Princess Cruises, Inc. v. Gen. Elec. Co., 525 U.S. 982 (1998). · Go Syfert
Princess Cruises, Inc. v. Gen. Elec. Co., 525 U.S. 982 (1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the fourteenth amendment allows debtors to enforce the provisions of the bankruptcy code in federal court notwithstanding the states' eleventh amendment immunity.”
41 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re: Gary Lazar (ca9, 2001-01-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In Re: Gary Lazar
9th Cir. · 2001 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the fourteenth amendment allows debtors to enforce the provisions of the bankruptcy code in federal court notwithstanding the states' eleventh amendment immunity.
cited Cited "see" Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton, & Scripps
9th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Duffield v. Robertson, Stephens & Co., 525 U.S. 982 , 119 S.Ct. 445 , 142 L.Ed.2d 399 (1998).
cited Cited "see" Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton, & Scripps, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton, & Scripps
9th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Duffield v. Robertson, Stephens & Co., 525 U.S. 982 , 119 S.Ct. 445 , 142 L.Ed.2d 399 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" Samedi v. Miami-Dade County
S.D. Fla. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mencer v. Hammonds, 134 F.3d 1066 , 1070 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 982 , 119 S.Ct. 445 , 142 L.Ed.2d 399 (1998) (noting the intent requirement established for equal protection violations in Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229, 239-44 , 96 S.Ct. 2040 , 48 L.Ed.2d 597 (1976)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re David's Supermarkets, Inc.
Tex. App. · 2001 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Duffield v. Robertson Stephens & Co., 144 F.3d 1182 , 1187 n. 3 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 982 , 119 S.Ct. 445 , 142 L.Ed.2d 399 (1998); Swenson, 858 F.2d at 1309 ; DeSapio, 143 Misc.2d at 616 , 540 N.Y.S.2d at 936 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Miller v. Hygrade Food Products Corp.
E.D. Pa. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
In fact, one of the clear purposes of the 1991 Act was “to provide appropriate remedies for intentional discrimination and unlawful harassment in the workplace.” 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Historical and Statutory Notes section entitled Purposes of 1991 Amendments (emphasis added); see also, Duffield v. Robertson Stephens & Co., 144 F.3d 1182, 1193 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 982 , 119 S.Ct. 445 , 142 L.Ed.2d 399 (1998) (characterizing this purpose as the “primary purpose”). 9 This point deserves attention because denying class certification does not mean that plaintiffs will ultimately …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Princess Cruises, Inc.
v.
General Electric Co.
No. 98-254.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 9, 1998.
525 U.S. 982

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.