green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2006 ·
…f the erroneous evidentiary ruling violates a right of the defendant guaranteed by the constitution of the united states, the state has the burden of showing that the error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Peterson
(2×)
f the erroneous evidentiary ruling violates a right of the defendant guaranteed by the constitution of the united states, the state has the burden of showing that the error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Carter
App. 216, 219 , 519 S.E.2d 770, 772 (1999); see State v. Mickey, 347 N.C. 508, 516 , 495 S.E.2d 669, 674 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 853 , 142 L.
examined
Cited "see"
Byndloss v. State
(4×)
See United States v. Soto-Cervantes, 138 F.3d 1319, 1322 (10th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 853 , 525 U.S. 853 , 119 S.Ct. 131 , 142 L.Ed.2d 106 (1998); Karnes v. Skrutski, 62 F.3d 485, 491 (3rd Cir.1995); United States v. Ramos, 42 F.3d 1160, 1163 (8th Cir.1994); United States v. Obasa, 15 F.3d 603, 607 (6th Cir.1994); People v. Rodriguez, 945 P.2d 1351, 1360 (Colo.1997) ( en banc ); Commonwealth v. Torres, 424 Mass. 153 , 674 N.E.2d 638, 642 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Seldon v. State
See United States v. Soto-Cervantes, *231 138 F.3d 1319, 1322 (10th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 853 , 119 S.Ct. 131 , 142 L.Ed.2d 106 (1998); Karnes v. Skrutski, 62 F.3d 485, 491 (3rd Cir.1995); United States v. Ramos, 42 F.3d 1160, 1163 (8th Cir.1994); United States v. Obasa, 15 F.3d 603, 607 (6th Cir.1994); People v. Rodriguez, 945 P.2d 1351, 1360 (Colo.1997) (en banc); Commonwealth v. Torres, 424 Mass. 153 , 674 N.E.2d 638, 642 (Mass.1997).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bartlett
See State v. Mickey, 347 N.C. 508, 518 , 495 S.E.2d 669, 676 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 853 , 142 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Whittenburg
See also State v. Mickey, 347 N.C. 508 , 519, 495 S.E.2d 669 , 676 (1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 853 , 142 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. McCree
See also State v. Mickey, 347 N.C. 508, 519 , 495 S.E.2d 669, 676 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 853 , 142 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pitawanakwat
See e.g., Clarey v. Gregg, 138 F.3d 764 (9th Cir), cert denied, 525 U.S. 853 , 119 S.Ct. 131 , 142 L.Ed.2d 106 (1998); Then v. Melendez, 92 F.3d 851, 855 (9th Cir1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gell
However, “[i]n order to ..be corroborative and therefore properly admissible, the prior statement of the witness need not merely relate to specific facts brought out in the witness’s testimony at trial, so long as the prior statement in fact tends to add weight or credibility to such testimony.” State v. Ramey, 318 N.C. 457, 469 , 349 S.E.2d 566, 573 (1986); see also State v. Mickey, 347 N.C. 508, 519 , 495 S.E.2d 669, 676 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 853 , 142 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams
v.
Cain, Warden
v.
Cain, Warden
No. 97-9464.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1998.
525 U.S. 853
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.