green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
3570 East Foothill Blvd., Inc. v. City of Pasadena
a law cannot condition the free exercise of first amendment rights on the 'unbridled discretion' of government officials.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bery v. City of New York
See Gaudiya Vaishnava Soc’y v. City of San Francisco, 952 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 914 , 112 S.Ct. 1951 , 118 L.Ed.2d 555 (1992); One World One Family Now v. City of Key West, 852 F.Supp. 1005, 1008 (S.D.Fla.1994) (granting preliminary injunction on ground that plaintiffs demonstrated substantial likelihood that “the sale of message-bearing T-shirts will be found to be fully protected First Amendment activity”); People v. Krebs, 54 Misc.2d 578 , 282 N.Y.S.2d 996 (N.Y.City Crim.Ct.1967).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eric McLean
United States v. Harris, 39 F.3d 1262, 1267 (4th Cir.1994); see United States v. Mabry, 953 F.2d 127, 130 (4th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 914 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. American Society of Composers, Authors & Publishers
See United States v. ASCAP/Application of Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., 782 F.Supp. 778, 790, 813 (S.D.N.Y.1991) (Dolinger, Mag.J.), aff'd, 956 F.2d 21 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 914 , 112 S.Ct. 1950 , 118 L.Ed.2d 554 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Berkeley Community Health Project v. City of Berkeley
See Gaudiya Vaishnava Society v. City and County of San Francisco, 952 F.2d 1059, 1064 (9th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied by City and County of San Francisco v. Gaudiya Vaishnava Society, 504 U.S. 914 , 112 S.Ct. 1951 , 118 L.Ed.2d 555 (1992) (where pure speech and commercial speech inextricably intertwined, the entire speech must be classified as fully protected noncommercial speech).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wihbey v. Zoning Board of Appeals (Dissent)
See, e.g., Ewing v. Carmel-By- The-Sea, 234 Cal. App. 3d 1579, 1591 , 286 Cal. Rptr. 382 (1991) (finding that short-term rentals of homes in 0, 0 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 11 0 Conn. 0 ,0 13 Wihbey v. Zoning Board of Appeals single-family residential zoning districts ‘‘undoubtedly affect the essential character of a neighborhood and the stability of a community’’), review denied, California Supreme Court, Docket No. S023822 (January 8, 1992), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 914 , 112 S. Ct. 1950 , 118 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wihbey v. Zoning Board of Appeals (Dissent)
See, e.g., Ewing v. Carmel-By- The-Sea, 234 Cal. App. 3d 1579, 1591 , 286 Cal. Rptr. 382 (1991) (finding that short-term rentals of homes in 0, 0 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 11 0 Conn. 0 ,0 13 Wihbey v. Zoning Board of Appeals single-family residential zoning districts ‘‘undoubtedly affect the essential character of a neighborhood and the stability of a community’’), review denied, California Supreme Court, Docket No. S023822 (January 8, 1992), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 914 , 112 S. Ct. 1950 , 118 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ewing
v.
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
v.
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
No. 91-1541.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 18, 1992.
504 U.S. 914
Published
Citer courts: C.D. California (1)
Ct. App. Cal., 6th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.