green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Haas
Acknowledging that "[a] presumption of validity attaches to a judicially approved search warrant" ( People v Brewer , 155 AD3d 1447, 1449 [3d Dept 2017]; see People v Castillo , 80 NY2d 578, 585 [1992], cert denied 507 US 1033 [1993]; People v Oliver , 172 AD3d 1457 , 1458 [3d Dept 2019], lv denied 34 NY3d 1080 [2019]), we are satisfied that these warrant applications sufficiently established reasonable cause to believe that evidence of sex crimes, including electronic evidence, could be found in defendant's apartment ( see People v Alexander , 207 AD3d 878, 880 [3d Dept 2022]; People v Miller…
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Vanness
“A search warrant that has been approved by a reviewing magistrate is cloaked with a presumption of validity” (People v Rogers, 94 AD3d 1246, 1247 [2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 977 [2012] [citation omitted]; see People v Castillo, 80 NY2d 578, 585 [1992], cert denied 507 US 1033 [1993]). “[T]o establish probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant, the warrant application must demonstrate that there is ‘sufficient information to support a reasonable belief that evidence of a crime may be found in a certain place’ ” (People v Pinkney, 90 AD3d 1313, 1315 [2011], quoting People v C…
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Vanness
“A search warrant that has been approved by a reviewing magistrate is cloaked with a presumption of validity” (People v Rogers, 94 AD3d 1246, 1247 [2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 977 [2012] [citation omitted]; see People v Castillo, 80 NY2d 578, 585 [1992], cert denied 507 US 1033 [1993]). “[T]o establish probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant, the warrant application must demonstrate that there is ‘sufficient information to support a reasonable belief that evidence of a crime may be found in a certain place’ ” (People v Pinkney, 90 AD3d 1313, 1315 [2011], quoting People v C…
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Mercer
Defendant contends that, because County Court refused to provide him with an unredacted copy of the search warrant application, the court was required to conduct a Darden hearing (People v Darden, 34 NY2d 177 [1974], rearg denied 34 NY2d 995 [1974]; see generally People v Castillo, 80 NY2d 578, 582-584 [1992], cert denied 507 US 1033 [1993]).
cited
Cited "see"
Walker v. University of Colo
See United States v. Burger, 964 F.2d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1033 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
David v. City And County Of Denver
See United States v. Burger, 964 F.2d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1033 , 113 S.Ct. 1854 , 123 L.Ed.2d 477 (1993). 18 Officer David argues that because of his contact with the Denver Police Department, including his representation of Chief Michaud over twenty years ago, the trial judge should have granted the § 455(a) motion for disqualification.
cited
Cited "see"
David v. City & County of Denver
See United States v. Burger, 964 F.2d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1033 , 113 S.Ct. 1854 , 123 L.Ed.2d 477 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry B. Kraig, Cross-Appellee
See,, e.g., United States v. Dean, 969 F.2d 187, 197 (6th Cir. *1370 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1033 , 113 S.Ct. 1852 , 123 L.Ed.2d 475 (1993) (guidelines require five participants, not five subordinates to defendant).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bruce A. Davenport v. Merit Systems Protection Board
See Caney v. Department of the Treasury, 48 M.S.P.R. 101 , 103 (1991) (no due diligence because of six-month filing delay after learning of new evidence), aff'd, 956 F.2d 1172 (Fed.Cir.1992) (Table), cert.denied, 507 U.S. 1033 (1993); Jenkins-Nye v. General Servs.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Lowe
To do otherwise hardly seems consistent with our duty to “recogni[ze] . . . the special need for protection of the interests of the absent defendant” (Darden, 34 NY2d at 181 ; see also People v Castillo, 80 NY2d 578, 585-586 [1992] [“when a court resolves (the probable cause) question without the defendant’s participation it must be particularly diligent and consider all possible challenges that might be raised on the defendant’s behalf’], cert denied 507 US 1033 [1993]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Roxby
In reviewing the affidavit and interviewing the informant in camera, County Court satisfied the review procedures articulated in balancing the competing needs of defendant and the confidential informant (see, People v Darden, 34 NY2d 177 ; see also, People v Castillo, 80 NY2d 578 , cert denied 507 US 1033 ; People v Liberatore, 79 NY2d 208 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Peterson
v.
Stafford, Washington County, Minnesota, Auditor
v.
Stafford, Washington County, Minnesota, Auditor
No. 92-1488.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 19, 1993.
Published
Sup. Ct. Minn. Certiorari denied.