding instruction cured any error about involvement in extraneous robbery).
cited
Cited "see"
Murphy v. State
See Floyd v. State, 569 So.2d 1225, 1231-2 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Torres
Valencia, 820 S.W.2d at 400 ; see also Goodwin v. State, 799 S.W.2d 719, 727 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2913 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1076 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hulit v. State
See, e.g., Johnson v. State, 803 S.W.2d 272, 288 (Tex.Crim.App.1990) (citing Eisenhauer v. State, 754 S.W.2d 159 (Tex.Crim.App.1988), for proposition that Article I, § 9 of the Texas Constitution and the Fourth Amendment of the Federal Constitution are "in all material aspects the same”), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1078 (1991); Gordon v. State, 801 S.W.2d 899, 912 (Tex.Crim.App.1990) (plurality opinion) (citing Eisenhauer v. State & Osban v. State, 726 S.W.2d 107 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), and stating that "... where the federal and state constitutional provisions …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hall v. State
See, e.g., Tennard v. State, 802 S.W.2d 678, 683 (Tex.Crim.App.1990) (en banc), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hernandez v. State
Tex.R.App.P. 74(f); see also DeBlanc v. State, 799 S.W.2d 701, 706 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), ce rt. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2912 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1075 (1990); Hefner v. State, 735 S.W.2d 608, 626-27 (Tex.App.— Dallas 1987, pet. ref'd).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ibarra
See, e.g., Johnson v. State, 803 S.W.2d 272, 286-87 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1078 (1991); Juarez v. State, 758 S.W.2d 772, 775 (Tex.Crim.App.1988); Dickey v. State, 716 S.W.2d 499, 504 (Tex.Crim.App.1986); Meeks v. State, 692 S.W.2d 504, 509 (Tex.Crim.App.1985); Armstrong v. State, 550 S.W.2d 25, 32 (Tex.Crim.App.1976) (op. on reh’g); Kolb v. State, 532 S.W.2d 87, 89 (Tex.Crim.App.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Francis v. State
See Alexander v. State, 866 S.W.2d 1, 8 (Tex.Crim.App.1993), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 1869 , 128 L.Ed.2d 490 (1994); see also Tennard v. State, 802 S.W.2d 678, 682 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), ce rt. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rodriguez v. State
(2×)
Tex.R.App.Proc. 52(a); see also DeBlanc v. State, 799 S.W.2d 701, 718 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2912 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1075 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pittman v. State
See, e.g., Haliburton v. State, 561 So.2d 248 (Fla. 1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2910 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1073 (1991); Hardwick v. State, 521 So.2d 1071 (Fla.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 871 , 109 S.Ct. 185 , 102 L.Ed.2d 154 (1988); Johnston v. State, 497 So.2d 863 (Fla. 1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garcia v. State
See, e.g., Haliburton v. State, 561 So.2d 248, 250 (Fla. 1990) ("We find no abuse of discretion where the trial judge rereads the testimony specifically requested by the jury and that testimony ... is not misleading."), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2910 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1073 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Peterka v. State
Cannady v. State, 620 So.2d 165 (Fla. 1993); see also Floyd v. State, 569 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2912 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1075 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garcia v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Gonzalez, 855 S.W.2d 692, 697 (Tex. Crim.App.1993), Goodwin v. State, 799 S.W.2d 719 , 723 n. 1 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2913 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1076 (1991); Coble v. State, 871 S.W.2d 192, 201-02 (Tex.Crim.App.1993); Tex.R.App.P. 74(f).
Nunez
v.
Costello, Superintendent, Mid-State Correctional Facility
v.
Costello, Superintendent, Mid-State Correctional Facility
No. 90-8225.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 1991.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.