green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Raines
See State v. Neal, 346 N.C. 608, 618 , 487 S.E.2d 734, 740-41 (1997) (defendant cannot show prejudice unless he has exhausted all peremptory challenges (citing State v. Mash, 328 N.C. 61, 64 , 399 S.E.2d 307, 310 (1991))), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1125 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Hucker v. City of Beaumont
See Tamez v. City of San Marcos, 118 F.3d 1085, 1091 (5th Cir.1997), cert, denied, 522 U.S. 1125 , 118 S.Ct. 1073 , 140 L.Ed.2d 132 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nelson v. Stalder
See Tamez v. City of San Marcos, 118 F.3d 1085, 1092 (5th Cir.1997) (“An official acts within his discretionary authority when he performs nonministerial acts within the boundaries of his official capacity.”), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1125 , 118 S.Ct. 1073 , 140 L.Ed.2d 132 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Casanova v. City of Brookshire
Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, “government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818-19 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982); see Tamez v. City of San Marcos, 118 F.3d 1085, 1091 (5th Cir.1997), 522 U.S. 1125 , 118 S.Ct. 1073 , 140 L.Ed.2d 132 (1998); Hart, 127 F.3d at 441 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Casanova v. City of Brookshire
Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, "government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known." Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818-19 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982); see Tamez v. City of San Marcos, 118 F.3d 1085, 1091 (5th Cir.1997), 522 U.S. 1125 , 118 S.Ct. 1073 , 140 L.Ed.2d 132 (1998); Hart, 127 F.3d at 441 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Exide Technologies
See, e.g., Tamez v. City of San Marcos, 118 F.3d 1085, 1098 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied 522 U.S. 1125 , 118 S.Ct. 1073 , 140 L.Ed.2d 132 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Williams
Ed. 2d 91 (1998); see also State v. Neal, 346 N.C. 608, 617-18 , 487 S.E.2d 734, 739-40 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1125 , 140 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fabian
v.
Justo
v.
Justo
No. 97-7113.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1998.
Published
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.