green
Positive treatment
12.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. Glaxosmithkline, PLC
(3×)
See Free, 176 F.3d at 299-301 (noting that the Louisiana Supreme Court had denied certification on the question of indirect purchaser antitrust standing submitted to it by a Fifth Circuit panel and holding that *437 “[i]n our best judgment, the Louisiana courts would follow the federal indirect purchaser rule and deny standing to the [indirect purchaser] appellants.”) aff'd 529 U.S. 333 , 120 S.Ct. 1578 , 146 L.Ed.2d 306 (2000).
examined
Cited "see"
Julie Olden, Richard Hunter, Wilbur Bleau, and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lafarge Corp.
(3×)
See Free v. Abbott Labs., 529 U.S. 333 , 120 S.Ct. 1578 , 146 L.Ed.2d 306 (2000) (per curiam).
examined
Cited "see"
del Rosario Ortega v. Star Kist
(6×)
See Free v. Abbott Labs., Inc., 529 U.S. 333 , 120 S.Ct. 1578 , 146 L.Ed.2d 306 (2000). 5 30 The problem has actually arisen in two contexts, each of which is the subject of a circuit split.
examined
Cited "see"
Flowers v. EZPawn Oklahoma, Inc.
(3×)
See Free v. Abbott Labs., 529 U.S. 333 , 120 S.Ct. 1578 , 146 L.Ed.2d 306 (2000) (per curiam) (4-4 vote).
examined
Cited "see"
Jackson v. City of San Antonio
(3×)
See Crocker v. Borden, Inc., 852 F.Supp. 1322, 1329-31 (E.D.La.1994) (declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (c)(4) due to complexity of asbestos-related litigation). . 51 F.3d 524 , 525 (5th Cir.1995). . 529 U.S. 333 , 120 S.Ct. 1578 , 146 L.Ed.2d 306 (2000). .
examined
Cited "see"
Hudgins Moving & Storage Co. v. American Express Co.
(3×)
See 529 U.S. 333 , 120 S.Ct. 1578 , 146 L.Ed.2d 306 (2000).
examined
Cited "see"
O'Keefe v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
(3×)
See Free v. Abbott Labs., Inc., 529 U.S. 333 , 120 S.Ct. 1578 , 146 L.Ed.2d 306 (2000) (per curiam).
examined
Cited "see"
Fox v. Cheminova, Inc.
(3×)
See In re Abbott Labs., 51 F.3d 524, 529 (5th Cir.1995), aff'd by equally divided court, 529 U.S. 333 , 120 S.Ct. 1578 , 146 L.Ed.2d 306 (2000); Rosmer v. Pfizer, Inc., 263 F.3d 110, 114-119 (4th Cir.2001), rehearing en banc denied, 272 F.3d 243 (4th Cir.2001), cert. dismissed, — U.S.-, 123 S.Ct. 14 , 153 L.Ed.2d 878 (2002); In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig., 123 F.3d 599, 607 (7th Cir.1997); Gibson v. Chrysler- Corp., 261 F.3d 927 , 933-940 (9th Cir.2001).
examined
Cited "see"
Payne v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
(3×)
See In re Abbott Laboratories, Inc., 51 F.3d 524 (5th Cir.1995), aff'd by an equally divided court, 529 U.S. 333 , 120 S.Ct. 1578 , 146 L.Ed.2d 306 (2000) (per curiam); Stromberg Metal Works, Inc. v. Press Mechanical, Inc., 77 F.3d 928 (7th Cir.1996); 3 Gibson v. Chrysler Corp., 261 F.3d 927 (9th Cir.2001); Rosmer v. Pfizer, Inc., 263 F.3d 110 (4th Cir.2001).
examined
Cited "see"
Bunker's Glass Co. v. Pilkington PlC
(3×)
See Free v. Abbott Labs., Inc., 176 F.3d 298, 301 (5th Cir.1999), aff'd, 529 U.S. 333 , 120 S.Ct. 1578 , 146 L.Ed.2d 306 (2000) (predicting Louisiana would follow Illinois Brick); Oregon Laborers-Employers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc., 185 F.3d 957, 963 (9th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1075 , 120 S.Ct. 789 , 145 L.Ed.2d 666 (2000) (holding that indirect purchasers could not sue under Oregon antitrust law where parties treated state and federal antitrust claims as one and the same for purposes of standing analysis); Duvall v. Silvers, Asher, Sher & McLaren, 998 S.W.2…
examined
Cited "see"
Chapman Funeral Home, Inc. v. National Linen Service
(3×)
See Free v. Abbott Labs., 529 U.S. 333 , 120 S.Ct. 1578 , 146 L.Ed.2d 306 (2000).
examined
Cited "see"
Kurt Crawford v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche
(3×)
See H & D Tire & Automotive-Hardware v. Pitney Bowes Inc., 227 F.3d 326, 330-31 (citing In re Abbott Laboratories, 51 F.3d 524 (5th Cir.1995), aff 'd by an equally divided Court, 529 U.S. 333 , 120 S.Ct. 1578 , 146 L.Ed.2d 306 (2000)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Crawford v. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd.
