green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.4 score
“here one factor predominates to make clear that the district court acted within its discretion . that factor is financial condition.”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Spann v. J.C. Penney Corp.
here one factor predominates to make clear that the district court acted within its discretion . that factor is financial condition.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Spann v. J.C. Penney Corp.
here one factor predominates to make clear that the district court acted with its discretion . that factor is financial condition.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State Ex Rel. Byrd v. Chadwick
aggregate amount of the proposed settlement and the formula for computing recoveries was all that was required
cited
Cited "see"
Calderon v. Coleman
See Hamilton [v. Vasquez, 17 F. 3d 1149, 1163 (CA9), cert. denied, 512 U. S. 1220 (1994)]; cf. Boyde, 494 U. S. at 370 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In re The Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices Litigation
See White v. Nat’l Football League, 41 F.3d 402 , 408 (8th Cir.1994), (finding that notice mailed “approximately one month prior to the first settlement hearing” was adequate notice), cert, denied, 512 U.S. 1220 , 115 S.Ct. 2569 , 132 L.Ed.2d 821 (1995); Torrisi v. Tucson Elec.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices Litigation
See White v. National Football League, 41 F.3d 402, 408 (8th Cir.1994), (finding that notice mailed “appx’oximately one month px'ior to the first settlement heax'-iixg” was adequate ixotice), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1220 , 115 S.Ct. 2569 , 132 L.Ed.2d 821 (1995); Torrisi v. Tucson Elec.
discussed
Cited "see"
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6187, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,127 Separation of Church and State Committee Jeff Lewis Jimi Mathers v. City of Eugene of Lane County, State of Oregon, a Municipal Corporation
(2×)
See Ellis v. City of La Mesa, 990 F.2d 1518, 1528-29 (9th Cir.1993) (discussing remedies), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1220 , 114 S.Ct. 2707 , 129 L.Ed.2d 834 (1994). 40 Despite its secular purpose as a war memorial (with a plaque announcing this fact) and despite its remote location far from any government structures, under Lemon and Allegheny the cross violates the Establishment Clause merely because someone could reasonably perceive the cross as the City's endorsement of the Christian faith.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nebraska Public Power District v. United States
In concluding that the claimant there was not bringing a “disguised” contract claim, the court noted that: (i) the claimant “is not relying on the contract at all;” (ii) “[i]t does not claim a breach of contract;” (iii) “it seeks no monetary damages against the United States;” and (iv) “its claim is not properly characterized as one for specific performance.” Id. at 969; see also North Star Alaska v. United States, 14 F.3d 36, 37-38 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1220 , 114 S.Ct. 2706 , 129 L.Ed.2d 834 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Presidential Gardens Associates v. United States
Instrument, 715 F.2d at 728 ; see also North Star Alaska v. United States, 14 F.3d 36, 38 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1220 , 114 S.Ct. 2706 , 129 L.Ed.2d 834 (1994)(APA does not waive sovereign immunity for contract claims seeking equitable relief).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Presidential Gardens Associates v. United States ex rel. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development
B.K Instrument, 715 F.2d at 728 ; see also North Star Alaska v. United States, 14 F.3d 36, 38 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1220 , 114 S.Ct. 2706 , 129 L.Ed.2d 834 (1994)(APA does not waive sovereign immunity for contract claims seeking equitable relief).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
County of San Diego
v.
Murphy
v.
Murphy
No. 93-1692.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 20, 1994.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: C.D. California (2) · Missouri Court of Appeals (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.