green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. Knight
(2×)
See In re Thomas, 740 A.2d 538 (D.C.1999), ce rt. denied, 529 U.S. 1021 , 120 S.Ct. 1425 , 146 L.Ed.2d 316 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Hager
See In re Thomas, 740 A.2d 538, 546-47 (D.C.1999), cert. de *924 nied, 529 U.S. 1021 , 120 S.Ct. 1425 , 146 L.Ed.2d 316 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Baker ex rel. Mandatory Punitive Damages Class v. Hazelwood
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Beachy v. Boise Cascade Corp., 191 F.3d 1010, 1013 (9th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 529 U.S. 1021 , 120 S.Ct. 1425 , 146 L.Ed.2d 316 (2000) (noting that we review a district court's formulation of civil jury instructions for an abuse of discretion). . 977 F.2d 1347, 1348 (9th Cir.1992) (en banc) (“Unless an alternative method is provided by rule of this court, ‘[a] panel faced with such a[n] [intra-circuit] conflict must call for en banc review, which the court will normally grant.’ ”) (internal citations omitted). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Lee
See also Howe v. Richardson (In re Howe), 193 F.3d 60 (1st Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1021 , 120 S.Ct. 1424 , 146 L.Ed.2d 315 (2000); Matter of Yonikus, 974 F.2d 901, 904 (7th Cir. 1992); In re MacDonald, 326 B.R. 6, 10 (Bankr.D.Mass.2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Caterpillar Inc.
v.
New Hampshire Department of Revenue
v.
New Hampshire Department of Revenue
No. 99-1214.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 20, 2000.
Published
Sup. Ct. N. H. Certiorari denied.