green
Positive treatment
7.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 38 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Mejia
United States v. Mares, 940 F.2d 455, 461 (9th Cir.1991); but see United States v. Hoac, 990 F.2d 1099, 1103-04 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1120 , 114 S.Ct. 1075 , 127 L.Ed.2d 392 (1994) (relating that the standard of review for prosecutorial comment on a defendant's silence is unclear, but finding that the prosecutor’s comments were permissible under either de novo or abuse of discretion review). .
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Milton Zucker Mende
United States v. Mares, 940 F.2d 455, 461 (9th Cir.1991); but see U.S. v. Hoac, 990 F.2d 1099, 1103-04 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1075 , 127 L.Ed.2d 392 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eliseo Contreras
See United States v. Dortch, 5 F.3d 1056, 1065-66 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1121 , 114 S.Ct. 1077 , 127 L.Ed.2d 394 (1994), and cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1126 , 115 S.Ct. 933 , 130 L.Ed.2d 879 (1995), discussing United States v. Fort, 998 F.2d 542, 543, 546 (7th Cir.1993); cf. Direct Sales Co. v. United States, 319 U.S. 703 , 63 S.Ct. 1265 , 87 L.Ed. 1674 (1943).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Contreras. Eliseo
See United States v. Dortch, 5 F.3d 1056, 1065-66 (7th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1121 , 114 S. Ct. 1077 (1994), and cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1126 , 115 S. Ct. 933 (1995), discussing United States v. Fort, 998 F.2d 542, 543, 546 (7th Cir. 1993); cf. Direct Sales Co. v. United States, 319 U.S. 703 , 63 S. Ct. 1265 (1943).
discussed
Cited "see"
Berres v. Artifex, Ltd.
(2×)
See Stewart v. McGinnis, 5 F.3d 1031, 1034 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1121 , 114 S.Ct. 1075 , 127 L.Ed.2d 393 (1994); Local Rule 6.05(d).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eddie Richardson, Carmen Tate, Rodney Palmer, Nate Hall, Stanley Westmoreland, Martell Lee, Sectric Curry, and Lennel Smith
See United States v. Dortch, 5 F.3d 1056 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1121 , 114 S.Ct. 1077 , 127 L.Ed.2d 394 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Whayne v. State
See Kendall v. Watkins, 998 F.2d 848 (10th Cir.1993) (“[U]nless plaintiff first presented her claims to the proper federal agency and that agency finally denied them, the district court would not have had jurisdiction over plaintiffs FTCA claims.”), cert, denied, 510 U.S. 1120 , 114 S.Ct. 1075 , 127 L.Ed.2d 392 (1994). .Alternatively, the plaintiff clearly has stated no claim under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Whane v. State of Kan.
See Kendall v. Watkins, 998 F.2d 848 (10th Cir.1993) ("[U]nless plaintiff first presented her claims to the proper federal agency and that agency finally denied them, the district court would not have had jurisdiction over plaintiff's FTCA claims."), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1120 , 114 S.Ct. 1075 , 127 L.Ed.2d 392 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Flores
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Paramo, 998 F.2d 1212, 1221 (3d Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1121 , 114 S.Ct. 1076 , 127 L.Ed.2d 393 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tuszkiewicz v. Allen-Bradley Co., Inc.
(2×)
Hartley v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc., 930 F.Supp. 349, 354 (E.D.Wis.1996); see Stewart v. McGinnis, 5 F.3d 1031, 1034 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, *1121 510 U.S. 1121 , 114 S.Ct. 1075 , 127 L.Ed.2d 393 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. City of Milwaukee
(2×)
Hartley v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc., 930 F.Supp. 349, 354 (E.D.Wis.1996); see Stewart v. McGinnis, 5 F.3d 1031, 1034 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1121 , 114 S.Ct. 1075 , 127 L.Ed.2d 393 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jerome D. Jackson v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner
(2×)
McKinney v. Dole, 765 F.2d 1129 , 1135 n. 12 (D.C.Cir.1985); see Stewart v. McGinnis, 5 F.3d 1031, 1034 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1121 , 114 S.Ct. 1075 , 127 L.Ed.2d 393 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
General Cigar Co. v. CR Carriers, Inc.
See United States v. Paramo, 998 F.2d 1212 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1121 , 114 S.Ct. 1076 , 127 L.Ed.2d 393 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Chavez v. Motorola Inc.
