Becerra-Flores v. United States, 513 U.S. 906 (1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Becerra-Flores v. United States, 513 U.S. 906 (1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dean v. Mozingo (mssd, 2007-09-26) · Strongest negative: Kiowa Indian Tribe v. Hoover (ca10, 1998-07-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Kiowa Indian Tribe v. Hoover
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Liedtke v. State Bar of Texas, 18 F.3d 315, 317 (5th Cir.1994) (indicating “specific law” may allow federal district court to entertain collateral attack on state court judgment), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 906 , 115 S.Ct. 271 , 130 L.Ed.2d 189 (1994).
cited Cited "see" Dean v. Mozingo
S.D. Miss. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lindsay v. Mozingo, 24 F.3d 237 (5th Cir.) (a one-page opinion), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 906 , 115 S.Ct. 272 , 130 L.Ed.2d 189 (1994).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Caruthers
6th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Maness, 23 F.3d 1006, 1008-09 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 906 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Ricky A. Caruthers (2×)
6th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Maness, 23 F.3d 1006, 1008-09 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 906 , 115 S.Ct. 271 , 130 L.Ed.2d 189 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" Sookma v. Millard
5th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
Based on our review of the record and briefs, the district court did not err in applying this doctrine, in the light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp. — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 1517, 1521-22 , 161 L.Ed.2d 454 (2005) (applying the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and confining it to “cases brought by state-court losers complaining of injuries caused by state-court judgments rendered before the district court proceedings commenced and inviting district court review and rejection of those judgments”); see Liedtke v. State Bar of Texas, 18 F.3d 315…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Stewart
D. Kan. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
Lego v. Twomey, 404 U.S. 477, 489 , 92 S.Ct. 619 , 30 L.Ed.2d 618 (1972); see United States v. Robertson, 19 F.3d 1318, 1321 (10th Cm.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 906 , 115 S.Ct. 271 , 130 L.Ed.2d 189 (1994). “[Cjoercive police activity is a necessary predicate to the finding that a confession is not ‘voluntary.’ ” Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 167 , 107 S.Ct. 515 , 93 L.Ed.2d 473 (1986); United States v. Robertson, 19 F.3d at 1321 (“In other words, the police must somehow overreach by exploiting a weakness or condition known to exist.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Becerra-Flores
v.
United States
No. 94-5550.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1994.
513 U.S. 906
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.