green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.7 score
“the point at which appellant formulated his intent to take his victim's property is critical to differentiating, in the abstract, between his commission of capital murder in the course of robbery and his commission of first degree murder, followed by theft.”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ryan Harrison v. State
the point at which appellant formulated his intent to take his victim's property is critical to differentiating, in the abstract, between his commission of capital murder in the course of robbery and his commission of first degree murder, followed by theft.
cited
Cited "see"
Delacruz v. State
See Nelson v. State, 848 S.W.2d 126, 132 (Tex. Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 830 , 114 S.Ct. 100 , 126 L.Ed.2d 66 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Perez v. State
See Rodriguez v. State, 609 So.2d 493 (Fla.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 830 , 114 S.Ct. 99 , 126 L.Ed.2d 66 (1993); Snowden v. State, 537 So.2d 1383 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 547 So.2d 1210 (Fla.1989).
cited
Cited "see"
DeJesus v. State
See Rodriguez v. State, 609 So.2d 493 (Fla.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 830 , 114 S.Ct. 99 , 126 L.Ed.2d 66 (1993); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).
examined
Cited "see"
Goff v. State
(4×)
See Nelson v. State, 848 S.W.2d 126 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 830 , 114 S.Ct. 100 , 126 L.Ed.2d 66 (1993) (plurality opinion).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thompson v. State
See, e.g., Parker v. State, 611 So.2d 1224, 1226 (Fla.1992), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1101 , 119 S.Ct. 1580 , 143 L.Ed.2d 675 (1999); see also Rodriguez v. State, 609 So.2d 493, 499 (Fla.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 830 , 114 S.Ct. 99 , 126 L.Ed.2d 66 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ajaj v. United States
See also Prows v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 981 F.2d 466, 468-469, n. 3 (10th Cir.1992) [BOP has authority to designate inmate’s place of confinement], cert. denied, 510 U.S. 830 , 114 S.Ct. 98 , 126 L.Ed.2d 65 (1993); Barden v. Keohane, 921 F.2d 476, 483 (3d Cir.1990) (same); Leibowitz v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 729 F.Supp. 556 , 561 (E.D.Mich.1989) [“Following a conviction, the trial judge cedes all jurisdiction over a convicted federal defendant to the United States Bureau of Prisons....
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jennings
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
92-8448.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1993.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Texas (1)
Jennings
v.
Texas.
No. 92-8448.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 4, 1993.
1
Appeal from the Ct. Crim. App. Tex.
2
Certiorari denied.