green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Garcia
See United States v. Greer, 137 F.3d 247, 249 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 920 , 118 S.Ct. 2305 , 141 L.Ed.2d 164 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Smith
See United States v. Smith, 133 F.3d 737, 740, 752 (10th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 920 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Roberts, Jr.
See United States v. Roper, 135 F.3d 430, 434 (6th Cir.) (“The salient issue is the role the defendant played in relation to the activity for which the court held him or her accountable.”), cer t. denied, 524 U.S. 920 , 118 S.Ct. 2306 , 141 L.Ed.2d 165 (1998); United States v. Walton, 908 F.2d 1289, 1303 (6th Cir.) (explaining that although the defendants were “minor participants if one compares their activities to the scope of the conspiracy as a whole,” they were not entitled to a minor role reduction because they were “held responsible [only] for cocaine that they were actively in…
discussed
Cited "see"
Fannon v. Johnston
See United States v. Roper, 135 F.3d 430, 433-34 (6th Cir.1998) (defendant’s testimony that he had not previously engaged in drug transactions permitted government to offer specific evidence of such prior activities), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 920 , 118 S.Ct. 2306 , 141 L.Ed.2d 165 (1998); United States v. Rodgers, 4 F.3d 995 (Table), 1993 WL 330642 at *1-2 (6th Cir.1993) (unpublished opinion) (defendant’s cross examination of government witness regarding defendant’s drug dealing activities permitted government to clarify the nature of those activities); see also United States v. Meacham, 7…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Mendoza
See United States v. Wright, 131 F.3d 1111, 1112 (4th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 66 U.S.L.W. 3782 (U.S. June 8, 1998) (No. 97-9034).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas
See United States v. Wright, 131 F.3d 1111, 1112-13 (4th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, #6D 6D6D# U.S. ___, 66 U.S.L.W. 3782 (U.S. June 8, 1998) (No. 97-9034); United States v. Levy, 703 F.2d 791, 792 (4th Cir. 1983) (presence of pipes customarily used for the purpose of consuming cocaine considered to support instruction on lesser included offense).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Luis Salgado (99-5645) Wilfredo Jambu (99-5651)
(2×)
See also United States v. Roper, 135 F.3d 430, 434 (6th Cir.)("The salient issue is the role the defendant played in relation to the activity for which the court held him or her accountable."), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 920 (1998); United States v. Welch, 97 F.3d 142, 152 (6th Cir. 1996)(reduction inappropriate where full amount of drugs in conspiracy was not attributed to defendant); United States v. Walton, 908 F.2d 1289, 1303 (6th Cir.)(noting that while defendants were minor participants in relation to the scope of the conspiracy as a whole, they were not entitled to a role reduction since th…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dora Garcia Cisneros
See, e.g., United States v. Thompson, 130 F.3d 676 , (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 920 , 118 S.Ct. 2307 , 141 L.Ed.2d 166 (1998)(using beyond reasonable doubt standard).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Springer
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 97-8912.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 8, 1998.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.