See H & D Tire & Automotive-Hardware v. Pitney Bowes Inc., 227 F.3d 326, 330-31 (citing In re Abbott Laboratories, 51 F.3d 524 (5th Cir. 1995), aff'd by an equally divided Court, 529 U.S. 333 (2000)).
examined
Cited "see"
Louise Rosmer, on Behalf of Herself and as Class Representative v. Pfizer Incorporated
(4×)
See Free v. Abbott Labs., 529 U.S. 333 (2000) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
Rosmer v. Pfizer Incorporated
See Free v. Abbott Labs., 529 U.S. 333 (2000) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ursula Gibson Mary Depina, Individually on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Chrysler Corporation, Paul Maldonado v. Chrysler Corporation, Stephen Depalma, Ursula Gibson Mary Depina, Individually on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Chrysler Corporation, Stephen Depalma v. Chrysler Corporation v. Paul Malonando, Chrysler Corporation
(2×)
See 529 U.S. 333 (2000).
examined
Cited "see"
Gibson v. Chrysler Corp.
(4×)
See 529 U.S. 333 , 120 S.Ct. 1578 , 146 L.Ed.2d 306 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Rex T. Morrison v. Allstate Indemnity Co.
See id. 19 An affirmance by an equally divided Supreme Court has no precedential value.
examined
Cited "see"
Krieger v. Gast
(3×)
See Free v. Abbott Labs., Inc., 529 U.S. 333 , 120 S.Ct. 1578 , 146 L.Ed.2d 306 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Terry Mehlenbacher v. Akzo Nobel Salt, Inc.
See Free, 120 S. Ct. 1578 . 10 20 It would, however, be premature for us to address this vexing question of statutory interpretation.
cited
Cited "see"
Mehlenbacher v. Akzo Nobel Salt, Inc.
See Free, 120 S.Ct. 1578 . 10 It would, however, be premature for us to address this vexing question of statutory interpretation.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lyon v. Caterpillar, Inc.
(2×)
See Free v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc., - U.S. - , 120 S.Ct. 1578 , 146 L.Ed.2d 306 (2000).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Delvin C. Payton v. County of Kane
(3×)
See also Free v. Abbott Labs., 529 U.S. 333 , 120 S.Ct. 1578 , 146 L.Ed.2d 306 (2000) (Court divides 4-A on this issue).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Payton, Delvin C. v. County of Kane
See also Free v. Abbott Labs., 529 U.S. 333 (2000) (Court divides 4-4 on this issue).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chiartas v. Bavarian Motor Works, AG
(2×)
Compare In re Abbott Laboratories v. Abbott Labs., 51 F.3d 524, 527-29 (5th Cir.1995) (finding § 1367 legislatively overruled Zahn , thereby permitting district courts to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over class members whose claims do not meet the jurisdictional amount), aff'd by equally divided court, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 1578 , 146 L.Ed.2d 306 (2000), with Leonhardt v. Western Sugar Co., 160 F.3d 631, 640-41 (10th Cir.1998) (holding § 1367 did not overrule Zahn in class actions).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FREE et al.
v.
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., et al.
v.
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., et al.
99-391.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 3, 2000.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 53 opinions | Published
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Daniel A. Small argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Michael D. Hausfeld, Matthew F. Pawa, Eric L. Olson, Daniel E. Gustafson, Howard J. Sedran, and Don Barrett.
Frank Cicero, Jr., argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Craig A. Knot, Christopher Landau, and Max R. Shulman.[*]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
[*] Jane Bishop Johnson filed a brief for the State of Louisiana as amicus curiae urging reversal.
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States et al. by Evan M. Tager, Robin S. Conrad, and Donald D. Evans; for the Product Liability Advisory Council by John H. Beisner; and for the Securities Industry Association by Stuart J. Kaswell.