green
Positive treatment
8.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Mogan v. Sacks, Ricketts & Case LLP
Mogan, 2022 WL 94927 , at *5-9; see Buster, 104 F.3d at 1190 (Rule 25 11 sanctions proper where claims barred by issue preclusion) (citing In re Grantham Brothers, 922 26 F.2d 1438 , 1442 (9th Cir. 1991) (collateral attack with no basis in law or fact is frivolous under 27 Rule 11), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 826 (1991)); Maciosek v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of 1 when parties assert the same or similar claims in lawsuits raising claims previously decided in 2 other cases); Welk v. GMAC Mortg., LLC, 720 F3d 736, 738-39 (8th Cir. 2013) (same); Roberts v. 3 Chevron, 117 F.R.D. 581 (M.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dye v. Communications Ventures III, LP (In re Flashcom, Inc.)
See In re DeVille, 361 F.3d 539, 547 (9th Cir.2004) (discussing review of a bankruptcy court’s sanctions award, noting that “[t]his court reviews an award of sanctions for an abuse of discretion”); Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., 496 U.S. 384, 405 , 110 S.Ct. 2447, 2461 , 110 L.Ed.2d 359 (1990) (“An appellate court should apply an abuse-of-discretion standard in reviewing all aspects of a district court’s Rule 11 determination.”), superseded by statute, in part, on other grounds. “[PJrecedents interpreting [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure] 11 may prove a helpful guide to our int…
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph v. Linehaul Logistics, Inc.
See In re Grantham Brothers, 922 F.2d 1438 , 1442 (9th Cir.1991) (collateral attack with no basis in law or fact is frivolous under Rule 11), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 826 , 112 S.Ct. 94 , 116 L.Ed.2d 66 (1991); Roberts v. Chevron, 117 F.R.D. 581 (M.D.La.1987) (bringing state court action attacking prior federal judgment and failing to dismiss after removal justified Rule 11 sanctions; reasonable inquiry would have shown that res judicata barred action), aff 'd, 857 F.2d 1471 (5th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rosario-Dominguez v. United States
See United States v. Vargas, 920 F.2d 167, 170 (2d Cir.1990) (ineffective assistance claim based on counsel’s failure to call defense witnesses rejected where proffered testimony related only to “collateral matters”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 826 , 112 S.Ct. 93 , 116 L.Ed.2d 64 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Waller v. Kriss (In Re Kriss)
See Valley National Bank v. Needler (In re Grantham Bros.), 922 F.2d 1438, 1441 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 826 , 112 S.Ct. 94 , 116 L.Ed.2d 66 (1991); Townsend v. Holman Consulting Corp., 929 F.2d 1358, 1362 (9th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jack B. Buster, A. Lee Petersen v. Ronald E. Greisen Henry P. Head and David L. Ratchye
See In re Grantham Brothers, 922 F.2d 1438 , 1442 (9th Cir.1991) (collateral attack with no basis in law or fact is frivolous under Rule 11), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 826 , 112 S.Ct. 94 , 116 L.Ed.2d 66 (1991); Roberts v. Chevron, 117 F.R.D. 581 (M.D.La.1987) (bringing state court action attacking prior federal judgment and failing to dismiss after removal justified Rule 11 sanctions; reasonable inquiry would have shown that res judicata barred action), aff'd, 857 F.2d 1471 (5th Cir.1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Horacio Davila Moreno A/K/A Joe John Peretta A/K/A \Johnny Goo\"
See United States v. Vargas, 920 F.2d 167, 170 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 826 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William E. Green, Harold P. Jackman, Joseph Stancil, James R. Green
See United States v. Vargas, 920 F.2d 167, 169-70 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 826 , 112 S.Ct. 93 (1991). 18 The sole basis for Green's ineffective assistance of counsel claim not addressed by the trial judge is Green's argument that trial counsel's allegations of prosecutorial racial bias undermined the outcome of trial.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Huisman
United States v. Agofsky, 20 F.3d 866, 873 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 280 , 130 L.Ed.2d 196 , cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 363 , 130 L.Ed.2d 316 (1994); see United States v. Kordosky, 921 F.2d 722, 723-24 (7th Cir.) (preexisting, unwritten policy requiring inventory search on every ear seized for forfeiture is sufficient), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 826 , 112 S.Ct. 94 , 116 L.Ed.2d 66 (1991); United States v. Frank, 864 F.2d 992, 1003 (3d Cir.1988) (finding sufficient a preexisting, unwritten policy for inventory on vehicles seized for forfeiture), cert. denied, 490 U.S…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James
See generally Thomas v. Cheney, 925 F.2d 1407 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 826 , 112 S.Ct. 93 , 116 L.Ed.2d 65 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Anthony J. Leone, Debtor. Richard A. Canatella v. Carr, McClellan Ingersoll, Thompson & Horn
See In re Grantham Brothers, 922 F.2d 1438 , 1441 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 826 (1991)
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. Conway
See, e.g., United States v. Vargas, 920 F.2d 167, 170 (2d Cir.1990) (petitioner’s affidavit making allegations in “conclusory fashion” failed to demonstrate that counsel’s decision not to call witness was unreasonable), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 826 , 112 S.Ct. 93 , 116 L.Ed.2d 64 (1991); Rosario v. Bennett, No. 01 Civ. 7142, 2002 WL 31852827 at *9, 31-33 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Black v. Goord
See, e.g., United States v. Vargas, 920 F.2d 167, 170 (2d Cir.1990) (stating that petitioner’s affidavit making allegations in a “conclusory fashion” failed to demonstrate that counsel’s decision not to call a witness was unreasonable), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 826 , 112 S.Ct. 93 , 116 L.Ed.2d 64 (1991); Muhammad v. Bennett, 96 Civ. 8430, 1998 WL 214884 at *1 (S.D.N.Y.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Juan H. Lomeli
Wells, 495 U.S. at 4 , 110 S.Ct. at 1635 ; see also United States v. Kordosky, 921 F.2d 722, 724 (7th Cir.1991), certiorari denied, 502 U.S. 826 , 112 S.Ct. 94 , 116 L.Ed.2d 66 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Geisler
v.
Ohio
v.
Ohio
No. 90-7654.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
Published
Ct. App. Ohio, Hamilton County. Certiorari denied.