green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.3 score
“he clause is designed to protect against legislative abuses and to provide fair notice of the consequences of criminal actions”
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
John Doe v. Rausch
he clause is designed to protect against legislative abuses and to provide fair notice of the consequences of criminal actions
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Chamberlain
See Cutshall v. Sundquist, 193 F.3d 466, 479 (6th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1554 , 146 L.Ed.2d 460 (2000); Doe v. Pataki, 3 F.Supp.2d 456, 467 (S.D.N.Y.1998); Russell v. Gregoire, 124 F.3d 1079, 1094 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
Hans v. Ohio State Univ. Med. Ctr., 07ap-10 (6-28-2007)
See Harris v. Liston (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 203 , 205-206 , certiorari denied (2000), 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1555 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n v. Rowe
(2×)
See Good v. United States, 189 F.3d 1355, 1363 (Fed.Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1554 , 146 L.Ed.2d 459 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mole v. University of Massachusetts
See Stimpson v. Tuscaloosa, 186 F.3d 1328 , 1331-1332 (11th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 (2000); Willis v. Marion County Auditor’s Office, 118 F.3d 542, 547-548 (7th Cir. 1997); Long v. Eastfield College, 88 F.3d 300, 307 (5th Cir. 1996).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Corizzi
See In re Sofaer, 728 A.2d 625, 628 (D.C.), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1555 , 146 L.Ed.2d 460 (2000) (providing legal advice is clearly a feature of an attorney-client relationship).
cited
Cited "see"
Hyatt v. Commonwealth
See Cutshall v. Sundquist, 193 F.3d 466 (6th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1554 , 146 L.Ed.2d 460 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Helman v. State
See Cutshall v. Sundquist, 6th Cir., 193 F.3d 466, 479 (1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1554 , 146 L.Ed.2d 460 (2000); Russell v. Gregoire, 9th Cir., 124 F.3d 1079, 1094 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1007 , 118 S.Ct. 1191 , 140 L.Ed.2d 321 (1998); E.B. v. Verniero, 3d Cir., 119 F.3d 1077, 1102-04 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1110 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walcek v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Good v. United States, 39 Fed.Cl. 81, 112 (1997) (refusing to include in the plaintiff’s reasonable investment-backed expectations amounts expended after the regulated nature of the property was known), aff'd, 189 F.3d 1355 (Fed.Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1554 , 146 L.Ed.2d 459 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ceeda Enterprises, Inc. v. Fulton County, Georgia
See Sammy’s of Mobile, Ltd, v. City of Mobile, 140 F.3d 993, 996 (11th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, -- U.S. –, 120 S.Ct. 1553 (2000).9 We have subsequently reaffirmed this holding, guided by Pap’s, reasoning that regulations targeting undesirable secondary effects of adult entertainment establishments that serve alcoholic beverages are unrelated to the suppression of the erotic message conveyed by nude dancing.
discussed
Cited "see"
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. Of Georgia, D.B.A. Mardi Gras v. Fulton County, Georgia the Board of Commissioners of Fulton County, Georgia., 6420 Roswell Road, Inc. , a Georgia Corporation, D.B.A. Flashers, Harry Freese, Individually and as Licensee for Flashers v. Fulton County, the Board of Commissioners of Fulton County, Georgia, Ceeda Enterprises, Inc. D.B.A. Riley's Restaurant and Lounge v. Fulton County, Georgia, the Board of Commissioners of Fulton County, Georgia
See Sammy's of Mobile, Ltd, v. City of Mobile, 140 F.3d 993, 996 (11th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, -- U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 1553 (2000). 9 We have subsequently reaffirmed this holding, guided by Pap's, reasoning that regulations targeting undesirable secondary effects of adult entertainment establishments that serve alcoholic beverages are unrelated to the suppression of the erotic message conveyed by nude dancing.
discussed
Cited "see"
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. of Georgia v. Fulton County
See Sammy’s of Mobile, Ltd., v. City of Mobile, 140 F.3d 993, 996 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1052 , 120 S.Ct. 1553 , 146 L.Ed.2d 459 (2000). 9 We have subsequently reaffirmed this holding, guided by *984 Pap’s , reasoning that regulations targeting undesirable secondary effects of adult entertainment establishments that serve alcoholic beverages are unrelated to the suppression of the erotic message conveyed by nude dancing.
cited
Cited "see"
STATE, DEPT. ENVITONMENTAL PROTECTION v. Burgess
See Good v. U.S., 189 F.3d 1355, 1360-61 (Fed.Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1554 , 146 L.Ed.2d 459 (2000); Loveladies Harbor, Inc. v. U.S., 28 F.3d 1171, 1182 (Fed.Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jefferies v. Lee
U.S. 433, 441 (1997); see also Cutshall v. Sundquist, 193 F.3d 466, 476 (6th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 (2000) (“The clause is designed to protect against legislative abuses and to provide fair notice of the consequences of criminal actions”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re NICK H.
Id. at 1281-83; see also Cutshall v. Sundquist, 193 F.3d 466, 474, 477 (6th Cir.1999) (finding no ex post facto violation where law enforcement officials have the discretion to disclose registry information only when necessary to protect the public), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1554 , 146 L.Ed.2d 460 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bradshaw v. Steadfast Financial, L.L.C.
