green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
11.5 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case ·
“In reviewing for cumulative error, the court must review all errors preserved for appeal and all plain errors.”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Munoz
in reviewing for cumulative error, the court must review all errors preserved for appeal and all plain errors.
discussed
Cited "see"
Vega-Martinez v. Hospital San Antonio, Inc.
In summary, the First Circuit has held that: When faced with a proffer of expert testimony, the district court must determine whether the expert witness is qualified and has specialized knowledge that will “assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.” Fed.R.Evid. 702; see generally United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1183 (1st Cir.1993) (citing Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 591 , 113 S.Ct. 2786, 2795 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993)), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lachman
See generally United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1216, 1220 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Potter
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1195-96 (1st Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994); Moreno, 991 F.2d at 947 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Santiago-Vazquez
(2×)
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1195-96 (1st Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 (1994); see also United States v. Meserve, 271 F.3d 314, 332 (1st Cir. 2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Banks v. Dretke
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161 , 1195-96 (5th Cir. 1993) (“Individual errors, insufficient in themselves to necessitate a new trial, may in the aggregate have a more debilitating effect”.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ford v. United States
United States v. Thomas, 116 F.3d 606, 616 (2d Cir.1997) (emphasis added); see United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1190 (1st Cir.1993) (trial judge “may instruct the jury on the dimensions of their duty to the exclusion of jury nullification”), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994); United States v. Krzyske, 836 F.2d 1013, 1021 (6th Cir.) (although jury has a “ ‘right’ to reach any verdict it wishes,” court has a “duty ... to instruct the jury only as to the correct law applicable to the particular case”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 , 109 S…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alston
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1190 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alston
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1190 (1st Cir. ___ _____________ _________ 1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Guerrero-Cortez
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1199-1200 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994); United States v. Saccoccia, 58 F.3d 754, 790-91 (1st.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Giovanny Armando Guerrero-Cortez, A/K/A Gil, United States of America v. Roberto Soler, A/K/A Robert, A/K/A Bob, United States of America v. William Gonzalez-Gonzalez
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1199-1200 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994); United States v. Saccoccia, 58 F.3d 754, 790-91 (1st.
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Samuel H. McMahon Jr.
(4×)
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161 , (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994); United States v. Buchanan, 787 F.2d 477 (10th Cir.1986), rav’d on other grounds after remand, 891 F.2d 1436 (10th Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 494 U.S. 1088 , 110 S.Ct. 1829 , 108 L.Ed.2d 958 (1990); United States v. Johnston, 578 F.2d 1352 (10th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 931 , 99 S.Ct. 321 , 58 L.Ed.2d 325 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Elizabeth v. Bogosian v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. And Daimler-Benz North America Corporation
A. Rule 702 Requirements and Standard of Review When faced with a proffer of expert testimony, the district court must determine whether the expert witness is qualified and has specialized knowledge that will “assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.” Fed.R.Evid. 702; see generally United States v. Sepulve da, 15 F.3d 1161 , 1183 (1st Cir.1993) (citing Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 591 , 113 S.Ct. 2786, 2795 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993)), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brad Eugene Branch, Kevin Whitecliff, Jaime Castillo, Renos Lenny Avraam, Paul Fatta and Graeme Leonard Craddock
See United States v. Chapman, 7 F.3d 66, 69 (5th Cir.1993) (holding defendant "waived any error based on this issue as he failed to raise it either in his written objections to the pre-sentence report or orally at the sentencing hearing"), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2713 , 129 L.Ed.2d 839 (1994). 240 Castillo contests the 2-level enhancement for obstruction of justice.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Butterworth
Given the trial judge’s closeness to the scene, this court reverses a denial of a mistrial motion only under “extremely compelling circumstances.” Pierro, 32 F.3d at 617 ; see also United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1184 (1st Cir.1993), ce rt. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sean Carr
L.Rev. 582 (1939), and of the theoretical underpinnings of this practice in the United States, in which legal decisions by juries were sometimes regarded as an expression of faithfulness to the law (regardless of the authority of institutions or officeholders), rather than defiance of the law or "nullification.” Thomas, 116 F.3d at 614 ; see also United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1190 (1st Cir.1993) ("Though jury nullification has a long and sometimes storied past, the case law makes plain that a judge may not instruct the jury anent its history, vitality, or use.” (citation omitte…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Solorio
Circuits have split on the question of whether “the scope of Rule 615 extends beyond the courtroom to permit the court to preclude out-of-court communication between witnesses about the case during trial.” Charles Alan Wright & Victor James Gold, 29 Federal Practice & Procedure § 6243, at 61 (1997); compare United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1176 (1st Cir.1993) (stating that Rule 615 authorizes a trial court to “ ‘order witnesses excluded’ only from the courtroom proper”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994), with United …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Ruiz Solorio (01-5602) Ricky Martin Luna (01-5603) Delmas Dennis (01-5666) Marco Juarez (01-5667)
Circuits have split on the question of whether "the scope of Rule 615 extends beyond the courtroom to permit the court to preclude out-of-court communication between witnesses about the case during trial." Charles Alan Wright & Victor James Gold, 29 Federal Practice & Procedure § 6243, at 61 (1997); compare United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1176 (1st Cir. 1993) (stating that Rule 615 authorizes a trial court to "`order witnesses excluded' only from the courtroom proper") (citation omitted), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994), with United States v. Pr…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Martin Gonzalez Munoz
See United States v. Labarbera, 581 F.2d 107, 110 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Rothstein, 530 F.2d 1275, 1280 (5th Cir.1976); see also United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1195-96 (1st Cir.1993) (explaining the cumulative error doctrine), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994); United States v. Necoechea, 986 F.2d 1273, 1282-83 (9th Cir.1993) (“In reviewing for cumulative error, the court must review all errors preserved for appeal and all plain errors.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Derrick Jarrett, Lawrence McCarroll Jeffrey Brock, Jamie J. Key, Dwight Anderson, Samir Hameen, and Judy McCarroll
See also United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1197 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994) (vacating sentence based on unsup *531 ported average drug quantities and number of smuggling trips).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas
See United States v. Edwards, 101 F.3d 17, 19-20 (2d Cir.1996) (citing cases); see also United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1190 (1st Cir.1993), ce rt. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994); Dougherty, 473 F.2d at 1136-37.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas
See United States v. Edwards, 101 F.3d 17, 19-20 (2d Cir.1996) (citing cases); see also United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1190 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994); Dougherty, 473 F.2d at 1136-37 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sule
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 93-8807.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 20, 1994.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.