green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
DeRosa v. State
See Al-Mosawi v. State, 1996 OK CR 59 , 929 P.2d 270, 284 ("A trial court's admonition to the jury to disregard the remarks of counsel or a witness usually cures any error[,] unless it is of such nature, after considering the evidence, that the error appears to have determined the verdict.”), cer t. denied, 522 U.S. 852 , 118 S.Ct. 145 , 139 L.Ed.2d 92 (1997). 98 .
cited
Cited "see"
Matthews v. State
See Al Mosawi v. State, 1996 OK CR 59, ¶33 , 929 P.2d 270, 280 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 852 , 118 S.Ct. 145 , 139 L.Ed.2d 92 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hooks v. State of Alaska
See also Abdul–Akbar v. Dep’t of Corr., 910 F. Supp. 986 (D.Del., 1995), aff’d, 111 F.3d 125 (3d Cir.) (table decision), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 852 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lopez
Accordingly, we conclude the defendant has abandoned this claim of prejudice. [11] See also United States v. Stevens, 223 F.3d 239, 244 (3d Cir.2000) (structural errors at sentencing involve "`very limited class of cases'" including "deprivation of counsel during the sentencing hearing itself . . . abdication of judicial role by authorizing a probation officer to determine the manner of restitution . . . and in absentia sentencing" [citations omitted]), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1179 , 121 S.Ct. 1157 , 148 L.Ed.2d 1018 (2001); compare United States v. Beltran, 109 F.3d 365, 371 (7th Cir.) (trial …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lopez
Ed. 2d 1018 (2001); compare United States v. Beltran, 109 F.3d 365, 371 (7th Cir.) (trial court’s reliance on information that was not disclosed to defendant until immediately before sentencing hearing is generally improper, but impropriety is harmless if it could not have changed result), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 852 , 118 S. Ct. 145 , 139 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Welch v. State
See also Al-Mosawi v. State, 1996 OK CR 59, ¶ 59 , 929 P.2d 270, 284 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 852 , 118 S.Ct. 145 , 189 L.Ed.2d 92 (1997) (a trial court's admonition to the jury to disregard the remarks of counsel or a witness usually cures any error unless it is of such nature, after considering the evidence, that the error appears to have determined the verdict).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Obermeyer
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 96-9486.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1997.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.