discussed Cited "see" United States v. Harwell This conclusion is animated by the general rule that “[ojnce law en *1202 forcement officers lawfully enter a house, they need not comply with the knock and announce statute [ 18 U.S.C. § 3109 ] before entering every other closed door within residence.” United States v. Johnson, 573 F.Supp. 998, 1000 (D.Kan.1983) (citing United States v. Crawford, 657 F.2d 1041 (9th Cir.1981)), aff'd, 767 F.2d 730 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1009 , 106 S.Ct. 535 , 88 L.Ed.2d 465 (1985); see United States v. Oates, 173 F.3d 651, 657 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 890 , 120 S.Ct. 213 , 145 L.Ed.…

cited Cited "see" UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. LUCIANO MARTINEZ-FIGUEROA, — See United States v. Oates, 173 F.3d 651, 658-59 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 890 , 120 S.Ct. 213 , 145 L.Ed.2d 179 (1999).

cited Cited "see" United States v. Edward Lee Williams See United States v. Oates, 173 F.3d 651, 660 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 890 , 120 S.Ct. 213 , 145 L.Ed.2d 179 (1999).

cited Cited "see" United States v. Edward Lee Williams See United States v. Oates, 173 F.3d 651, 660 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 890 (1999).