green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Wessmann v. Boston School Committee
Accord, Stuart v. Roache, 951 F.2d 446, 450 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 913 , 112 S.Ct. 1948 , 118 L.Ed.2d 553 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
McLAUGHLIN BY McLAUGHLIN v. Boston School Committee
See Stuart v. Roache, 951 F.2d 446 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 913 , 112 S.Ct. 1948 , 118 L.Ed.2d 553 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Alexander v. Prince George's County, Md.
See Stuart v. Roache, 951 F.2d 446, 455 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 913 , 112 S.Ct. 1948 , 118 L.Ed.2d 553 (1992). 3 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Dallas v. Dallas Fire Fighters Ass'n
See McNamara v. Chicago, 138 F. 3d 1219, 1223-1224 (CA7), cert. denied, 525 U. S. 981 (1998); see also Stuart v. Roche, 951 F. 2d 446, 450-452 (CA1 1991), cert. denied, 504 U. S. 913 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Dallas v. Dallas Fire Fighters Ass'n
See McNamara v. Chicago, 138 F. 3d 1219, 1223-1224 (CA7), cert. denied, 525 U. S. 981 (1998); see also Stuart v. Roche, 951 F. 2d 446, 450-452 (CA1 1991), cert. denied, 504 U. S. 913 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eldredge v. Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Joint Apprenticeship & Training Committee
See, e.g., Stuart v. Roache, 951 F.2d 446 (1st Cir.1991) (Breyer, J.), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 913 , 112 S.Ct. 1948 , 118 L.Ed.2d 553 (1992); Newark Branch, NAACP v. Town of Harrison, 940 F.2d 792 (3rd Cir.1991); F.I.R.E., 588 F.2d 235 (8th Cir.); Higgins v. City of Vallejo, 823 F.2d 351 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1051 , 109 S.Ct. 1310 , 103 L.Ed.2d 579 (1989); Howard v. McLucas, 871 F.2d 1000 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 560 , 107 L.Ed.2d 555 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eldridge v. Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Joint Apprenticeship And Training Committee
See, e.g., Stuart v. Roache, 951 F.2d 446 (1st Cir.1991) (Breyer, J.), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 913 , 112 S.Ct. 1948 , 118 L.Ed.2d 553 (1992); Newark Branch, NAACP v. Town of Harrison, 940 F.2d 792 (3rd Cir.1991); F.I.R.E., 588 F.2d 235 (8th Cir.); Higgins v. City of Vallejo, 823 F.2d 351 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1051 , 109 S.Ct. 1310 , 103 L.Ed.2d 579 (1989); Howard v. McLucas, 871 F.2d 1000 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1002 , 110 S.Ct. 560 , 107 L.Ed.2d 555 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wirth v. United States
(2×)
Indeed, this court is bound to give effect to “the clear meaning of a statute, as revealed by its language, purpose, and history.” Al Tech Specialty Steel Corp. v. United States, 745 F.2d 632, 642 (Fed.Cir. 1984) (quoting Southern [sic] Comm’y College v. Davis, 442 U.S. 397, 411 , 99 S.Ct. 2361, 2369 , 60 L.Ed.2d 980 (1979)) (emphasis added); see also Farrel Corp. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm., 949 F.2d 1147, 1152 (Fed.Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 913 , 112 S.Ct. 1947 , 118 L.Ed.2d 551 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Legal Guidance on the Implications of the Supreme Court's Decision in Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña
See, e.g., Stuart v. Roache, 951 F.2d 446, 449 (1st Cir. 1991) (Breyer, J.) cert, denied, 504 U.S. 913 (1992). ,0Title VII o f the 1964 Civil Rights Act is the principal federal employment discrimination statute.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hairston v. Pacific-10 Conference
(2×)
The Court emphasized that denying standing to the more remote party in that case was “not likely to leave a significant antitrust violation undetected or unremedied.” AGC, 459 U.S. at 542 , 103 S.Ct. at 911 ; see also Yellow Pages Cost Consultants, Inc. v. GTE Directories Corp., 951 F.2d 1158, 1163-64 (9th Cir.1991) (noting that the purpose of the “more appropriate plaintiff’ analysis is to ensure that antitrust violations will be identified and remedied), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 913 , 112 S.Ct. 1947 , 118 L.Ed.2d 552 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pomini Farrel S. p. A.
v.
Farrel Corp.
v.
Farrel Corp.
No. 91-1501.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 18, 1992.
Published
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.