green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Shuford v. Alabama State Board of Education
See Henderson v. Graddick, 641 F.Supp. 1192, 1200 (M.D.Ala.1986) (per curiam) (three-judge court) ("laches is not a defense to a Section 5 claim”); Dotson v. City of Indianola, 514 F.Supp. 397 (N.D.Miss.1981) (three-judge court) ("laches is not available for a private action for injunctive relief brought under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act"), aff'd 456 U.S. 1002 , 102 S.Ct. 2287 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1296 (1982); but see Lopez v. Hale County, 797 F.Supp. 547, 549-550 (N.D.Tex.1992) (three-judge court) (laches is a factor given substantial weight in determining an equitable remedy in a § 5 case)…
discussed
Cited "see"
Pabst Brewing Company, Inc. v. Jack S. Corrao
(2×)
See generally Henson v. East Lincoln Township, 814 F.2d 410 (7th Cir.1987), cert. dism'd, 506 U.S. 1042 , 113 S.Ct. 1035 , 122 L.Ed.2d 111 (1993); Channell v. Citicorp National Servs., Inc., 89 F.3d 379 , 387 (7th Cir.1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dow Corning Corp.
v.
Tigg Corp.
v.
Tigg Corp.
No. 92-323.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 31, 1992.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.