See Kendall v. Watkins, 998 F.2d 848, 850 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1075 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eduardo Martinez-Palacios
See United States v. Hoac, 990 F.2d 1099 , 1108 n. 4 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1075 (1994); see also Marsh, 894 F.2d at 1040 .
cited
Cited "see"
Sheridan Square Partnership v. United States
See Kendall v. Watkins, 998 F.2d 848, 850 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied sub nom., --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1075 , 127 L.Ed.2d 392 (1994); Devery Implement Co. v. J.I.
cited
Cited "see"
Sheridan Square Partnership v. United States
See Kendall v. Watkins, 998 F.2d 848, 850 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied sub nom., - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1075 , 127 L.Ed.2d 392 (1994); Devery Implement Co. v. J.I.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stanley W. Akers, Jr., United States of America v. Gary Patrick Callahan
See id. at 1111; United States v. Mares-Molina, 913 F.2d 770, 773-74 (9th Cir. 1990) (not enough to own business leasing warehouse where cocaine was unloaded). 22 The district court found that Callahan arranged for the initial storage and transportation of the cocaine, and supplied 42 kilograms to Bartel. [SER tab 15 pp. 14-16] The evidence at trial also showed that Callahan gave the cocaine to Waltz to store at his home; Callahan removed the cocaine a few days later and gave it to Lindstrom to give to Bartel; and Callahan met with Lindstrom and Bartel to convince Bartel to distribute the coca…
discussed
Cited "see"
Eduardo M. Lucero v. Richard Riley, Secretary, United States Department of Education United States of America
See Kendall v. Watkins, 998 F.2d 848, 852 (10th Cir.1993)(holding that letters requesting "reinstatement, back pay, front pay, damages for alleged blacklisting, and disciplinary action against certain federal employees," did not request a sum certain, and thus did not present an adequate claim), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1075 (1994). 12 We now examine whether summary judgment was properly granted on Mr. Lucero's employment discrimination claims.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jason Eugene Best, United States of America v. Darryl Everett Ward, United States of America v. Rick Martinez
Sec. 3B1.1(c), the court must find that the defendant "exercised some control over others involved in the commission of the offense" or was "responsible for organizing others for the purpose of carrying out the crime." United States v. Mares-Molina, 913 F.2d 770, 773 (9th Cir.1990); see United States v. Hoac, 990 F.2d 1099, 1110-11 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1075 (1994). 10 The facts alleged in the presentence report do not satisfy the Mares-Molina test because they do not show that Ward controlled others or was responsible for organizing others.
discussed
Cited "see"
WERNER v. McCOTTER
See Kendall v. Watkins, 998 F.2d 848, 850 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1075 , 127 L.Ed.2d 392 (1994). 14 Irrespective of the final resolution of Mr. Thomas's equitable claims, summary judgment was properly entered against Mr. Thomas's claims for damages.
cited
Cited "see"
Werner v. McCotter
See Kendall v. Watkins, 998 F.2d 848, 850 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1075 , 127 L.Ed.2d 392 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Randel Salyards
See United States v. Hoac, 990 F.2d 1099, 1110 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1075 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hammitt
This evidence tends to establish a conspiracy because it “suggests that the seller has an interest in the success of the buyer’s re-selling activities, and because it indicates cooperation and trust rather than an arm’s length retail-type sale.” United States v. Ferguson, 35 F.3d 327, 331 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1100 , 115 S.Ct. 1832 , 131 L.Ed.2d 752 (1995); see also United States v. Dortch, 5 F.3d 1056 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1121 , 114 S.Ct. 1077 , 127 L.Ed.2d 394 (1994); United States v. Cabello, 16 F.3d 179 (7th Cir.1994); United States v. Thomas, 12 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. Smithsonian Institution
See 28 C.F.R. § 14.2 (a) (a formal claim is not filed for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2401 (b) until a Federal agency receives from a claimant written notification of an incident “accompanied by a claim for money damages in a sum certain for injury to or loss of property ... and is accompanied by evidence of his authority to present [the] claim”); see also Kendall v. Watkins, 998 F.2d 848, 852 (10th Cir.1993) (plaintiffs letters to federal agency that outlined the type of relief plaintiff wanted but did not state a claim for a sum certain did not satisfy the FTCA’s formal administrative cl…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Xavier Cobblah, Also Known as Basheer, Also Known as Vivi, Also Known as Xavier Richter
United States v. Griffin, 84 F.3d 912, 919 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 495 , 136 L.Ed.2d 387 (1996); see also United States v. Dortch, 5 F.3d 1056, 1068 (7th Cir.1993) (holding that the defendant had waived his objection to government’s use of proffered statements when proffer agreement allows such use), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1121 , 114 S.Ct. 1077 , 127 L.Ed.2d 394 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dominguez
