green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Glen Coe v. Ricky Bell, Warden
See Cremeans v. Chaplean, 62 F.3d 167, 169 (6th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1096 , 116 S.Ct. 822 , 133 L.Ed.2d 765 (1996); Levine v. Torvik, 986 F.2d 1506, 1514 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 907 , 113 S.Ct. 3001 , 125 L.Ed.2d 694 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coe v. Bell
See Court has not established a clear “rule” requiring a certain Cremeans v. Chapleau, 62 F.3d 167, 169 (6th Cir. 1995), result, this court has concluded that the “unreasonable cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1096 (1996); Levine v. Torvik, 986 application” prong of § 2254(d)(1) applies.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald G. Ford (97-6097/6270) Sandra Hutchins Ford (97-6271)
See Cremeans v. Chapleau, 62 F.3d 167, 169 (6th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1096 , 116 S.Ct. 822 , 133 L.Ed.2d 765 (1996); Levine v. Torvik, 986 F.2d 1506, 1514 (6th Cir.) (relying in part on Card v. Singletary, 963 F.2d 1440, 1443-44 (11th Cir.1992), which was vacated and amended in relevant part, 981 F.2d 481, 483-84 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 839 , 114 S.Ct. 121 , 126 L.Ed.2d 86 (1993)), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 907 , 113 S.Ct. 3001 , 125 L.Ed.2d 694 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Irizarry v. State
See also, Finney v. State, 660 So.2d 674 (Fla.1995) (similarity is not always a prerequisite to admissibility), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1096 , 116 S.Ct. 823 , 133 L.Ed.2d 766 (1996); Williams v. State, 621 So.2d 413 (Fla.1993) (explaining that other crimes, whether factually similar or dissimilar to the charged crime, are admissible if the evidence is relevant to prove a matter of consequence other than bad character or propensity).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morse v. Trippett
Additionally, this Court must presume the correctness of state court factual determinations. 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (e)(1) 2 ; see also Cremeans v. Chapleau, 62 F.3d 167, 169 (6th Cir.1995), cert. denied 516 U.S. 1096 , 116 S, Ct. 822, 133 L.Ed.2d 765 (1996). (“We give complete deference to state court findings unless they are clearly erroneous.”) An application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted with respect to any claim that was adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings unless the adjudication …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harries v. State
See also Cremeans v. Chaplean, 62 F.3d 167, 169 (6th Cir.1995), cert. denied 516 U.S. 1096 , 116 S.Ct. 822 , 133 L.Ed.2d 765 (1996) (finding that mixed question of law and fact is not entitled to deference).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McMoore
v.
New York
v.
New York
No. 95-6886.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 22, 1996.
Published
App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 3d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.