green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Akee v. Dow Chemical Co.
See Papike v. Tambrands, Inc., 107 F.3d 737 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 862 , 118 S.Ct. 166 , 139 L.Ed.2d 110 (1997) (consumer cannot expect a product to perform more safely than government mandated warnings); see also Oken v. Monsanto Co., 218 F.Supp.2d 1361 (S.D.Fla.2002) (consumer expectations test necessarily involves consideration of warnings given to the public, and thus, a design defect claim on this theory is preempted by FIFRA); Eriksen v. Mobay Corp., 110 Wash.App. 332 , 41 P.3d 488 (2002) (design defect claim based on consumer expectations theory preempted by FIFRA); Reece v.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Akee v. Dow Chemical Co.
See Papike v. Tambrands, Inc., 107 F.3d 737 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 862 , 118 S.Ct. 166 , 139 L.Ed.2d 110 (1997) (consumer cannot expect a product to perform more safely than government mandated warnings); see also Oken v. Monsanto Co., 218 F.Supp.2d 1361 (S.D.Fla.2002) (consumer expectations test necessarily involves consideration of warnings given to the public, and thus, a design defect claim on this theory is preempted by FIFRA); Eriksen v. Mobay Corp., 110 Wash.App. 332 , 41 P.3d 488 (2002) (design defect claim based on consumer expectations theory preempted by FIFRA); Reece v.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McSperitt v. Hartford Life Insurance
See also Cypress Fairbanks Medical Center Inc. v. Pan-American Life Insurance Company, 110 F.3d 280, 283 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 862 , 118 S.Ct. 167 , 139 L.Ed.2d 110 (1997); Foley v. Southwest Texas HMO, Inc., 226 F.Supp.2d 886, 894 (E.D.Tex.2002); Baylor University Medical Center v. Arkansas Blue *426 Cross Blue Shield, 331 F.Supp.2d 502, 507 (N.D.Tex.2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baylor University Medical Center v. Epoch Group, L.C.
See also Cypress Fairbanks Medical Center Inc. v. Pan-American Life Insurance *758 Company, 110 F.3d 280, 283 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 862 , 118 S.Ct. 167 , 139 L.Ed.2d 110 (1997); Foley v. Southwest Texas HMO, Inc., 226 F.Supp.2d 886, 894 (E.D.Tex.2002); Baylor University Medical Center v. Arkansas Blue Cross Blue Shield (‘Baylor I”), 331 F.Supp.2d 502, 507 (N.D.Tex.2004) (Fish, Chief J.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baylor University Medical Center v. Arkansas Blue Cross Blue Shield
See also Cypress Fairbanks Medical Center Inc. v. Pan-American Life Insurance Company, 110 F.3d 280, 283 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 862 , 118 S.Ct. 167 , 139 L.Ed.2d 110 (1997); Foley v. Southwest Texas HMO, Inc., 226 F.Supp.2d 886, 894 (E.D.Tex.2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hill
In short, his conviction, in contrast to a felony conviction, carries no collateral legal consequences that he will suffer from or otherwise be exposed to. 5 Broughton v. North Carolina, 717 F.2d 147, 149 (4th Cir.1983) (misdemeanor contempt conviction creates no lingering consequences making released petitioner’s ha-beas petition moot), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 940 , 104 S.Ct. 1917 , 80 L.Ed.2d 464 (1984); see also Puchner v. Kruziki, 111 F.3d 541, 543-44 (7th Cir.) (contempt order under which petitioner was incarcerated and released, did not carry the kinds of collateral consequences that wo…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dilling Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 97-84.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1997.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.