If Dearing owned no interest in the land, and only owned the executive rights on the property, this duty would still be imposed.” Id.; see also Mafrige v. United States, 893 F.Supp. 691, 703 (S.D.Tex.1995) (citing Dearing, Mims, and Comanche for the proposition that the lower Texas courts since Manges have found a fiduciary obligation whenever the amounts due on the NPRI are linked to the royalty negotiated by the holder of the executive interest instead of a fixed fractional amount in the deed), aff'd, 189 F.3d 466 (5th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1554 , 146 L.Ed.2d 4…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brace v. United States
See also Good v. United States, 189 F.3d 1355, 1360 (Fed.Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1554 , 146 L.Ed.2d 459 (2000); Creppel v. United States, 41 F.3d 627, 631 (Fed.Cir.1994); Loveladies Harbor, 28 F.3d at 1179; Florida Rock Indus., Inc. v. United States, 18 F.3d 1560, 1567 (Fed.Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1109 , 115 S.Ct. 898 , 130 L.Ed.2d 783 (1995); Arctic King Fisheries, Inc. v. United States, 59 Fed.Cl. 360, 368-69 (2004). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brunner, Unpublished Decision (3-28-2005)
See, also, Cutshall v. Sundquist (C.A. 6, 1999), 193 F.3d 466 , cert denied (2000), 529 U.S. 1053 ; State v. Vincent (Feb. 3, 2000), Stark App. No. CA99-03.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arctic King Fisheries, Inc. v. United States
See also Good v. United States, 189 F.3d 1355, 1360 (Fed.Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1554 , 146 L.Ed.2d 459 (2000); Loveladies Harbor, Inc. v. United States, 28 F.3d 1171, 1179 (Fed.Cir.1994); Florida Rock Indus., Inc. v. United States, 18 F.3d 1560, 1567 (Fed.Cir.1994); Creppel v. United States, 41 F.3d 627, 631 (Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wu v. Southeast-Atlantic Beverage Corp.
“To establish pretext, Plaintiff must show not only that [retaliatory] animus existed but that such animus tainted the ultimate decisionmaker’s action.” Cooper v. Southern Co., 260 F.Supp.2d 1258, 1274-75 (N.D.Ga.2003)(citing Llampallas v. Mini-Circuits, Lab, Inc., 163 F.3d 1236, 1248 (11th Cir.1998)); see also Stimpson v. City of Tuscaloosa, 186 F.3d 1328, 1331 (11th Cir.1999) (“When the biased recommender and the actual decisionmaker are not the same person or persons, a plaintiff may not benefit from the inference of causation that would arise from their common identity.”), cert. …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Betz, Unpublished Decision (12-15-2003)
See, also, Cutshall v. Sundquist (C.A. 6, 1999), 193 F.3d 466 , cert denied (2000), 529 U.S. 1053 ; State v. Vincent (Feb. 3, 2000), Stark App. No. CA99-03.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
A. A. v. State of NJ
See also Cutshall v. Sundquist, 193 F.3d 466, 481 (6th Cir. 1999) (holding that Constitution does not provide registrant right to keep his registry information private), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 (2000); Russell v. Gregoire, 124 F.3d 1079, 1094 (9th Cir. 1997) (finding no privacy interest in the general vicinity of registrant’s home address), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
No. 01-4363
See also Cutshall v. Sundquist, 193 F.3d 466, 481 (6th Cir.1999) (holding that Constitution does not provide registrant right to keep his registry information private), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1554 , 146 L.Ed.2d 460 (2000); Russell v. Gregoire, 124 F.3d 1079, 1094 (9th Cir.1997) (finding no privacy interest in the general vicinity of registrant's home address), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
A. A. v. New Jersey
See also Cutshall v. Sundquist, 193 F.3d 466, 481 (6th Cir.1999) (holding that Constitution does not provide registrant right to keep his registry information private), ce rt. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1554 , 146 L.Ed.2d 460 (2000); Russell v. Gregoire, 124 F.3d 1079, 1094 (9th Cir.1997) (finding no privacy interest in the general vicinity of registrant’s home address), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paalan v. United States
Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co., 467 U.S. 986, 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 2862 , 81 L.Ed.2d 815 (1984); see also Good v. United States, 189 F.3d 1355, 1360 (Fed.Cir.1999), ce rt. denied 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1554 , 146 L.Ed.2d 459 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bani
See, e.g., Cutshall v. Sundquist, 193 F.3d 466 (6th Cir.), reh’g and suggestion for reh’g en banc denied, (1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1554 , 146 L.Ed.2d 460 (2000); Russell v. Gregoire, 124 F.3d 1079 (9th Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, 523 U.S. 1007 , 118 S.Ct. 1191 , 140 L.Ed.2d 321 (1998); Artway v. Attorney General, 81 F.3d 1235 (3d Cir.1996) [hereinafter Artway II]; Patterson v. State, 985 P.2d 1007 (Alaska App.1999); Snyder v. State, 912 P.2d 1127 (Wyo.1996); Kellar v. Fayetteville Police Department, 339 Ark. 274 , 5 S.W.3d 402 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brownell v. City of Rochester
(2×)
See, e.g., Colacurcio v. City of Kent, 163 F.3d 545, 553-55 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1053 , 120 S.Ct. 1553 , 146 L.Ed.2d 459 (2000); BSA, Inc. v. King County, 804 F.2d 1104, 1111 (9th Cir.1986). *487 The licensing aspects of the Ordinance are subject to a somewhat different analysis.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Knights of Columbus v. Town of Lexington
(2×)
See also Church of The Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520, 558 , 113 S.Ct. 2217, 2239 , 124 L.Ed.2d 472 (1993) (Scalia, J., concurring) (subjective motivation of lawmakers irrelevant when conducting analysis under First Amendment, and “it is virtually impossible to determine the singular ‘motive’ of a collective legislative body .... ”). 1 As a result, courts rely on “objective indicators of intent,” including the “face of the statute, the effect of the statute, comparison to prior law, facts surrounding enactment, the stated purpose, and the record of proce…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Colacurcio
v.
City of Kent
v.
City of Kent
No. 98-2053.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 3, 2000.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Tennessee (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.