Compare United States v. Sowels, 998 F.2d 249, 251 (5th Cir. 1993) (where defendant stole credit cards, he put fraud victims at risk of losing entire amount of credit available, so use of credit limits of cards was reasonable estimate of intended loss), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1121 , 114 S.Ct. 1076 , 127 L.Ed.2d 393 (1994) with United States v. Allison, 86 F.3d 940, 943-44 (9th Cir. 1996) (declining to follow Sowels in fraud case; insisting on "realistic, economic approach to determining what losses the defendant truly ... intended to cause”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morgan v. Stringer
(2×)
See, e.g., Stewart v. McGinnis, 5 F.8d 1031, 1034 (7th Cir.1993) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1121 , 114 S.Ct. 1075 , 127 L.Ed.2d 393 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tommy G. Asher
The gist of the crime of conspiracy and the characteristic which defines its breadth is the unlawful agreement.” Castro, 629 F.2d at 461 (quoting United States v. Marable, 578 F.2d 151, 153 (5th Cir.1978)); see, e.g., United States v. Dortch 5 F.3d 1056, 1061 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1121 , 114 S.Ct. 1077 , 127 L.Ed.2d 394 (1994).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Javier Reigos Manera, Eliazar Reigos Manera, Ambrosio Pineda Duque
See also United States v. Hoac, 990 F.2d 1099, 1105-06 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1075 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mavourneen Doherty v. City of Chicago, Graham C. Grady, Judith C. Rice
Co. of Ill., 852 F.2d 951 , 955-56 (7th Cir. 1988); see, e.g., Stewart v. McGinnis, 5 F.3d 1031, 1036 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1075 , 127 L.Ed.2d 393 (1994); Easter House v. Felder, 910 F.2d 1387, 1405 (7th Cir.1990) (en banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1067 , 111 S.Ct. 783 , 112 L.Ed.2d 846 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jaime Huerta
See United States v. Brown, 944 F.2d 1377, 1381 (7th Cir.1991); see also United States v. Hoac, 990 F.2d 1099, 1111 (9th Cir.1993) (holding that § 3B1.1 requires more than simply organizing the importation of drugs), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1075 (1994). 14 In fact, the government argued in this case at the sentencing hearing that "for Jaime Huerta, once the cocaine leaves his hands he could care less where it goes." In addition, none of the several witnesses who testified of having made drug purchases from Jaime--Monte Joe Brown, John McCauley, Grant Coombs, and Ben Tomchak--claimed that Jaim…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alfonso Valencia
Id.; see also United States v. Hoac, 990 F.2d 1099, 1110-11 (9th Cir.1993) (holding defendant who opened a trading company to export heroin, arranged for a shipping container, assisted in placing the heroin in cans and loaded the shipping container was not a "leader" under Sec. 3B1.1), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1075 (1994). 35 The district court adopted the relevant facts contained in the presentence report. 2 The presentence report included the following facts: 36 When contacted by [Valim], [Valencia] made methamphetamine available, and he sent his associate, Lopez, to actually deliver the meth…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lasalle Bank Lake View, an Illinois Banking Corporation v. Rafael Seguban and Ellen Seguban
See, e.g., Stewart v. McGinnis, 5 F.3d 1031, 1034 (7th Cir.1993) (collecting eases), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 1075 , 127 L.Ed.2d 393 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salvador Magluta, A/K/A Sal, A/K/A Santiago Menendez, A/K/A Angelo Maretto
See, e.g., United States v. Cure, 996 F.2d 1136, 1137-38 (11th Cir.1993) (stop of car not pretextual due to factual finding that officer stopped vehicle because it was driving without headlights), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1075 , 127 L.Ed.2d 393 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Magluta
See, e.g., United States v. Cure, 996 F.2d 1136, 1137-38 (11th Cir.1993) (stop of car not pretextual due to factual finding that officer stopped vehicle because it was driving without headlights), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1075 , 127 L.Ed.2d 393 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zinn v. Shalala
See, e.g., Stewart v. McGinnis, 5 F.3d 1031, 1039 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1075 , 127 L.Ed.2d 393 (1994); Nanetti v. University of Illinois, 867 F.2d 990, 992-93 (7th Cir.1989); Gekas v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Comm'n, 793 F.2d 846, 849 (7th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zinn ex rel. Blankenship v. Shalala
See, e.g., Stewart v. McGinnis, 5 F.3d 1031, 1039 (7th Cir.1993), ce rt. denied, — U.S.—, 114 S.Ct. 1075 , 127 L.Ed.2d 393 (1994); Nanetti v. University of Illinois, 867 F.2d 990, 992-93 (7th Cir.1989); Gekas v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Comm’n, 793 F.2d 846, 849 (7th Cir.1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stewart
v.
McGinnis
v.
McGinnis
93-6676.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1994.
Published
Stewart
v.
McGinnis et al.
No. 93-6676.
Supreme Court of United States.
February 22, 1994.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 7th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 5 F. 3d 1031.