Allentown Mack Sales & Serv., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 520 U.S. 1103 (1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Allentown Mack Sales & Serv., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 520 U.S. 1103 (1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “technical obsolescence of computer equipment in a field marked by rapid technological advances is information within the public domain”
162 citation events (107 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Splash Technology Holdings Inc. Securities Litigation (cand, 2001-08-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In Re Splash Technology Holdings Inc. Securities Litigation
N.D. Cal. · 2001 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
technical obsolescence of computer equipment in a field marked by rapid technological advances is information within the public domain
cited Cited "see" State v. Bletsch
Conn. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc., 238 Conn. 216, 232 , 680 A.2d 127 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S. Ct. 1106 , 137 L.
cited Cited "see" Vermont Wholesale Building Products, Inc. v. J.W. Jones Lumber Co.
N.H. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brother Records v. HarperCollins Publishers, 141 N.H. 322, 324-25 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 (1997).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. St. Luke's Subacute Care Hospital, Inc.
9th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Taylor, 66 F.3d 254 (9th Cir.1995) (per curiam) (implicitly rejecting, without affirmatively holding, that there is no materiality requirement under § 287), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S.Ct. 1105 , 137 L.Ed.2d 307 (1997); see also Li v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 892 (9th Cir.2004) (stating, without affirmatively holding, that there is no materiality requirement under § 287). 2 Conse quently, there is no “known right” that appellants could possibly have waived.
cited Cited "see" Thomas v. Telegraph Publishing Co.
N.H. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brother Records v. HarperCollins Publishers, 141 N.H. 322, 328 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 (1997).
cited Cited "see" Commissioner of Labor v. C.J.M. Services, Inc.
Conn. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc., 238 Conn. 216, 232-33 , 680 A.2d 127 (1996) [cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S. Ct. 1106 , 137 L.
cited Cited "see" Nursing Home Pension Fund v. Oracle Corp.
N.D. Cal. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Stac Electronics Securities Litigation, 89 F.3d 1399 , 1405 n. 4 (9th Cir.1996), cert denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S.Ct. 1105 , 137 L.Ed.2d 308 (1997).
cited Cited "see" Metcalf v. Lawson
N.H. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brother Records v. HarperCollins Publishers, 141 N.H. 322, 324 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 (1997).
cited Cited "see" Suffield Development Associates Ltd. Partnership v. National Loan Investors, L.P.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc., 238 Conn. 216, 232-33 , 680 A.2d 127 (1996) [cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S. Ct. 1106 , 137 L.
cited Cited "see" Skillsoft Corp. v. Harcourt General, Inc.
N.H. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brother Records v. HarperCollins Publishers, 141 N.H. 322, 324 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 (1997).
cited Cited "see" Saunders v. Stigers
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc., 238 Conn. 216, 232-33 , 680 A.2d 127 (1996) [cert, denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S. Ct. 1106 , 137 L.
cited Cited "see" Gazo v. City of Stamford
Conn. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc., 238 Conn. 216, 232-33 , 680 A.2d 127 (1996) [cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S. Ct. 1106 , 137 L.
cited Cited "see" Staffing Network, Inc. v. Pietropaolo
N.H. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brother Records v. HarperCollins Publishers, 141 N.H. 322, 324 , 682 A.2d 714, 716 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 (1997).
cited Cited "see" In Re Autodesk, Inc. Securities Litigation
N.D. Cal. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Stac Electronics Securities Litigation, 89 F.3d 1399 , 1405 n.4 (9th Cir.1996). cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S.Ct. 1105 , 137 L.Ed.2d 308 (1997).
cited Cited "see" Muniz v. Kravis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc., 238 Conn. 216, 232-33 , 680 A.2d 127 (1996) [cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S. Ct. 1106 , 137 L.
cited Cited "see" Jewish Home for Elderly of Fairfield County, Inc. v. Cantore
Conn. App. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc., 238 Conn. 216, 232-33 , 680 A.2d 127 (1996) [cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S. Ct. 1106 , 137 L.
cited Cited "see" Doe v. Yale University
Conn. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc., 238 Conn. 216, 232-33 , 680 A.2d 127 (1996) [cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S. Ct. 1106 , 137 L.
cited Cited "see" Lombard v. Edward J. Peters, Jr., P.C.
Conn. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc., 238 Conn. 216, 232-33 , 680 A.2d 127 (1996) [cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S. Ct. 1106 , 137 L.
discussed Cited "see" Torres v. City of Waterbury
Conn. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
To summarize, on the evidence presented and the testimony elicited at trial, in light of the traditionally high level of deference appellate courts give to a trial court’s findings of fact; see Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc., 238 Conn. 216, 232 , 680 A.2d 127 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S. Ct. 1106 , 137 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Daniels
Conn. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc., 238 Conn. 216, 232 , 680 A.2d 127 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S. Ct. 1106 , 137 L.
cited Cited "see" Pamela B. v. Ment
Conn. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc., 238 Conn. 216, 232-33 , 680 A.2d 127 (1996) [cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S. Ct. 1106 , 137 L.
cited Cited "see" United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Marburg
Conn. App. Ct. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc., 238 Conn. 216, 228 , 680 A.2d 127 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S. Ct. 1106 , 137 L.
cited Cited "see" Mmi Investments, L.L.C. v. Eastern Co.
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc., 238 Conn. 216, 224-28 , 680 A.2d 127 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S. Ct. 1106 , 137 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kidd v. Andrews
W.D.N.Y. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Hiser v. Franklin, 94 F.3d 1287, 1291 (9th Cir.1996) (“the general rule is *337 that a class action suit seeking only declaratory and injunctive relief does not bar subsequent individual damage claims by class members, even if based on the same events”) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S.Ct. 1106 , 137 L.Ed.2d 308 (1997); In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (“MTBE”) Products Liability Litigation, 209 F.R.D. 323, 339 (S.D.N.Y.2002) (“courts generally allow plaintiffs in class actions to sue for injunctive relief on behalf of the class and then bring damages…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Willow Funding Co., L.P. v. Grencom Associates
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc., 238 Conn. 216, 232-33 , 680 A.2d 127 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S. Ct. 1106 , 137 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Plevy v. Haggerty
C.D. Cal. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
“In order to be liable for unreasonably disclosed third-party forecasts, defendants must have put their imprimatur, express or implied, on the projections.” In re Syntex Corp. Securities Litigation, 95 F.3d 922, 934 (9th Cir.1996); see also In re Stac Electronics Securities Litigation, 89 F.3d 1399, 1410 (9th Cir.1996) (same), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S.Ct. 1105 , 137 L.Ed.2d 308 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Allentown Mack Sales & Service, Inc.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 96-795.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1997.
520 U.S. 1103
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: N.D. California (1)

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted.