green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
10.1 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[F]ailure to object to discovery 9 requests within the time required constitutes a waiver of any objection.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[F]ailure to object to discovery requests within the time required constitutes a waiver of any objection.”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
(PC) Juniel v. Clausen
ailure to object to discovery 9 requests within the time required constitutes a waiver of any objection.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ramirez v. County of Los Angeles
ailure to object to discovery requests within the time required constitutes a waiver of any objection.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Arizona Minority Coalition for Fair Redistricting v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
the requirement that a minority group be large enough to control a district, not just 'influence' it, enables the courts to adjudicate voting rights act claims with a reasonable amount of efficiency and consistency.
discussed
Cited "see"
Oblander v. Hamilton
Ritter, 992 F.2d at 753 ; Fariello, 860 F.Supp. at 65 ; see Illinois Legislative Redistricting Commission v. LaPaille, 786 F.Supp. 704 , 710 (N.D.Ill.) (the exception to Rooker-Feldman is habeas corpus cases), aff'd, 506 U.S. 948 , 113 S.Ct. 399 , 121 L.Ed.2d 325 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Snodderly v. Kansas
Ritter, 992 F.2d at 753 ; Fariello, 860 F.Supp. at 65 ; see Illinois Legislative Redistricting Commission v. LaPaille, 786 F.Supp. 704 , 710 (N.D.Ill.) (the exception to Rooker-Feldman is habeas corpus cases), aff'd, 506 U.S. 948 , 113 S.Ct. 399 , 121 L.Ed.2d 325 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alvarez v. City of Westmorland
See McGonigle v. Combs, 968 F.2d 810, 818-19 (9th Cir.) (upholding trial court's decision to disallow plaintiffs from admitting evidence on claim not specified in their pretrial list two weeks into trial), cert. dismissed sub nom., 506 U.S. 948 , 113 S.Ct. 399 , 121 L.Ed.2d 325 (1992). 34 Finally, the Alvarezes claim that the district court's denial of the Alvarezes' motion to amend the pretrial order was a miscarriage of justice.
cited
Cited "see"
Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse
See McGonigle v. Combs, 968 F.2d 810, 821 (9th Cir.1992), cert. dismissed sub nom., Casares v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 506 U.S. 948 , 113 S.Ct. 399 , 121 L.Ed.2d 325 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Blue Sky L. Rep. P 74,088, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,315, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,563 Paracor Finance, Inc., (Fka Elders Finance, Inc.), a New York Corporation Cargill Financial Services Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Lutheran Brotherhood, a Minnesota Corporation Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company, an Iowa Corporation v. General Electric Capital Corporation, a New York Corporation Jordan D. Schnitzer Burton A. Burton Jerry C. Holland
See McGonigle v. Combs, 968 F.2d 810, 817 (9th Cir.), cert. dismissed, Casares v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 506 U.S. 948 , 113 S.Ct. 399 , 121 L.Ed.2d 325 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Prime Ticket Network v. British-American Communications, Inc.
See Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling Consultants, 959 F.2d 1468, 1482 (9th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 506 U.S. 948 , 113 S.Ct. 454 , 121 L.Ed.2d 325 (1992); Perry v. O'Donnell, 759 F.2d 702 , 706 (9th Cir.1985). 3.
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,218, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3050, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5110, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7454 Julius Gray Leroy William Rodewald v. First Winthrop Corp. Winthrop Financial Co., Inc. Winthrop Securities Co., Inc. 353 San Francisco Associates
See McGonigle v. Combs, 968 F.2d 810, 817 (9th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 506 U.S. 948 , 113 S.Ct. 399 , 121 L.Ed.2d 325 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Gray v. First Winthrop Corp.
See McGonigle v. Combs, 968 F.2d 810, 817 (9th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 506 U.S. 948 , 113 S.Ct. 399 , 121 L.Ed.2d 325 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Paracor Finance, Inc. v. General Electric Capital Corp.
See McGonigle v. Combs, 968 F.2d 810, 817 (9th Cir.), cert. dismissed, Casares v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 506 U.S. 948 , 113 S.Ct. 399 , 121 L.Ed.2d 325 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Paracor Finance, Inc. v. General Electric Capital Corporation
See McGonigle v. Combs, 968 F.2d 810, 817 (9th Cir.), cert. dismissed, Casares v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 506 U.S. 948 , 113 S.Ct. 399 , 121 L.Ed.2d 325 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Paracor Finance, Inc. v. General Electric Capital Corp.
See McGonigle v. Combs, 968 F.2d 810, 817 (9th Cir.), cert. dismissed, Casares v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 506 U.S. 948 , 113 S.Ct. 399 , 121 L.Ed.2d 325 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lilley v. Charren
See Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Vigman, 908 F.2d 1461, 1468 (9th Cir.1990), rev’d on other grounds, 503 U.S. 258 , 112 S.Ct. 1311 , 117 L.Ed.2d 532 (1992) (“What securities lawyers call ‘loss causation’ is the standard common law fraud rule of ‘proximate causation.’ ”) Loss causation in a Rule 10b-5 claim requires that “the misrepresentation touch[] upon the reasons for the investment’s decline in value.” McGonigle v. Combs, 968 F.2d 810, 821 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 948 , 113 S.Ct. 399 , 121 L.Ed.2d 325 (1992) (quoting Huddleston v. Herman & MacLe…
discussed
Cited "see"
Mounkes v. Conklin
Ritter, 992 F.2d at 753 ; Fariello, 860 F.Supp. at 65 ; see Illinois Legislative Redistricting Commission v. LaPaille, 786 F.Supp. 704 , 710 (N.D.Ill.) (the exception to Rooker-Feldman is habeas corpus cases), aff'd, 506 U.S. 948 , 113 S.Ct. 399 , 121 L.Ed.2d 325 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alcalde v. Nac Real Estate Investments & Assignments, Inc.
Fed.R.Civ.P. 34(b)(2); C.C.P. § 2031.300(a); see also Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling Consultants, 959 F.2d 1468,1473 (9th Cir.) (“It is well established that a failure to object to discovery requests within the time required constitutes a waiver of any objection.”), cert. dismissed, 506 U.S. 948 , 113 S.Ct. 454 , 121 L.Ed.2d 325 (1992). 2.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Rawstrom
See, e.g., Davis v. Fendler, 650 F.2d 1154, 1160 (9th Cir.1981) (holding that untimely service of response to interrogatories waives objections); see also Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling Consultants, 959 F.2d 1468, 1473 (9th Cir.) (stating that “[flailure to object to [documents] requests within the time required constitutes a waiver of any objection.”), cer t. denied, 506 U.S. 948 , 113 S.Ct. 454 , 121 L.Ed.2d 325 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gardner
v.
Dixon, Warden
v.
Dixon, Warden
No. 92-6260 (A-318).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 22, 1992.
506 U.S. 948
Application, Blackmun, Grant, Stay.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.
Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens would grant the application for stay.