In re Stiles, 519 U.S. 1006 (1996). · Go Syfert
In re Stiles, 519 U.S. 1006 (1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
94 citation events (60 in the last 25 years) across 36 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Turner v. Sheriff of Marion County (insd, 2000-03-01) · Strongest negative: Sanchez v. Pereira-Castillo (ca1, 2009-12-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Sanchez v. Pereira-Castillo
1st Cir. · 2009 · signal: but see · confidence high
Although the Supreme Court in Hudson "foreclosed any [F]ourth [A]mendment challenge to the search of a prison cell,” this court, like those in most other circuits, “has recognized a qualitative difference between property searches and searches of a prisoner’s person.” Dunn v. White, 880 F.2d 1188, 1191 (10th Cir.1989); see Bonitz v. Fair, 804 F.2d 164 , 170 n. 6 (1st Cir.1986) (overruled on other grounds by Unwin v. Campbell, 863 F.2d 124 (1st Cir.1988) (noting that after Hudson , "plaintiffs can no longer claim that their cells or other parts of the prison were unreasonably searched,�…
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Turner v. Sheriff of Marion County
S.D. Ind. · 2000 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he fourth amendment requires that the length and scope of a detention be 'strictly tied to and justified by the circumstances which rendered its initiation permissible.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." FemHealth USA, Inc. v. Williams
M.D. Tenn. · 2022 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Cir. 2001); see, e.g., United States v. Soderna, 82 F.3d 1370, 1377 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied sub nom, Hatch v. United States, 519 U.S. 1006 (1996) (even making access “unreasonably difficult” violates the FACE Act).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Byrd v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Deeb v. State, 815 S.W.2d 692, 697-98 (Tex.Cr.App.1991), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1223 , 112 S.Ct. 3038 , 120 L.Ed.2d 907 (1992) (same); see also United States v. DiDomenico, 78 F.3d 294, 303-04 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1006 , 117 S. Ct.507, 136 L.Ed.2d 398 (1996) (criticizing this agency rationale). 7 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lay v. Porker
C.D. Cal. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Johnson v. Phelan, 69 F.3d 144, 146 (7th Cir.1995) (opposite-sex monitoring of naked prisoners permissible under Fourth Amendment), ce rt. denied, 519 U.S. 1006 , 117 S.Ct. 506 , 136 L.Ed.2d 397 (1996); Timm v. Gunter, 917 F.2d 1093, 1101-02 (8th Cir.1990). (oppositesex pat searches and monitoring of naked prisoners did not violate inmates’ privacy rights), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1209 , 111 S.Ct. 2807 , 115 L.Ed.2d 979 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Stiles and In re Gaydos
No. 96-6135; No. 96-6189.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 2, 1996.
519 U.S. 1006

Petitions for writs of mandamus denied.