green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Olson v. United States
See United States v. Olson, 978 F.Zd 1472 (7th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 997 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Perron
(2×)
See United States v. Ingram, 979 F.2d 1179, 1184 (7th Cir.1992), cert, denied, 507 U.S. 997 ..., 113 S.Ct. 1616 , 123 L.Ed.2d 176 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Acevedo
(2×)
See United States v. Ingram, 979 F.2d 1179, 1184 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 997 , 113 S.Ct. 1616 , 123 L.Ed.2d 176 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Rybar, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Hale, 978 F.2d 1016, 1020 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 997 , 113 S.Ct. 1614 , 123 L.Ed.2d 174 (1993); United States v. Oakes, 564 F.2d 384, 387 (10th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 926 , 98 S.Ct. 1493 , 55 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978); United States v. Warin, 530 F.2d 103, 106 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 948 , 96 S.Ct. 3168 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1185 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brad Eugene Branch, Kevin Whitecliff, Jaime Castillo, Renos Lenny Avraam, Paul Fatta and Graeme Leonard Craddock
(2×)
See United States v. Hale, 978 F.2d 1016 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 997 , 113 S.Ct. 1614 , 123 L.Ed.2d 174 (1993); United States v. Evans, 928 F.2d 858 (9th Cir.1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. $87,118.00 in United States Currency and $3,490.00 in United States Currency, Appeal Of: Abiodun Oloko
See United States v. Ingram, 979 F.2d 1179, 1184 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 997 , 113 S.Ct. 1616 , 123 L.Ed.2d 176 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Leroy Barnes, and Cheryl Barnes
See United States v. Ingram, 979 F.2d 1179, 1184 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 997 , 113 S.Ct. 1616 , 123 L.Ed.2d 176 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry Butler
See Johnson, 26 F.3d at 695 (citing United States v. Olson, 978 F.2d 1472, 1478 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 997 , 113 S.Ct. 1614 , 123 L.Ed.2d 174 (1993)) (“incredulous” that persons not associated with drug dealer would be allowed to live in house where large drug conspiracy conducted).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William J. Kirk
(2×)
See United States v. Hale, 978 F.2d 1016, 1018 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 997 , 113 S.Ct. 1614 , 123 L.Ed.2d 174 (1993); United States v. Evans, 928 F.2d 858 (9th Cir.1991).
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARIO ESTEBAN MORENO, Sr
See United States v. Barksdale-Contreras, 972 F.2d 111, 113 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1084 and cert. denied, 507 U.S. 997 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BRAD EUGENE BRANCH, KEVIN WHITECLIFF, JAIME CASTILLO, RENOS LENNY AVRAAM, PAUL FATTA AND GRAEME LEONARD CRADDOCK
See United States v. Hale, 978 F.2d 1016 (8th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 997 (1993); United States v. Evans, 928 F.2d 858 (9th Cir. 1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Victor E. Robbins, Sr., A/K/A Gene, Roy G. Robbins, A/K/A Gordon, and James Herriman
However, the court directed that the issue not be raised by either side because “there’s too much potential for confusion and speculation if it is brought up.” Gene Robbins contends that the district court’s refusal to allow that area of cross-examination violated the Confrontation Clause. “[A] district court’s Rule 403 balancing is afforded a special degree of deference: [o]nly in an extreme case are appellate judges competent to second- *844 guess the judgment of the person on the spot, the trial judge.” United States v. Dillard, 43 F.3d 299, 305 (7th Cir.1994) (internal quotat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barapind v. Reno
See, e.g., United States v. Savage, 978 F.2d 1136, 1138 (9th Cir.) (Detrimental rebanee on government’s promise of terms in plea bargaining), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 997 , 113 S.Ct. 1613 , 123 L.Ed.2d 174 (1993); Sun II Yoo v. INS, 534 F.2d 1325 (9th Cir.1976) (conduct of INS estopped government from denying petitioner benefit of precertification).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brecunier
Compare Hickman v. Block, 81 F.3d 98, 101 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 276 , 136 L.Ed.2d 199 (1996) (holding that "the Second Amendment is a right held by the states, and does not protect the possession of a weapon by a private citizen”), with United States v. Gomez, 92 F.3d 770 , 774 n. 7 (9th Cir.1996) ("[t]he Second Amendment embodies the right to defend oneself and one’s home against physical attack”), and United States v. Hale, 978 F.2d 1016, 1020 (8th Cir.1992), ce rt. denied, 507 U.S. 997 , 113 S.Ct. 1614 , 123 L.Ed.2d 174 (1993) (purpose of Second Amendment "…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Edward Hicks
See United States v. Aiken, 974 F.2d 446, 448-49 (4th Cir.1992); United States v. Parker, 960 F.2d 498, 500 (5th Cir.1992); see also United States v. Hale, 978 F.2d 1016, 1018 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 997 (1993). 5 Accordingly, we affirm. 1 The HONORABLE WILLIAM R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Edward Hicks
See United States v. Aiken, 974 F.2d 446, 448-49 (4th Cir. 1992); United States v. Parker, 960 F.2d 498, 500 (5th Cir. 1992); see also United States v. Hale, 978 F.2d 1016, 1018 (8th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 997 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Savage
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 92-7525.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 1993.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.