green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.7 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[P]ersuasive summation of the facts admitted into evidence is the very purpose of clos- ing argument.”
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Camirand
ersuasive summation of the facts admitted into evidence is the very purpose of clos- ing argument.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cotner v. United States
See Cotner v. Boorze, 530 U.S. 1271 (2000). lln this case, resolved earlier this year by another judge of this court, several post- judgment meritless submissions were received from the plaintiffs, prompting the court to order that the Clerl< Was “directed to accept no further filings iri this case by Kenneth Duvali, Robert Cotner, or Dennis Martin, Without an [o]rder granting leave to [submit] such filings from the Chief Judge of the Court of Federal Claims.” Duvall v. United Stotes, No. 18-313, Order of June 28, 2018, ECF No. 17 (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited "see"
LeRoy Carhart v. John Ashcroft
(2×)
See Hope Clinic v. Ryan, 195 F.3d 857, 883-84 (7th Cir.1999) (en banc) (Posner, J., dissenting), vacated and remanded, 530 U.S. 1271 , 120 S.Ct. 2738 , 147 L.Ed.2d 1001 (2000); see also Lockhart v. McCree, 476 U.S. 162 , 169 n. 3, 106 S.Ct. 1758 , 90 L.Ed.2d 137 (1986) (expressing doubt that “legislative facts” are reviewed deferentially because different courts can come to different conclusions from the same evidence).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carhart v. Gonzales
(2×)
See Hope Clinic v. Ryan, 195 F.3d 857, 883-84 (7th Cir.1999) (en banc) (Posner, J., dissenting), vacated and remanded, 530 U.S. 1271 , 120 S.Ct. 2738 , 147 L.Ed.2d 1001 (2000); see also Lockhart v. McCree, 476 U.S. 162 , 169 n. 3, 106 S.Ct. 1758 , 90 L.Ed.2d 137 (1986) (expressing doubt that "legislative facts" are reviewed deferentially because different courts can come to different conclusions from the same evidence).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Keeling
See Jones v. United States, 530 U.S. 1271 , 120 S.Ct. 2739 , 147 L.Ed.2d 1002 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Opinion No.
See Freiler v. Tangipahoa Parish Bd. , 185 F.3d 337 , 343 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied , 530 U.S. 1271 (2000); see also Briggs v. Mississippi , 331 F.3d 499 , 505 (5th Cir. 2003), cert. denied , 124 S.Ct. 1070 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Cotner v. Boone
See Cotner v. Boone, 530 U.S. 1271 , 120 S.Ct. 2762 , 147 L.Ed.2d 1002 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Hope Clinic v. Ryan, James E.
See 530 U.S. 1271 , 1271, 120 S.Ct. 2738 , 2739, 147 L.Ed.2d 1001 , 1002 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
A WOMAN'S CHOICE-EAST SIDE WOMEN'S CLIN. v. Newman
(2×)
See Hope Clinic v. Ryan, 195 F.3d 857, 865 (7th Cir.1999) ( en banc ) ("Courts of appeals are divided on the question whether Salerno applies to abortion legislation."), vacated, 530 U.S. 1271 , 120 S.Ct. 2739 , 147 L.Ed.2d 1002 (2000); Carhart v. Stenberg, 192 F.3d 1142 , 1149 (8th Cir.1999) ("In considering a challenge to the facial validity of an abortion regulation, we follow the standard set out in Casey. "), aff'd, 530 U.S. 914 , 120 S.Ct. 2597 , 147 L.Ed.2d 743 . [8] In ruling on plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, this court concluded that " Casey effectively displaced Sal…
discussed
Cited "see"
A Woman's Choice-East Side Women's Clinic v. Newman
(2×)
See Hope Clinic v. Ryan, 195 F.3d 857, 865 (7th Cir.1999) (,en bane ) (“Courts of appeals are divided on the question whether Salerno applies to abortion legislation.”), vacated, 530 U.S. 1271 , 120 S.Ct. 2739 , 147 L.Ed.2d 1002 (2000); Carhart v. Stenberg, 192 F.3d 1142 , 1149 (8th Cir.1999) (“In considering a challenge to the facial validity of an abortion regulation, we follow the standard set out in Casey.”), aff'd, 530 U.S. 914 , 120 S.Ct. 2597 , 147 L.Ed.2d 743 . 8 In ruling on plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, this court concluded that “Casey effectively displ…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hope Clinic
v.
Ryan, Attorney General of Illinois
v.
Ryan, Attorney General of Illinois
No. 99-1152.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 26, 2000.
530 U.S. 1271
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Oregon (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Stenberg v. Carhart, ante, p. 914.