green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Stoffels Ex Rel. SBC Telephone Concession Plan v. SBC Communications, Inc.
See Carrabba v. Randalls Food Markets, Inc., 38 F.Supp.2d 468 (ND.Tex.1999), aff'd per curiam, 252 F.3d 721 (5th Cir.2001), MDPhysicians & Assoc. v. State Bd. of Ins., 957 F.2d 178 , 183 n. 7 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 861 , 113 S.Ct. 179 , 121 L.Ed.2d 125 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Levine v. Recant
The summary contempt adjudication was justified by petitioner’s clear disrespect for respondent in open court and in her immediate view and presence (Judiciary Law § 750 [A] [1]; § 751 [1]; § 755; 22 NYCRR 604.2 [a] [1]; see, Matter ofBrostoff v Berkman, 79 NY2d 938 [affg 170 AD2d 364 ], cert denied 506 US 861 ; Matter of Kunstler v Galligan, 168 AJ)2d 146, affd 79 NY2d 775 ).
cited
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Busch
See In re Apex Oil Co., 958 F.2d 243, 245 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 861 , 113 S.Ct. 180 , 121 L.Ed.2d 125 (1992); Morgan v. Commercial Union Assur.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fuller Ex Rel. International Ass'n of Entrepreneurs of America Benefit Trust v. Ulland
See MDPhysicians & Assoc., Inc. v. State Bd. of Ins., 957 F.2d 178, 182 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 861 , 113 S.Ct. 179 , 121 L.Ed.2d 125 (1992); ELCO Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Builders Supply Assoc. of West Virginia, 832 F.Supp. 1054 (S.D.W.Va.1993); Plog v. Colorado Ass’n of Soil Conservation Dists., 841 F.Supp. 350 (D.Colo.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fuller v. Ulland
See MDPhysicians & Assoc., Inc. v. State Bd. of Ins., 957 F.2d 178, 182 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 861 , 113 S.Ct. 179 , 121 L.Ed.2d 125 (1992); ELCO Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Builders Supply Assoc. of West Virginia, 832 F.Supp. 1054 (S.D.W.Va.1993); Plog v. Colorado Ass'n of Soil Conservation Dists., 841 F.Supp. 350 (D.Colo.1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bickwid v. Deutsch
An order of the court must be obeyed even if erroneously made, so long as the court had jurisdiction, and the order was not void on its face (see, Wolstencroft v Sassower, 212 AD2d 598 ; Busters Cleaning Corp. v Frati, 203 AD2d 409 ; see also, Matter of Brostoff v Berkman, 79 NY2d 938 , cert denied 506 US 861 ; Matter of Balter v Regan, 63 NY2d 630 , cert denied 469 US 934 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Sarrio S.A.
Esmerian, Inc., 51 F.3d 1095, 1098 (2d Cir.1995) (reaffirming that “the discover-ability of requested material under foreign law is simply one factor that a district judge may consider in the exercise [of] his or her discretion”); see also Malev Hungarian Airlines v. United Technologies International, Inc., 964 F.2d 97 (2nd Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 861 , 113 S.Ct. 179 , 121 L.Ed.2d 125 (1992) (holding that a foreign litigant need not seek discovery from foreign court before proceeding under section 1782).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mackensworth
v.
Sea-Land Service, Inc.
v.
Sea-Land Service, Inc.
No. 92-5.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1992.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.