green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.3 score
“by defining certain terminable leases as 'sales' within the , the legislature has made clear its intent to subject these terminable leases to the same consumer protection laws as ordinary credit sales”
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Silva v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.
by defining certain terminable leases as 'sales' within the , the legislature has made clear its intent to subject these terminable leases to the same consumer protection laws as ordinary credit sales
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bittinger v. Tecumseh Products Company
because of the fact-intensive nature of these inquiries, there is no clear test that can be employed to determine if virtual representation is appropriate.
discussed
Cited "see"
Perez v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.
See Fogie v. THORN Americas, Inc., 95 F.3d 645, 648, 650-654 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1166 , 117 S.Ct. 1427 , 137 L.Ed. 2d 536 (1997); Miller v. Colortyme, Inc., 518 N.W. 2d 544, 547-551 (Minn.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,329 Pamela Morales, Guardian of Gary Thompson Bank of the Bluegrass and Trust Co., Conservator of Gary Thompson, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Honda R&d Co., Ltd., Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Pamela Morales, Third-Party
See Brock v. Caterpillar, Inc., 94 F.3d 220, 224 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied 520 U.S. 1166 , 117 S.Ct. 1428 , 137 L.Ed.2d 537 (1997); see also Montgomery Elevator Co. v. McCullough, 676 S.W.2d 776, 783 (Ky.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. v. Torchmark Corp.
Tea Co., 790 F.2d 894 , 899 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 904 , 108 S.Ct. 1074 , 99 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988); see also Tyus v. Schoemehl, 93 F.3d 449, 455 (8th Cir.1996) (court will apply virtual representation only when existence of special relationship between parties justifies preclusion), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1166 , 117 S.Ct. 1427 , 137 L.Ed.2d 536 (1997); Becherer v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 43 F.3d 1054, 1070 (6th Cir.) (virtual representation demands express or implied legal relationship in which parties to first suit are accountable to non-parties who file subse…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McKenzie Engineering Company, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner
The doctrine of issue preclusion holds that “once a court has decided an issue of fact or law necessary to its judgment, that decision may preclude relitigation of the issue in a suit on a different cause of action involving a party to the first case.” Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 94 , 101 S.Ct. 411 , 66 L.Ed.2d 308 (1980); see also Tyus v. Schoemehl, 93 F.3d 449, 453 (8th Cir.1996) (listing requirements for preclusion to apply), ce rt. denied, 520 U.S. 1166 , 117 S.Ct. 1427 , 137 L.Ed.2d 536 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morris v. CORNERSTONE PROPANE PARTNERS
(2×)
Tea Co., 790 F.2d 894 , 899 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 904 , 108 S.Ct. 1074 , 99 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988); see also Tyus v. Schoemehl, 93 F.3d 449, 455 (8th Cir.1996) (court will apply virtual representation only when existence of special relationship between parties justifies preclusion), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1166 , 117 S.Ct. 1427 , 137 L.Ed.2d 536 (1997); Becherer v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 43 F.3d 1054, 1070 (6th Cir.) (virtual representation demands express or implied legal relationship in which parties to first suit are accountable to non-parties who file subse…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
WADDEKK & REED FINANCIAL, INC. v. Torchmark Corp.
Tea Co., 790 F.2d 894 , 899 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 904 , 108 S.Ct. 1074 , 99 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988); see also Tyus v. Schoemehl, 93 F.3d 449, 455 (8th Cir.1996) (court will apply virtual representation only when existence of special relationship between parties justifies preclusion), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1166 , 117 S.Ct. 1427 , 137 L.Ed.2d 536 (1997); Becherer v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 43 F.3d 1054, 1070 (6th Cir.) (virtual representation demands express or implied legal relationship in which parties to first suit are accountable to non-parties who file subse…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. v. Torchmark Corp.
Tea Co., 790 F.2d 894 , 899 (3d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 904 , 108 S.Ct. 1074 , 99 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988); see also Tyus v. Schoemehl, 93 F.3d 449, 455 (8th Cir.1996) (“A court will apply virtual representation only when it finds the existence of some special relationship between the parties justifying preclusion.”), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1166 , 117 S.Ct. 1427 , 137 L.Ed.2d 536 (1997); Becherer v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 43 F.3d 1054, 1070 (6th Cir.) (“Virtual representation demands the existence of an express or implied legal relationship in which parties to t…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Statewide Reapportionment Advisory Committee
v.
Beasley, Governor of South Carolina
v.
Beasley, Governor of South Carolina
No. 96-1201.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 14, 1997.
520 U.S. 1166
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1) · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.