green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.1 score
“federal courts sitting in diversity apply the forum state's conflict of laws rules.”
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Chen v. Target Corporation
federal courts sitting in diversity apply the forum state's conflict of laws rules.
cited
Cited "see"
Rhode Island Charities Trust v. Engelhard Corp.
See id. (quoting EEOC v. Steamship Clerks Union Local 1066, 48 F.3d 594 , 603 n. 8 (1st Cir.)), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 814 , 116 S.Ct. 65 , 133 L.Ed.2d 27 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brule
Compare, e.g ., State v. Brun, 190 Ariz. 505 , 950 P.2d 164, 165 (Ct.App.1997) (relying on United States v. Gallegos-Curiel, 681 F.2d 1164, 1171 (9th Cir.1982) as authority for abuse of discretion standard without discussing conflicting cases in the 9th Circuit), with United States v. Noushfar, 78 F.3d 1442, 1446 (9th Cir.1996) (remarking that the “proper standard of review for vindictive prosecution is unsettled,” different panels in that Circuit having “ ‘variously applied abuse of discretion, clearly erroneous, and de novo standards’ ”) (quoting United States v. Montoya, 45 F.3d…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Montoya et ux.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 94-1967.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1995.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: D. Minnesota (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.