green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Maine Taxpayers Action Network v. Secretary of State
(2×)
But see Hart v. Sec’y of State, 1998 ME 189, ¶ 13 , 715 A.2d 165, 168 , cert. denied 525 U.S. 1139 , 119 S.Ct. 1028 , 143 L.Ed.2d 38 (1999) (concluding that Maine’s residency requirement did not violate the constitutional right to free speech).
discussed
Cited "but see"
State Ex Rel. Tayr Kilaab Al Ghashiyah v. Sullivan
But cf. Wilson v. Yaklich, 148 F.3d 596, 605 (6th Cir. 1998) (concluding that inmate's right to access the courts .was not violated because he had not shown that he would be barred from seeking relief in state court), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1139 (1999). 7 We do not decide what result would be proper for an as-applied challenge by an inmate seeking to litigate a fundamental right not specifically excluded from the definition of a prisoner.
discussed
Cited "see"
David A. Jones v. Secretary of State
See 525 U.S. 1139 (1999). 22 21-A M.R.S. §§ 101, 121 (2020), is a simple13 and, more importantly, verifiable way for the Secretary of State to determine a person’s residency in Maine at the time of circulation of a petition—a consideration that was not discussed in Buckley, 525 U.S. at 195-97 .
cited
Cited "see"
Osarczuk v. Associated Universities, Inc.
II, supra at 859; see Roberts v Florida Power & Light Co., 146 F3d 1305 , 1308 [1998], cert denied 525 US 1139 [1999]).
cited
Cited "see"
McReynolds v. Alabama Department of Youth Services
See Roberts v. Florida Power & Light Co., 146 F.3d 1305, 1307 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1139 , 119 S.Ct. 1027 , 143 L.Ed.2d 38 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Roger L. Harris, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
When considering a Rule 50 motion after the jury has returned its verdict, the district court may set aside the verdict only where there is “such a complete absence of evidence supporting the verdict that the jury’s findings could only have been the result of sheer surmise and conjecture, or ... such an overwhelming amount of evidence in favor of the movant that reasonable and fair minded men could not arrive at a verdict against him.” Song, 957 F.2d at 1046 (quoting Mattivi v. South African Marine Corp., 618 F.2d 163, 168 (2d Cir.1980)) (internal quotation marks omitted); see Taylor v. …
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, LLP
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Seus v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc., 146 F.3d 175 (3d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1139 , 119 S.Ct. 1028 , 143 L.Ed.2d 38 (1999); Koveleskie v. SBC Capital Markets, Inc., 167 F.3d 361 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 811 , 120 S.Ct. 44 , 145 L.Ed.2d 40 (1999); Desiderio v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc., 191 F.3d 198 (2d Cir.1999), pet. for cert. filed, 68 USLW 3497 (Jan. 31, 2000); Rosenberg v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 170 F.3d 1 (1st Cir.1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
DiRienzo v. Philip Services Corp.
See Europe & Overseas Commodity Traders, S.A. v. Banque Paribas London, 147 F.3d 118, 127-29 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1139 , 119 S.Ct. 1029 , 143 L.Ed.2d 39 (1999); Bersch v. Drexel Firestone, Inc., 519 F.2d 974, 993 (2d Cir.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Paul Revere Variable Annuity Insurance v. Kirschhofer
See Seus v. John Nuveen & Co., 146 F.3d 175, 187 (3d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1139 , 119 S.Ct. 1028 , 143 L.Ed.2d 38 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Wolff v. Moore
See Wil son v. Yaklich, 148 F.3d 596, 604 (6th Cir.1998), ce rt. denied, 525 U.S. 1139 , 119 S.Ct. 1028 , 143 L.Ed.2d 38 (1999); Hampton v. Hobbs, 106 F.3d 1281, 1286 (6th Cir.1997). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
C. Leon Smith v. The Equitable
See Smith v. The Equitable, 27 F.Supp.2d 565, 568 (E.D.Pa. 1998) (citing Sens v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc., 146 F.3d 175, 178 (8d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1139 , 119 S.Ct. 1028 , 143 L.Ed.2d 38 , and Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp., 500 U.S. 20, 26 , 111 S.Ct. 1647, 1652 , 114 L.Ed.2d 26 (1991)).
cited
Cited "see"
McLindon v. Russell
See Wilson v. Yaklich, 148 F.3d 596, 604 (6th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1139 , 119 S.Ct. 1028 , 143 L.Ed.2d 38 (1999); Hampton v. Hobbs, 106 F.3d 1281, 1287 (6th Cir.1997).
cited
Cited "see"
McLindon v. Russell
See Wilson v. Yaklich, 148 F.3d 596, 604 (6th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1139 , 119 S.Ct. 1028 , 143 L.Ed.2d 38 (1999); Hampton v. Hobbs, 106 F.3d 1281, 1287 (6th Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robertson v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.
Graham, 230 F.3d at 38-39 ; see also Taylor v. Brentwood Union Free School Dist., 143 F.3d 679 , 684 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1139 , 119 S.Ct. 1027 , 143 L.Ed.2d 37 (1999); Hargett v. National Westminster Bank, USA 78 F.3d 836, 839-40 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 824 , 117 S.Ct. 84 , 136 L.Ed.2d 41 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kulling v. Grinders for Industry, Inc.
The OWBPA, under the express language of the statute itself, encompasses only “right[s] or claimfs] under” the ADEA. 29 U.S.C. § 626 (f)(1); see also Seus v. John Nuveen & Co., 146 F.3d 175, 181 (3d Cir.1998) (holding that the protection afforded by the OWBPA “is limited to the waiver of substantive rights under the ADEA”), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1139 , 119 S.Ct. 1028 , 143 L.Ed.2d 38 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Taylor
v.
Rooney and Rooney v. Taylor
v.
Rooney and Rooney v. Taylor
No. 98-606; No. 98-789.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1999.
525 U.S. 1139
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 143 F. 3d 679.