green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
In Re Bernd and Barbara Vockner, Debtors. Bernd and Barbara Vockner v. Kenneth W. Battley, Trustee
See Farmers Co-Op Ass'n of Talmage, Kan. v. Strunk, 671 F.2d 391, 395 (10th Cir.1982); In re Marshall, 198 B.R. 705, 708 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 1996) In re Powers, 112 B.R. 184, 187 (Bankr.S.D.Tex.1989); but see, International Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally's Inc., 939 F.2d 1257, 1265 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1059 (1992); In re Carletta, 189 B.R. 258, 261-62 (Bankr.N.D.N.Y.1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Stanley v. Kirkpatrick
See Todd v. Smith, 305 S.C. 227 , 407 S.E.2d 644 (1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1059 , 112 S.Ct. 938 , 117 L.Ed.2d 109 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Palmer v. Transit Mgmt SE LA
See International Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally’s, Inc., 939 F.2d 1257, 1267 (5th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1059 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Payne v. Collins
See International Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally’s, Inc., 939 F.2d 1257, 1263-65 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1059 , 112 S.Ct. 936 , 117 L.Ed.2d 107 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Diana WARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BECHTEL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
See International Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally’s, Inc., 939 F.2d 1257, 1263 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1059 , 112 S.Ct. 936 , 117 L.Ed.2d 107 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Bray v. Walker
See International Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally's, Inc., 939 F.2d 1257, 1266-67 (5th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1059 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
UP State Federal Credit Union v. Carletta (In Re Carletta)
See International Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally’s Inc., 939 F.2d 1257, 1265 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1059 , 112 S.Ct. 936 , 117 L.Ed.2d 107 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Leigh v. Danek Medical, Inc.
See, e.g., International Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally’s, Inc., 939 F.2d 1257, 1267 (5th Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, 502 U.S. 1059 , 112 S.Ct. 936 , 117 L.Ed.2d 107 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowers v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
Surin v. Virgin Islands Daily News, Inc., 21 F.3d 1309, 1313-14 (3d Cir.1994); compare, e.g., International Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally’s Inc., 939 F.2d 1257, 1267 (5th Cir.1991) (requiring only statement of party’s need for additional discovery), cer t. denied, 502 U.S. 1059 , 112 S.Ct. 936 , 117 L.Ed.2d 107 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mogyrossy v. Comfort Inn
See, e.g., International Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally’s Inc., 939 F.2d 1257, 1267 (5th Cir.1991) (requiring only statement of party's need for additional discovery), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1059 , 112 S.Ct. 936 , 117 L.Ed.2d 107 (1992). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Greenfield v. Schmidt Baking Co., Inc.
See, e.g., Barbe v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc., 722 F.Supp. 1257 (D.Md.1989) (finding that resolution of employer’s privilege defense would require interpretation of the CBA to determine the relative interests in the communication of the union, the employer and the employee where the communication was published only to the employee, two supervisors and the local union), af f'd mem., 940 F.2d 651 (4th Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, 502 U.S. 1059 , 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 109 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hudson Ex Rel. Hudson v. Bloomfield Hills Public Schools
See also, Fischer v. Rochester Community Schools, 780 F.Supp. 1142, 1150 (E.D.Mich.1991), in which the court noted the lack of merit in the plaintiff-parents argument that their handicapped child was entitled to all appropriate services at the “home school” explaining, “[W]e are taught by Barnett v. Fairfax County School Board, supra, that ... there is no such entitlement.” Similarly, in Schuldt v. Mankato School District No. 77, 937 F.2d 1357 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1059 , 112 S.Ct. 937 , 117 L.Ed.2d 108 (1992), the Eighth Circuit stated: The [plaintiffs] argue that the…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Duncan McCoy Alex Dorsett, and Alex-Duncan Shrimp Chef, Inc. v. Mitsuboshi Cutlery, Inc., and Admiral Craft Equipment Corporation
Victoria Bank & Trust Co. v. Brady, 811 S.W.2d 931, 939-40 (Tex.1991); see also International Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally’s, Inc., 939 F.2d 1257, 1270-71 (5th Cir.1991) (following Victoria Bank & Trust), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1059 , 112 S.Ct. 936 , 117 L.Ed.2d 107 (1992).
Rally's, Inc.
v.
International Shortstop, Inc.
v.
International Shortstop, Inc.
No. 91-824.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 1992.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.