Ross v. United States, 515 U.S. 1132 (1995). · Go Syfert
Ross v. United States, 515 U.S. 1132 (1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“an anonymous jury raises the specter that the defendant is a dangerous person from whom jurors must be protected, thereby implicating the defendant's constitutional right to a presumption of innocence.”
60 citation events (28 in the last 25 years) across 28 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Sundberg (or, 2011-02-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Sundberg
Or. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
an anonymous jury raises the specter that the defendant is a dangerous person from whom jurors must be protected, thereby implicating the defendant's constitutional right to a presumption of innocence.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Donna J. Johnson
8th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. McGuire, 45 F.3d 1177, 1188 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1132 (1995).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Donna J. Johnson
8th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. McGuire, 45 F.3d 1177, 1188 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1132 , 115 S.Ct. 2558 , 132 L.Ed.2d 811 (1995).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Baxley (2×)
Haw. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Samonte, 83 Hawai`i 507, 518-19, 928 P.2d 1, 12 (1996) ("[A] criminal defendant has a constitutional right to a presumption of innocence." (Citing United States v. Ross, 33 F.3d 1507, 1519 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1132 , 115 S.Ct. 2558 , 132 L.Ed.2d 812 (1995).)).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Collins
D.S.D. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. McGuire, 45 F.3d 1177, 1187 (8th Cir.) ("the Confrontation Clause is not violated by the admission into evidence of a non-testifying co-defendant's admission of a crime so long as a proper limiting instruction is given and the admission does not refer to the defendant."), cert denied, 515 U.S. 1132 , 115 S.Ct. 2558 , 132 L.Ed.2d 811 (1995); United States v. Miller, 995 F.2d 865, 866-67 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 510 U.S. 1018 , 114 S.Ct. 618 , 126 L.Ed.2d 583 (1993) (no error in the refusal to sever a co-defendant's trial where redacted version of out-of-court statement mad…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Collins
D.S.D. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. McGuire, 45 F.3d 1177, 1187 (8th Cir.) (“the Confrontation Clause is not violated by the admission into evidence of a non-testifying co-defendant’s admission of a crime so long as a proper limiting instruction is given and the admission does not refer to the defendant.”), cert denied, 515 U.S. 1132 , 115 S.Ct. 2558 , 132 L.Ed.2d 811 (1995); United States v. Miller, 995 F.2d 865, 866-67 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1018 , 114 S.Ct. 618 , 126 L.Ed.2d 583 (1993) (no error in the refusal to sever a co-defendant’s trial where redacted version of out-of-court state…
cited Cited "see" Softball Country Club-Atlanta v. Decatur Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
11th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Daniel v. City of Tampa, Florida, 38 F.3d 546, 549 (11th Cir.1994), ce rt. denied, 515 U.S. 1132 , 115 S.Ct. 2557 , 132 L.Ed.2d 811 (1995).
discussed Cited "see" John S. Freund v. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General
11th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ross, 33 F.3d 1507, 1523 (11th Cir.1994) (“If the conflict [between the interests of the former client and the new client] could cause the defense attorney improperly to use privileged communications in cross-examination, the disqualification [of the attorney in the new client’s case] is appropriate.”), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1132 , 115 S.Ct. 2558 , 132 L.Ed.2d 812 (1995); see also Fitzpatrick v. McCormick, 869 F.2d 1247, 1252 (9th Cir.) (“[Preservation of a proper attorney-client relationship requires ‘a rule that prevents attorneys from accepting representation…
discussed Cited "see" UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANA YUBY PAYAN-PAZ
unknown court · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Patten, 40 F.3d 774, 776 (5th Cir. 1994) (finding “no constitutional violation if the district court includes the full quantity of drugs involved in the conspiracy and not just the quantity of drugs in the count of conviction”), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1132 (1995).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Honken
N.D. Iowa · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Ross, 33 F.3d 1507, 1519 (11th Cir.1994) (withholding names, addresses, places of employment, and spouses’ names and places of employment), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1132 , 115 S.Ct. 2558 , 132 L.Ed.2d 812 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ross
v.
United States
No. 94-1875.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 12, 1995.
515 U.S. 1132

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.